Support,
Linda Dunbar -----Original Message----- From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:48 AM To: Loa Andersson <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [spring] to progress draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment I have just read the draft and agree that it should be adopted by the WG. It solves an important problem in instrumenting and protecting an SR path. It should be noted that we needed to do something very similar in mainstream MPLS via the synonymous label work which is already adopted. However SL did not address the SR case. We therefore need this path label work to be progressed. - Stewart On 10/02/2019 08:11, Loa Andersson wrote: > Working Group, > > I have reviewed draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment and as far as I > can see, it is ready for wg adoption. > > There were some comments in Bangkok, but due to the many collisions > between working groups at that meeting I couldn't attend the SPRING > f2f. > > The minutes are not clear, but as far as I understand, there is > nothing that can't be resolved in the wg process. > > /Loa _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
