uot; to steer the packet instead of using
"INTENT" value?
Thank you very much,
Linda Dunbar
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
Support WG adoption.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> on
behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 5:19 AM
To: SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>&
Joel,
I would be interested, especially your first task: interested in SRv6 and
compression but has not been involved in implementation nor reading the draft
repeatedly.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 11:11 AM
To: SPR
Weiqiang, clarence, Zhenbin, Bruno, and Francois,
Reading through the draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-08 for the first
time without prior engagement in the discussion, I think the document is well
written and clear. Here are some comments and questions:
Section 7.2 helps me the most in c
Francois,
Thank you very much for the explanation. Your amended text looks good to me.
Thank you,
Linda
From: Francois Clad
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 9:21 AM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: spring@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compress...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Review comments and
maybe the
SR ingress nodes need to use the longest possible SR header for Path MTU
Discovery packets? So that the original hosts can reduce the packet size no
matter which SR path is taken.
Thanks, Linda Dunbar
-邮件原件-
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ie
Support.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> On
Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 11:54 AM
To: SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-pr
et frames being encapsulated by SRH header?
The inner payload are IP frames, aren't they?
Thank you very much,
Linda Dunbar
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
e wireless network when the user enters the house. Does it
require UE be the SRv6 head node?
Most likely the home access network provider is different from the user's
mobile network provider, then this automatically switch over won't happen,
correct?
Th
Support.
Linda Dunbar
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 7:46 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG adoption call for draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment
Hi SPRING WG,
Authors of draft-voyer-spring-sr
Support,
Linda Dunbar
--
Dear SPRING WG:
This email starts a two week WG LC for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-i
I support the adoption.
Linda Dunbar
发件人: spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 James Guichard
[james.n.guich...@futurewei.com]
发送时间: 2020年7月14日 5:52
收件人: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
抄送: spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@iet
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
I think it is a really good idea for each Virtual Network to have its own SIDs.
A couple questions to the authors:
Page 9: Figure 1: The Red network has same SID on A & B for the path between
them. But between B & E there are different SIDs. Is it intende
Support,
Linda Dunbar
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 8:52 PM
To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Cc: ippm-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:ippm-cha...@ietf.org>;
spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-
Support the WG Adoption.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 1:39 AM
To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WG Adopt
network) to achieve the desired QoS for the premium services.
In addition, with zero rating (or zero rating +) applications increase, the
future may call for more premium VPN+ services.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:47 AM
To: spring
Slicing. For example, can
SR allows a subscriber to specify their traffic not to be shared on link/nodes
with others?
Best regards,
Linda Dunbar
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
independently from other Network Slices.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring On Behalf Of Greg Mirsky
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 4:02 PM
To: Adrian Farrel
Cc: James Guichard ; spring ;
spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] When we have multiple proposals addressing the same problem
[Re: WG Adoption Call
I have read the draft. I think it is very useful to have a solution that
integrates the Network Server Header and the Segment routing.
I support the publication.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.de
can be connected by the third party network (e.g., Internet)?
Are the two SR islands under the same administrative control? i.e., Are the SID
used by SR Island-1 recognized by nodes within the SR Island-2 ?
Thank you.
Linda Dunbar
___
spring mailing
that the original
Binding SID doesn't?
Thank you
Linda Dunbar
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 10:54 PM
To: draft-li-spring-tunnel-segm...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: some questions about draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-02
Zhenbin, Cheng, and Nan,
Section 3.2 o
I have finished reading the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-09. I
think the draft is written very clear.
I support the WGLC.
Best Regards,
Linda Dunbar
On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 9:57:11 PM GMT+3, James Guichard
mailto:james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>> wrote:
D
Yes, support.
Best regards,
Linda Dunbar
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 8:34 PM
To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WG Adopt
I support adoption.
Linda Dunbar
On Sep 10, 2021, at 12:16 PM, Ron Bonica
mailto:rbonica=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org>>
wrote:
Bruno,
When a WG adopts a design team draft, I assume that the draft becomes subject
to the following guidelines from RFC7221:
“Once a working group ad
With multiple vendors having implemented the solution, I strongly support the
adoption of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring On Behalf Of Keyur Patel
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 12:48 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) ; James Guichard
; SPRING WG
Cc: spring
y's small office environment?
Don't most small offices have uplinks to one or two PEs?
Linda Dunbar
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
I support the adoption of this document.
Best regards,
Linda Dunbar
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rob Shakir
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 11:20 PM
To: SPRING WG List mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for
draft-filsfils-
Hi Rob,
My suggestions (& comments) are inserted below.
Linda
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2018 11:44 AM
To: Rob Shakir ; SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter
Hi Rob,
Looks good, few additions,
the protocol specification, if it's in
PCEP, then it's done in that WG.
From: Rob Shakir [mailto:ro...@google.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2018 4:32 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: Jeff Tantsura ; SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter
Hi Linda,
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 a
(
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks-01.txt
). Will our draft be considered as the “new applications” in SPRING charter?
Thanks, Linda Dunbar.
From: Rob Shakir [mailto:ro...@google.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2018 4:32 PM
To: Linda Dunbar mailto:linda
Hi Bruno,
I would like to get a 10 minute slot to present
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks-01.txt
Speaker will be myself.
Thanks!
Linda Dunbar
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
expect all network to be IPv6 from Day 1.
Sincerely hope you can add those minor wording to the bullet.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 7:52 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] Updating the
...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 8:56 AM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: SPRING WG List
Subject: RE: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter
Linda,
Thanks for the feedback.
Please see inline [Bruno]
From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dun...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday
How about “Interworking SR with existing networks”?
Linda
From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 10:20 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; bruno.decra...@orange.com
Cc: SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter
Linda,
“Legacy Networks” is
ly one or two 3rd party hops are between SD-WAN end points and PE and
those hops may not even use Entropy (like LTE links); or
2) Grouping Applications by UDP ports may enforce same application traverse
through same route, which is acceptable by many deployment scenario
es a
method for Service Provider to attract flows which would otherwise traverse
public internet, to traverse its own domain.
Linda
From: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 4:50 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [sp
have all network to
be SR from Day 1.
Bruno said “existing networks” vs “existing routing solutions” are equally
good, and the charter wording is now at your hand.
We hope you can change the wording.
Thank you very much.
Linda Dunbar
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra
Jeff,
Replies are inserted below:
From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 5:36 PM
To: Linda Dunbar ; Robert Raszuk
Cc: SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] solicit feedback on
draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks-02 proposing SD-WAN source node
AM
To: Jeff Tantsura
Cc: Linda Dunbar ; SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] solicit feedback on
draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks-02 proposing SD-WAN source node
using UDP port to indicate to SR ingress node how to map to appropriate Binding
SID
Hello Jeff,
“What exactly do you
-a and other flows towards egress
PE-b.
Linda Dunbar
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 3:09 PM
To: 'Robert Raszuk' ; Jeff Tantsura
Cc: SPRING WG List
Subject: RE: [spring] solicit feedback on
draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks-02 proposing SD-WAN source node
u
E quality.
-There have been a lot of discussion on the SPRING mailing list for the
draft. We would like to summary the discussion at the meeting time.
Thank you very much.
Linda Dunbar
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 6:06 PM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
Su
;SEC 1", "SEC 2" etc. are meant for Identifying "Basic Security".
Can you use a "SEC-1", or "SEC-REQ-1", etc. to make it easier for cross
reference from other documents?
Thanks, Linda Dunbar
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
Support,
Linda Dunbar
-Original Message-
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:48 AM
To: Loa Andersson ; spring@ietf.org;
draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segm...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] to progress draft
Support,
Linda Dunbar
On 2019-02-20, 4:01 AM, "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
wrote:
Hi SPRING WG,
This email initiates a two week call for working group adoption for
draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment.
Please indicate your support, comments, or objection, fo
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit o
Bruno,
Sorry for the late request, possible to add 5 minutes for the update to the
following draft?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks/
Thank you,
Linda Dunbar
-Original Message-
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Support,
Linda Dunbar
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:50 AM
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> wrote:
Hi authors, SPRING WG,
In parallel to the call for adoption for
draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming (1), we would like to poll for
IPR.
If you are aware of IPR that appl
Support,
Linda Dunbar
From: spring mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> On
Behalf Of Rob Shakir
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:14 AM
To: SPRING WG List mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call: draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming
Hi SPRING WG,
This email
Rob,
I support adoption.
Linda Dunbar
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:14 AM Rob Shakir
mailto:40google@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
Hi SPRING WG,
This email initiates a two week working group adoption call for
draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr. This follows the discussion that we had in the
la
Rob and Bruno:
Can we request a 10-minute slot for SPRING for SDWAN? We have been working on
merging the following drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dukes-spring-sr-for-sdwan/
Linda
From: spring On Behalf
SD-WAN, as described by ONUG (Open Network User Group), is about pooling WAN
bandwidth from multiple service providers to get better WAN bandwidth
management, visibility & control.
Because of the ephemeral property of the selected Cloud DCs, an enterprise or
its network service provider may not
Sorry, I meant to ask:
When the SDWAN edge nodes are NOT directly connected to the PEs of SR domain,
is it appropriate for SDWAN edge nodes to use GRE/VxLAN header bits to indicate
the desired SR Path?
Linda
From: spring On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2019 5:11 PM
To
, July 09, 2019 1:45 AM
To: spring ; Linda Dunbar
; SPRING WG
Subject: Re: [spring] Seeking comments for
draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks: is it appropriate for not-directly
connect SDWAN edges to use GRE/VxLAN header bits to indicate the desired SR
path?
Hi Linda,
Why not directly use
Bruno,
Why SPRING not request more time for IETF105?
SPRING had more time request than the WG session in IETF104. It happens again
for IETF105.
Many WGs have multiple sessions, e.g. IDR has 3 sessions in IETF105; RTGwg has
2 sessions in IETF105, etc.
Linda Dunbar
From: spring [mailto:spring
draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip?
Linda
From: Jeff Tantsura
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2019 4:03 PM
To: spring ; Linda Dunbar
; SPRING WG ; 徐小虎(义先)
Subject: Re: [spring] Seeking comments for
draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks: is it appropriate for not-directly
connect SDWAN edges to use GRE
NG WG ; 徐小虎(义先)
; Linda Dunbar
Subject: RE: [spring] Seeking comments for
draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks: is it appropriate for not-directly
connect SDWAN edges to use GRE/VxLAN header bits to indicate the desired SR
path?
Linda,
What you want is to use native MPLS when ava
: spring ; SPRING WG ; 徐小虎(义先)
; Linda Dunbar
Subject: RE: [spring] Seeking comments for
draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks: is it appropriate for not-directly
connect SDWAN edges to use GRE/VxLAN header bits to indicate the desired SR
path?
Linda,
In context of draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over
SPRING chairs,
Can we get 10 minutes slot for briefing the following draft?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks/
Speaker: Linda Dunbar
We will submit the updated draft before the cutoff date and start the
discussion on the mailing list too.
Linda
From
Bruno, and Peng ShuPing,
I requested a presentation slot on Oct 29 (see the attached email), is it
neglect or intentional of not having it on the SPRING agenda?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks/
Speaker: Linda Dunbar
Possible to add it to Thursday
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
60 matches
Mail list logo
