In article 20150303071552.gc27...@britannica.bec.de,
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
You are missing the most important part of my mail: why did this not go
to tech-userlevel first?
If we want to make every single change to go through tech-userlevel,
we should institute a rule
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want added?
In general:
Should we have more concrete commit rules, or do we prefer that current
status quo which is to leave things to people's judgement and occasionally
backout things when
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:58:56PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want added?
Bring it up on tech-userlevel.
In general:
Should we have more concrete commit rules, or do we prefer that current
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through tech-userlevel,
we should institute a rule to do so. To my knowledge we don't have yet
such a rule. We already have the rest of the p* programs which originated
in Solaris, we were missing this
Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel:
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through
tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my
knowledge we don't have yet such a rule. We already have the rest
of the p* programs
Am 03.03.15 um 21:32 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
I meant that adding to base was discuss-worthy because there's
a bloat or necessary question, not because of risk of
breakage.
Sure. So how much bloat is pwait? Is it a huge piece of
software or a small
Am 03.03.15 um 22:03 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
I think you contradict yourself, when you say a) new programs in
base are pretty rare, and b) we have too much commit first,
argue about appropriate later.
Both are true; some/most commit first discuss later
Am 03.03.15 um 21:22 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel:
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through
tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my
Am 03.03.15 um 16:58 schrieb Christos Zoulas:
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want added?
no.
In general:
Should we have more concrete commit rules, or do we prefer that current
status quo which is to leave things to
Am 03.03.15 um 17:49 schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:58:56PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want added?
Bring it up on tech-userlevel.
In general:
Should we have more
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel:
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through
tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my
knowledge we don't have yet such a rule. We already
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
I meant that adding to base was discuss-worthy because there's a
bloat or necessary question, not because of risk of breakage.
Sure. So how much bloat is pwait? Is it a huge piece of software
or a small utility? I think that matters a bit.
Posting a note
Christos Zoulas writes:
Module Name: xsrc
Committed By: christos
Date: Tue Mar 3 21:32:27 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
xsrc/external/mit/MesaLib/dist/src/mesa/main: imports.h
Log Message:
xmmintrin.h is a gcc-specific header
it is?
-rw-r--r-- 1 mrg wheel 27578 Feb 12
Taylor R Campbell writes:
Module Name: src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Tue Mar 3 13:57:20 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
src/sys/external/bsd/drm2/dist/drm/radeon: radeon_fence.c
Log Message:
radeon_fence_wait returns 0, not positive, on success.
i haven't confirmed yet,
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:19:01AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
Christos Zoulas writes:
Module Name:xsrc
Committed By: christos
Date: Tue Mar 3 21:32:27 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
xsrc/external/mit/MesaLib/dist/src/mesa/main: imports.h
Log
Date:Wed, 4 Mar 2015 00:13:01 +0100
From:Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de
Message-ID: 20150303231301.gb13...@britannica.bec.de
| It comes with a maintainance price. Add something better a version later
| and it is significantly harder to get rid of the
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:24:22 +1100
from: matthew green m...@eterna.com.au
Taylor R Campbell writes:
Module Name: src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Tue Mar 3 13:57:20 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
Taylor R Campbell writes:
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:24:22 +1100
from: matthew green m...@eterna.com.au
Taylor R Campbell writes:
Module Name: src
Committed By:riastradh
Date:Tue Mar 3 13:57:20 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:13:31PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 03.03.15 um 17:49 schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:58:56PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want
added?
Taylor R Campbell writes:
Module Name: src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Mon Mar 2 17:53:00 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
src/sys/external/bsd/drm2/dist/drm/radeon: radeon_fence.c
Log Message:
Return the error if there is one in radeon_fence_wait_seq.
Don't just always
On Mar 4, 9:19am, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: CVS commit: xsrc/external/mit/MesaLib/dist/src/mesa/main
|
| Christos Zoulas writes:
| Module Name:xsrc
| Committed By: christos
| Date: Tue Mar 3 21:32:27 UTC 2015
|
| Modified Files:
On Mar 3, 8:35am, g...@ir.bbn.com (Greg Troxel) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/pwait
| We do sort of have a rule, which is that significant changes need
| discussion. I would say adding programs to base always counts. Other
| than that, it's trickier, but if there's a
22 matches
Mail list logo
