RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Mike Brown (TECH- GVL)
, 2008 5:08 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions I love these discussions cause I get to hear about the problems that the contractors have in designing these systems. Guess what...we (the AHJ) have the same problems trying to approve

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Steve Leyton
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions My point is that the NFPA 13D Committee should provide guidelines to follow in these situations. I do not care if they say calculate the room to light hazard as long as they put it in writing. But the way it is now

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Eckard, Mark - Mark E
Re: obstruction to sprinkler spray pattern development in 13-D. First lets take a look at the purpose of NFPA-13D. Chapter 1.2 prevent flash over and to allow the occupants to escape during the 10 minute water supply. If too many sprinklers are operating in an area that has been

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Thom McMahon
. 2560 Copper Ridge Dr Steamboat Springs, CO 80488-2136 Tel: 970-879-7952 Fax: 970-879-7926 - Original Message - From: Steve Leyton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 7:42 AM Subject: RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions What

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Ron Greenman
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Brown (TECH- GVL) Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 6:10 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions My point is that the NFPA 13D Committee should provide guidelines

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread bigtnp
Message- From: Eckard, Mark - Mark E [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Sent: Wed, 7 May 2008 10:30 am Subject: RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions Re: obstruction to sprinkler spray pattern development in 13-D. First lets take a look at the purpose of NFPA

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Steve Leyton
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Brown (TECH- GVL) Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 6:10 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions My point is that the NFPA 13D Committee

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Eckard, Mark - Mark E
, May 07, 2008 11:20 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions Hi Mark, Your questions about the intent an function, even with some blocked spray pattern were concerns during the sloped and beamed ceiling testing that was done.? The Tyco

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Thom McMahon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 9:35 AM Subject: RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions Except that we absolutely positively don't want to defer to 13. I get ___ Sprinklerforum mailing

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-07 Thread Ron Greenman
Bob, Just to throw one of those ever present Pacific Northwest dark clouds into the mix I was talking to a guy from Tyco at a seminar a couple of months ago and asked if they had any conclusions regarding that report. He said that they hadn't been able to reproduce the result since that first

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread Todd Williams - FPDC
Bob, I've got a similar situation in a building with residential sprinklers designed to NFPA 13, only with soffits. Four sprinklers in a 60 sqft bathroom seems excessive. So far I haven't come up with anything to let me eliminate sprinklers. IAt 12:51 PM 5/6/2008, you wrote: I'm working

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread Joe Burtell
Look at Tyco's residential design guide for beams and pockets for their residential sprinklers. Best regards, Joe Burtell, SET, CFPS Burtell Fire Protection, Inc. Phone: 406.652.7697 Fax: 406.652.7743 Cell: 406.861.4507 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.burtellfire.com

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob, Is there a specific reason you can't use the type of residential sprinklers which are allowed to be installed either drilled through the beams, or installed adjacent to the bottom of the beams? From what you've described it seems as though the maximum depth of the pockets isn't more

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread Jamie Seidl
Some res heads will let you go 8 below the ceiling. With a 6 beam, stick one in the beam and let it go. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Knight Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:52 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject:

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread John O'Connor
Bob, Refer to Tyco data sheet TFP400 (for the LFII), page 4 of 8 where they discuss Beam Ceiling Design Criteria. You should be able to locate the heads in the bottom of the beams and avoid the pockets for obvious reasons. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread Thom McMahon
Bob: We run into this all the time. First question are the beams structural? If the beams are decorative only drill the beams use your concealed heads and space as normal. While the beam rules for TYCO are ok, they have a lot of situations where you would have to tell the Arch. how to layout

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread Owen Evans
Hi Bob, I know you're using concealed but would your customer accept a sidewall in the beamed rooms? Owen Bob Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/06/08 9:50 AM I'm working on a home (13D) that has several rooms with the ceiling broken up by beam pockets. These vary in width from 2'8 to 3'3 o.c. with

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread Mike Brown (TECH- GVL)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thom McMahon Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 2:03 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions Bob: We run into this all the time. First question are the beams structural? If the beams

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread Thom McMahon
-2136 Tel: 970-879-7952 Fax: 970-879-7926 - Original Message - From: Mike Brown (TECH- GVL) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:58 PM Subject: RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions The NFPA 13D Committee in their wisdom

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread rahe . loftin
Please ignore. Sent to wrong party. Rahe Loftin - Original Message - From: rahe.loftin Sent: 05/06/2008 03:16 PM EST To: sprinklerforum sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions Please call them and tell them I am on the way

RE: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread Matsuda, Richard
I love these discussions cause I get to hear about the problems that the contractors have in designing these systems. Guess what...we (the AHJ) have the same problems trying to approve them. I remembered a similar discussion saying something about not allowing them to build something that you

Re: Residential Sprinklers and Beam Obstructions

2008-05-06 Thread IPA
Sometimes, no matter how ridiculous it seems, it's better to just to install them in every pocket then at least you're covered liability wise. Also, when you get into these high dollar luxury homes with beams, slopes, fireplaces in every room etc.. aesthetics plays a very important role and the