Re: [spctools-discuss] RefreshParser reports number of unmapped entries - why are there unmapped entries?

2019-01-30 Thread Hampton, Brian
Subject: Re: [spctools-discuss] RefreshParser reports number of unmapped entries - why are there unmapped entries? Hi Brian, It appears that all of the UNMAPPED results are to DECOY proteins. Is it possible that you regenerated the DECOYS at some point but kept the database name the same

Re: [spctools-discuss] RefreshParser reports number of unmapped entries - why are there unmapped entries?

2019-01-29 Thread David Shteynberg
Hi Brian, It appears that all of the UNMAPPED results are to DECOY proteins. Is it possible that you regenerated the DECOYS at some point but kept the database name the same? DECOYS get reshuffled so you are not guaranteed to have the same DECOYS peptides that you had the first time you

Re: [spctools-discuss] RefreshParser reports number of unmapped entries - why are there unmapped entries?

2019-01-29 Thread Hampton, Brian
Hi David, Thanks for having a look. I sent you a link to the interact…pep.xml and the database files to download at your convenience. Brian On Jan 29, 2019, at 1:09 PM, David Shteynberg mailto:david.shteynb...@systemsbiology.org>> wrote: Hi Brian, Can you post the files for me to trace

Re: [spctools-discuss] RefreshParser reports number of unmapped entries - why are there unmapped entries?

2019-01-29 Thread David Shteynberg
Hi Brian, Can you post the files for me to trace the execution of RefreshParser and troubleshoot the issue? Thanks, -David On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 7:24 AM Hampton, Brian wrote: > Hello, > > I cannot determine why RefreshParser would not be able to remap all > entries. Since the PSMs are