Sorry, correction, taking "the" time
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 22:18:30 +0300
uyilmaz wrote:
> Thanks for taking time to write a detailed answer.
>
> We use Solr to both store our data and to perform aggregations, using
> faceting or streaming expressions. When required analysis is too complex to
Thanks for taking time to write a detailed answer.
We use Solr to both store our data and to perform aggregations, using faceting
or streaming expressions. When required analysis is too complex to do in Solr,
we export large query results from Solr to a more capable analysis tool.
So I guess
Hmm. Fields used for faceting will also be used for filtering, which is a kind
of search. Are docValues OK for filtering? I expect they might be slow the
first time, then cached.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:15
uyilmaz:
Hmm, that _is_ confusing. And inaccurate.
In this context, it should read something like
The Text field should have indexed="true" docValues=“false" if used for
searching
but not faceting and the String field should have indexed="false"
docValues=“true"
if used for faceting but not
As you've observed, it is indeed possible to facet on fields with
docValues=true, indexed=false; but in almost all cases you should
probably set indexed=true. 1. for distributed facet count refinement,
the "indexed" approach is used to look up counts by value; 2. assuming
you're wanting to do
Thanks! This also contributed to my confusion:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/faceting.html#field-value-faceting-parameters
"If you want Solr to perform both analysis (for searching) and faceting on the
full literal strings, use the copyField directive in your Schema to create two
I think this is all explained quite well in the Ref Guide:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/docvalues.html
DocValues is a different way to index/store values. Faceting is a
primary use case where docValues are better than what 'indexed=true'
gives you.
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 19 Oct
Hey all,
>From my little experiments, I see that (if I didn't make a stupid mistake) we
>can facet on fields marked as both indexed and stored being false:
I'm suprised by this, I thought I would need to index it. Can you confirm this?
Regards
--
uyilmaz
