y, September 19, 2016 8:02 PM
> *To:* spctools-discuss@googlegroups com
> *Subject:* Re: [spctools-discuss] Question About iprophet/Spectral library
>
>
>
> I have never done the SpectraST search.
>
> When you create a consensus library using SpectraST, you actually
Thanks again! I will look into it.
On Monday, September 19, 2016 at 11:02:10 PM UTC-4, andyzcq wrote:
>
> I have never done the SpectraST search.
> When you create a consensus library using SpectraST, you actually removed
> redundant spectra. You can refer to Nature method paper about SpectraST.
] *On Behalf Of *???
*Sent:* Monday, September 19, 2016 8:02 PM
*To:* spctools-discuss@googlegroups com
*Subject:* Re: [spctools-discuss] Question About iprophet/Spectral library
I have never done the SpectraST search.
When you create a consensus library using SpectraST, you actually removed
I have never done the SpectraST search.
When you create a consensus library using SpectraST, you actually removed
redundant spectra. You can refer to Nature method paper about SpectraST.
Here is the link:
http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v5/n10/full/nmeth.1254.html
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:44
Hi
Thanks so much for your answers!
I created a library with Spectrast once without error but when I wanted to
do a spectral search with it, I got an error saying the library is corrupt
and when I tried to create the same library again, I received error each
time at different points during the
1.You can refer to the MCP paper about iProphet. Here is the link:
http://www.mcponline.org/content/10/12/M111.007690.long.
2. SpectraST can create a consensus library by removing the redundant
spectra. SpectraST can handle more than 225,000 spectra, and I used
SpectraST to process much more than t
