Dear Natalie,
sorry for my last email. I had overseen that we have the wrong version
again.
Thank You again.
Natalie Tasman wrote:
Hello Dominik, Jimmy,
Besides my recommendation to try msconvert, which is the program with
more developer focus at this point, there is already a
That 742.5391 precursor mass is the monoisotopic m/z mass recorded in
the scan header of the raw file itself. readw just grabs this value,
if present, via the thermo interface. No way to turn this off in
readw (besides a relatively simple edit of the code and rebuilding the
binary).
Without
Yeah, I'd like to see the isolation window from the triggering survey
scan because it seems unlikely that the monoisotopic m/z would be less
accurate than the filter's isolation m/z (except it might pick the a+1
peak, but that's almost certainly still better than the isolation m/z).
-Matt
Dear Jimmy,
the problem is that Thermo software is not especially intelligent by
assigning the monoisotopic mass when a complex sample is analyzed. I
actually would like to have the converter not making this decision.
For that we have developed our own software.
Can I somehow switch that
Hello Dominik, Jimmy,
Besides my recommendation to try msconvert, which is the program with
more developer focus at this point, there is already a command-line
option in the 4.3 series ReAdW program. I'd added this feature
because Thermo's software did not understand which scan to report
