[spctools-discuss] Re: XML_ONLY and CPAS

2009-05-20 Thread Brian Pratt
That's xinteract trying to do some preprocessing for the pepXML viewer, which of course isn't desirable for your purposes. You'll need to alter xinteract.cxx to skip that step (as will I in the SVN copy). As you can see it's been some time since CPAS and TPP got synchronized, but I'm happy to

[spctools-discuss] Re: XML_ONLY and CPAS

2009-05-20 Thread bill
Thanks for your offer. I gladly accept. I'll try rebuilding with the lines that run ProphetModels.pl and ProtProphetModels.pl commented out and let you know how it goes. Bill --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[spctools-discuss] Re: XML_ONLY and CPAS

2009-05-20 Thread bill
Okay, that worked. I also had to comment out the execution of PepXMLViewer.cgi. So, when ProteinProphet finishes it leaves behind a new file: java.io.IOException: Failed to remove work directory /raid/labkey/Test/ Human Standard/xtandem/test8/UPS1-01.work unexpected files found:

[spctools-discuss] Re: XML_ONLY and CPAS

2009-05-20 Thread Brian Pratt
I'm not sure what that's for. I'll ask some other developers. -Original Message- From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com [mailto:spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of bill Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:17 PM To: spctools-discuss Subject: [spctools-discuss] Re: XML_ONLY

[spctools-discuss] Re: XML_ONLY and CPAS

2009-05-20 Thread bill
I did try to use the trunk but I couldn't get it to compile on this machine. GCC4.4 was installed just recently and the conflicts make it tough going. Plus, I'm okay at commenting things out but I only have basic C++ skills. Judging by the comments in the code, the _senserr.txt file isn't needed

[spctools-discuss] Re: XML_ONLY and CPAS

2009-05-20 Thread Brian Pratt
to be inside the getIsInteractiveMode() check, I'll fix that in trunk as well. -Original Message- From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com [mailto:spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of bill Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:57 PM To: spctools-discuss Subject: [spctools-discuss] Re