On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:10:57AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Wed, 4 Mar 2015 00:13:01 +0100
From:Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de
Message-ID: 20150303231301.gb13...@britannica.bec.de
| It comes with a maintainance price. Add something better a
In article 20150303071552.gc27...@britannica.bec.de,
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
You are missing the most important part of my mail: why did this not go
to tech-userlevel first?
If we want to make every single change to go through tech-userlevel,
we should institute a rule
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want added?
In general:
Should we have more concrete commit rules, or do we prefer that current
status quo which is to leave things to people's judgement and occasionally
backout things when
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:58:56PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want added?
Bring it up on tech-userlevel.
In general:
Should we have more concrete commit rules, or do we prefer that current
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through tech-userlevel,
we should institute a rule to do so. To my knowledge we don't have yet
such a rule. We already have the rest of the p* programs which originated
in Solaris, we were missing this
Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel:
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through
tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my
knowledge we don't have yet such a rule. We already have the rest
of the p* programs
Am 03.03.15 um 21:32 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
I meant that adding to base was discuss-worthy because there's
a bloat or necessary question, not because of risk of
breakage.
Sure. So how much bloat is pwait? Is it a huge piece of
software or a small
Am 03.03.15 um 22:03 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
I think you contradict yourself, when you say a) new programs in
base are pretty rare, and b) we have too much commit first,
argue about appropriate later.
Both are true; some/most commit first discuss later
Am 03.03.15 um 21:22 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel:
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through
tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my
Am 03.03.15 um 16:58 schrieb Christos Zoulas:
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want added?
no.
In general:
Should we have more concrete commit rules, or do we prefer that current
status quo which is to leave things to
Am 03.03.15 um 17:49 schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:58:56PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want added?
Bring it up on tech-userlevel.
In general:
Should we have more
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
Am 03.03.15 um 14:35 schrieb Greg Troxel:
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
If we want to make every single change to go through
tech-userlevel, we should institute a rule to do so. To my
knowledge we don't have yet such a rule. We already
Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch writes:
I meant that adding to base was discuss-worthy because there's a
bloat or necessary question, not because of risk of breakage.
Sure. So how much bloat is pwait? Is it a huge piece of software
or a small utility? I think that matters a bit.
Posting a note
Date:Wed, 4 Mar 2015 00:13:01 +0100
From:Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de
Message-ID: 20150303231301.gb13...@britannica.bec.de
| It comes with a maintainance price. Add something better a version later
| and it is significantly harder to get rid of the
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:13:31PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 03.03.15 um 17:49 schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:58:56PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
For actionable items:
pwait:
Should I remove pwait or leave it? Are there any features you want
added?
On Mar 3, 8:35am, g...@ir.bbn.com (Greg Troxel) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/pwait
| We do sort of have a rule, which is that significant changes need
| discussion. I would say adding programs to base always counts. Other
| than that, it's trickier, but if there's
In article 20150303003710.ga20...@britannica.bec.de,
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:43:39PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:christos
Date:Mon Mar 2 21:43:39 UTC 2015
Added Files:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:43:39PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Mon Mar 2 21:43:39 UTC 2015
Added Files:
src/usr.bin/pwait: Makefile pwait.1 pwait.c
Log Message:
Add pwait, from FreeBSD
Please don't just import programs
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 02:35:49AM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article 20150303003710.ga20...@britannica.bec.de,
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:43:39PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
19 matches
Mail list logo
