On 10/04/2008, Brad Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:40 AM, James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 10/04/2008, Vinay Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think that kind of misses the point. The *namespace* that google
> manages
> > > is no
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:40 AM, James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 10/04/2008, Vinay Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that kind of misses the point. The *namespace* that google
> manages
> > is now open for business as an OpenID provider. It's an unanticipated
> > side-
On 10/04/2008, Vinay Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that kind of misses the point. The *namespace* that google manages
> is now open for business as an OpenID provider. It's an unanticipated
> side-effect of the APIs.
>
> I think it's kind of a big deal, actually, in terms of how OpenID
Any sufficiently advanced web site system is indistinguishable from an OP.
Or, rather, can be turned into an OP. :)
Vinay Gupta wrote:
I think that kind of misses the point. The *namespace* that google
manages is now open for business as an OpenID provider. It's an
unanticipated side-effect
if and when Google manages its own namespace as OpenIDs, I hope they
provide more consistent QoS - I havent seen this one work yet
paul
Vinay Gupta wrote:
>
> I think that kind of misses the point. The *namespace* that google
> manages is now open for business as an OpenID provider. It's an
>
I think that kind of misses the point. The *namespace* that google
manages is now open for business as an OpenID provider. It's an
unanticipated side-effect of the APIs.
I think it's kind of a big deal, actually, in terms of how OpenID is
right from an engineering perspective and how it c
I agree. I think this is an excellent technology demonstration, but it is a
third-party, not Google, that is enabling the ID.
John
2008/4/9 Immad Akhund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> When Google eventually does make a proper OpenID provider all the OpenIDs
> provided by openid-provider.appspot.com wou
When Google eventually does make a proper OpenID provider all the OpenIDs
provided by openid-provider.appspot.com would not match.
Would get very confusing apart from advanced users that understand the
distinction.
Immad
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Paul Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I expect Google might have a (legal) opinion on characterizing this
application as 'Google OpenID'
I think I'll wait for Google itself to enable my Gmail as an OpenID.
paul
Vinay Gupta wrote:
> http://openid-provider.appspot.com/
>
> Somebody used their app hosting service and implemented an Op
http://openid-provider.appspot.com/
Somebody used their app hosting service and implemented an OpenID
provider.
That kind of changes things, doesn't it?
Vinay
--
Vinay Gupta - Designer, Hexayurt Project - an excellent public domain
refugee shelter system
Gizmo Project VOIP: 775-743
10 matches
Mail list logo
