Sometimes, no matter how ridiculous it seems, it's better to just to install them in every pocket then at least you're covered liability wise. Also, when you get into these high dollar luxury homes with beams, slopes, fireplaces in every room etc.. aesthetics plays a very important role and the homeowner will usually want a ton of flat plate concealed sprinklers VS. four 'uglies' sticking out of the beams. I can't say I'd blame them when forking over large amounts of money just to have the ugliest sprinklers on the market installed in the most conspicuous places in the most extravagant rooms in the house.....
On 5/6/08, Bob Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm working on a home (13D) that has several rooms with the ceiling broken > up by "beam pockets". These vary in width from 2'8" to 3'3" o.c. with the > beams being 6" deep. Concealed residential sprinklers are being used. In > one room, which is 224 sf, if I place a sprinkler in every pocket like I > think I should, there will be 13 sprinklers. This averages out to 17 sf > per > head. Another room is 375 sf and will require 10 sprinklers. This > averages > at 37.5 per head. In rooms of this size do I really need a sprinkler in > every pocket? Can a sprinkler be placed in every other pocket and be > acceptable? Has anyone else found a better way to protect rooms like > this? > Any and all suggestions will help. > > Thanks, > > Bob Knight, CET > (208) 318-3057 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.firebyknight.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
