On 06/18/2012 01:51 PM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>>
>>> The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer
>>> of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() br
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>
>> The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer
>> of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c.
>>
>> This patch adjusts to this change, using -E
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer
> of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c.
>
> This patch adjusts to this change, using -EPROBE_DEFER as indication to defer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland
On 06/18/2012 11:20 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer
> of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c.
>
> This patch adjusts to this change, using -EPROBE_DEFER as indication to defer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge
>
The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer
of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c.
This patch adjusts to this change, using -EPROBE_DEFER as indication to defer.
Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge
---
Applies to 3.5-rc3
Should this patch be joined with g
