RE: [EXTERNAL] Peat Plant

2022-01-26 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
Is this is a storage area or part of a processing area, different hazards are present depending on specifics. Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection | craig.pr...@jacobs.com | www.jacobs.com 1041 East Butler Road Greenville, South Carolina 29606 CONTACT BY: email or MS

Peat Plant

2022-01-26 Thread Tony Silva via Sprinklerforum
Anyone know the commodity classification for peat? Or the classification that had been used on a previous project? Thanks, in advance. Tony ___ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum
That's what we are going through at the moment... I believe there are only 3-5 of these in the building, nothing crazy. Ron, there are two 5 foot cubes. The one on top is filled with the liquid, the bottom one is empty (used a spill containment container) -Original Message- From:

Re: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Ron Greenman via Sprinklerforum
Did I miss something? I thought you said 5 groups of 5x5x5 cubes stacked 2 high. That's only 125 sqft. Wouldn't it be cheaper to make a separate space, either with two hour walls or to just extend the coverage beyond the area with the higher demand as per NFPA. The solution seems so obvious and

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
The liquid is a corrosive, non-issue from our perspective. I would wager they don't have adequate secondary containment or spill control within the room where these are stored which is why they're using these IBC containment units. I'd be curious how many totes do they store in this area? If

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum
I'm not sure if attachments are allowed, if yes this is the situation... I believe the liquid is classified as a low commodity, leaving the plastic containers as the driving force... ok, I'm on board with this. We are trying to reduce the overall plastic height or commodity classification...

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
You don't have 5 ft of commodity. The liquid within the tote is irrelevant to the hazard. You essentially have a plastic hazard that is 10 ft in height. Now, there are some schools of thought that derate the level of hazard due to the liquid acting as a heat sink and thereby providing a

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Kyle.Montgomery via Sprinklerforum
Yeah, but the commodity is really the plastic container, right? Is the open-top container/tote still an issue from code standpoint if it's only ever on the lowest level? I thought the real problem with open-top containers that catch water was when they are above ground level. In this case, the

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum
Thank you everyone who replied, it appears it's not as clear cut as one would think lol. The plastic tote below does have a solid top, but I would assume there would be opening in the cover to allow any spillage or leaks to fall into the vessel. And allow any sprinkler water to fill the

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Art Tiroly via Sprinklerforum
Is the spill container open top? That will be an issue. These sound like plastic totes. If the liquid is not combustible the empty tote is still a lot of plastic Art -Original Message- From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Scott Futrell via Sprinklerforum Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Scott Futrell via Sprinklerforum
Totally agree. Just checking. Scott   Office: (763) 425-1001 x 2 Cell: (612) 759-5556 -Original Message- From: Prahl, Craig/GVL Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 9:15 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Steve Mackinnon ; Scott Futrell ; Mike Hairfield Subject: RE:

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
I would be addressing this as plastic storage since the liquid is a non-flammable/combustible liquid and there is the presence of empty plastic containers. Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection | craig.pr...@jacobs.com | www.jacobs.com 1041 East Butler Road Greenville,

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum
It's a non flammable, non combustible liquid. Sodium hydroxide 10 N The storage container and empty vessel are one time use only. There would be no cleaning of containers for use again. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Scott Futrell via

RE: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Scott Futrell via Sprinklerforum
You didn't mention what the liquid is. If it is a hazardous material as recognized by the International Fire Code then the 'empty' container is still considered full unless completely cleaned. Scott   Office: (763) 425-1001 x 2 Cell: (612) 759-5556 -Original Message- From:

Re: question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Mike Hairfield via Sprinklerforum
It should be 10 feet even though the other container is empty it's still plastic. Mike From: Sprinklerforum on behalf of Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 9:02 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Steve

question about Storage height

2022-01-26 Thread Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum
Good morning all, We have a storage situation where the liquid commodity is in a 5 foot plastic storage cube, with an equally sized empty plastic container below. The empty container below is only there to act as a spill collection vessel. The question our office has been banging around,