Re: [SoX-devel] speexdsp includes

2024-06-07 Thread Taylor via SoX-devel
> > Again, m4a files exist and are common, so are you saying that sox should not > > be able to read them? > Nobody stops you from writing a m4a encoder and decoder. > > Idem WMA format, > Oh, you have that too? Cool. > > and that's without the M4A runes yet. Sox disapponted me here. > You should p

Re: [SoX-devel] speexdsp includes

2024-06-07 Thread Jan Stary
On Jun 07 05:59:48, martinw...@gmail.com wrote: > On 6/6/24 23:42, Jan Stary wrote: > > > > > > The header , included in speexdsp.c, > > > > > > in not even installed by speexdsp; this file is installed > > > > > > by speex, and is irrelevant to the speexdsp effect. > > > > > > > > > > In fact > >

Re: [SoX-devel] speexdsp includes

2024-06-06 Thread Martin Guy
On 6/6/24 23:42, Jan Stary wrote: The header , included in speexdsp.c, in not even installed by speexdsp; this file is installed by speex, and is irrelevant to the speexdsp effect. In fact speexenc audio.wav audio.spx sox audio.spx audio2.wav says sox FAIL formats: no handler

Re: [SoX-devel] speexdsp includes

2024-06-06 Thread Jan Stary
> > > > The header , included in speexdsp.c, > > > > in not even installed by speexdsp; this file is installed > > > > by speex, and is irrelevant to the speexdsp effect. > > > > > > In fact > > > speexenc audio.wav audio.spx > > > sox audio.spx audio2.wav > > > says > > > sox FAIL

Re: [SoX-devel] speexdsp includes

2024-06-06 Thread Martin Guy
On 6/6/24 19:05, Jan Stary wrote: On Jun 06 18:59:00, martinw...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/6/24 18:36, Jan Stary wrote: The header , included in speexdsp.c, in not even installed by speexdsp; this file is installed by speex, and is irrelevant to the speexdsp effect. In fact speexenc audio.wa

Re: [SoX-devel] speexdsp includes

2024-06-06 Thread Jan Stary
On Jun 06 18:59:00, martinw...@gmail.com wrote: > On 6/6/24 18:36, Jan Stary wrote: > > The header , included in speexdsp.c, > > in not even installed by speexdsp; this file is installed > > by speex, and is irrelevant to the speexdsp effect. > > > > The right file is (sic); > > but it doesn't ha

Re: [SoX-devel] speexdsp includes

2024-06-06 Thread Martin Guy
On 6/6/24 18:36, Jan Stary wrote: The header , included in speexdsp.c, in not even installed by speexdsp; this file is installed by speex, and is irrelevant to the speexdsp effect. The right file is (sic); but it doesn't have to be included, becasuse is gets included by which speexdsp.c alread

[SoX-devel] speexdsp includes

2024-06-06 Thread Jan Stary
The header , included in speexdsp.c, in not even installed by speexdsp; this file is installed by speex, and is irrelevant to the speexdsp effect. The right file is (sic); but it doesn't have to be included, becasuse is gets included by which speexdsp.c already includes. Apparently, nobody has