RE: Split-Ring Hanger

2007-11-05 Thread Russell
Where I was going with this was that a hanger has to be listed for the use of supporting sch. ? steel pipe (in this case), not necessarily specifically sprinkler pipe. Then by that you are in essence engineering that hanger to be used with sprinkler pipe, thus the 5x So now what you have is a

RE: Listed

2007-11-05 Thread Bill Minkel
MY general feeling is that most, if not all, AHJ's are not going to buy that logic. To me Listed means approved for use in Fire Protection Service or certified to meet the requirements of some NFPA Standard by some organization recognized or authorized to do such. For example If I could persuade

RE: ESFR design area

2007-11-05 Thread Scott A. Futrell
Commentary in 2007 handbook states, The number of sprinklers to be calculated on a branch line is unclear, but using the rule for 1.2 times the square root of the design area would seem appropriate, even if not explicitly stated in NFPA 13. Scott (763) 425-1001 Office (612) 759-0796 Cell

RE: Listed

2007-11-05 Thread Russell
Please do, I agree that more depth needs to be put to this subject of listing. Ron -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Minkel Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:10 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Listed MY general

RE: Listed

2007-11-05 Thread Bill Minkel
Sure, I agree with you John and your explanation goes into greater depth than I can afford to expend so I am grateful for that. I'm just a grunt, I do the design, my bottom line is that split-ring hangers are not Listed in the sense of NFPA-13, 2002 9.1.1.4.1. Bill Minkel, Designer Member NFPA

RE: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread George Church
Standpipe in each stair, interconnected at bottom, FHV at each intermediate landing, one FDC, until Steve gets in and tells me I'm wong. If by zone you're thinking of a high-rise, you're not going to need zones in a 6-story. But, in advance, What Steve says. glc -Original Message-

RE: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread George Church
Well, I think its 75' tall or having characteristics that require a fire be fought internally. Standpipe zones are vertical, not horizontal. And just because you're 80' high doesn't mean you have to have zones- but we don't see a lot of high rise work in central PA. hence my deferring to

Re: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread Steve Leyton
Zones are a vertical separation between standpipes with water supply connections for each. Your application will be a single vertical zone with 4 standpipes. If it's not classified as a high-rise, you will need one FDC, arranged so that it will charge all of the standpipes, i.e. upstream of

Re: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread Steve Leyton
If it's a high-rise, you'll need two FDC's, but it will still be a single zone as George says. As for deferring, all I can say is give him room on the hairpins. My opinion only ... Steve Leyton Away from the office - sent from my BlackBerry -Original Message- From: George Church

RE: Supervisory Alarm - Low Air

2007-11-05 Thread Mike Brown (TECH- GVL)
The monitoring of a high pressure is not in NFPA 13 or any other NFPA Pamphlet except in NFPA 72, and the NFPA 13 Committee has never seen fit to put it in NFPA 13. I have never met anyone that could tell me why it was in NFPA 72. Mike Brown -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread Russell
One instance would be if you had a stair shaft that had two exit doors on each floor, one opposite the other. One door led into a zone on one side of the star and the other door led into a zone on the other side of the star. These two zones would be separated with a rated firewall. Just one of

RE: RE:Clean room sprinkler heads w/ covers

2007-11-05 Thread Mike Brown (TECH- GVL)
Just for your info. Reliable still makes a Sealing Concealer with a gasket but it is not quick response or FM Approved. Check the Reliable website www.reliablesprinkler.com Mike Brown -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Cabral Sent:

Re: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't agree that the situation you describe would constitute a different zone. The definition of zone in NFPA-14, 3.3.13, indicates it to be a vertical subdivision of a standpipe, determined by the pressure limitations of the system components. More guidance is provided in the annex,

RE: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread Tom Duross
What Ken says. Your standpipe load with be either 1000 GPM or 1250, depending on fully sprinklered or not. Make sure you perform standpipe hydraulics and size your FDC and supply accordingly. I assume the standpipes are 6. Tom Duross I don't agree that the situation you describe would

RE: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread A.P.Silva
Why would you need a 6 standpipe for a 6 storey building? Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Duross Sent: November 5, 2007 5:09 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Standpipe Zones What Ken says. Your standpipe

RE: Standpipe Zones

2007-11-05 Thread Tom Duross
Try getting 1000 GPM at 100 PSI out of a three 2 1/2 FDV's through a siamese and a 4 standpipe up 75' with no more than 150/175 at the FDC. That's why. Tom Why would you need a 6 standpipe for a 6 storey building? Tony What Ken says. Your standpipe load with be either 1000 GPM or 1250,

Light Hazard with sprinklers at 5' by 10'.

2007-11-05 Thread Allan Seidel
For me this is a silly question because it means considering a smaller design area but I'll ask it anyway in case there is something I am missing. This is a light hazard situation where the ceiling, if you can call it that, is above 20 feet and it drives the sprinkler spacing to 5' by 10'.

RE: Light Hazard with sprinklers at 5' by 10'.

2007-11-05 Thread A.P.Silva
Assuming a wet system, you are right, minimum 30 heads. You could use small orifice sprinklers that might help in your situation. Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Seidel Sent: November 5, 2007 8:46 PM To: