On 27/01/14 15:00, Michael Mraka wrote:
I've commited this part of timestamp changes with an exception of
moment-with-langs.min.js file.
It isn't referenced from pages (moment.min.js is), moreover it should not be
in
spacewalk-web but a separate package.
It is referenced from the JSP tag.
Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
%
% Attached is the first iteration of this patch.
%
% It includes:
%
% - Transformation logic moved to js so that it can be shared with perl
% or easily disabled (disabled not implemented yet)
% - A rhn:formatDate
% - allows to format in both moment.js
- I do like the screen shots and idea of making date/time stuff easier
to read - I've also seen people wanting date formatting displayed
changed. Just because their language is English, doesn't mean that
11/12/13 is clear to them - since in America is is 12th November and in
UK it is 11th
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:46:22AM -0500, Tomas Lestach wrote:
What I think to be great to have are options:
* timestamp according to locales
* 2013-12-31 as this is a format, that everybody understands
* simple parsing of d(d) m(m) yy(yy), their order and separator
Don't forget am/pm vs.
On 12/12/13 16:01, Cliff Perry wrote:
Of course, how much perl code is to remain, soon?
- So, that maybe is something that can be mitigated with plan to
continue converting perl pages to java.
That is a good question. We will also contribute more porting but we
have no immediate plan of a
The different time formats results even more problems.
I experienced a bug from the timezone handling in system.last_boot,
package install time and system-Requiring Reboot, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042909
But this is triggered because of different timestamps in the
On 09/12/13 07:45, Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
On 09/12/13 05:32, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
(and code attached)
Nice idea.
There is a problem with the general inconsistency of the date/time
displays, and part of it stems from the fact that Java does it
differently than Perl.
What is the proposal
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:14:13AM +0100, Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
While fixing glitches after the big merge, I have been looking for other
details that could make the user interface easier to the eyes.
One thing that immediately caught my attention was the amount of
timestamps we show
On 09/12/13 05:32, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
(and code attached)
Nice idea.
There is a problem with the general inconsistency of the date/time
displays, and part of it stems from the fact that Java does it
differently than Perl.
What is the proposal for the Perl side of the code base? If there
Hi Astronauts
While fixing glitches after the big merge, I have been looking for other
details that could make the user interface easier to the eyes.
One thing that immediately caught my attention was the amount of
timestamps we show in the user interface. Stuff like 15/10/13 08:13:33
EDT.
In
10 matches
Mail list logo
