RE: FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-25 Thread John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum
Mike B Morey via Sprinklerforum Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 10:07 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Mike B Morey Subject: Re: FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet NFPA 13 has contained this in the appendix in varying locations since the dawn of time (or at least since I was 4 years

RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-25 Thread John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum
mber 25, 2019 7:52 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Matt Grise Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Have they ever clarified what kind of “confusion” they are trying to avoid? Is there a difference in how a fire department deals with a wet system vs a dry system?

Re: FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-25 Thread Mike B Morey via Sprinklerforum
e: 09/24/2019 03:08 PM Subject: FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Sent by:"Sprinklerforum" BE ADVISED - This email originated outside EMCOR. From: John Paulsen Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 10:06 AM To: Sprinklerforum Subject: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Good Day Everyone!

RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-25 Thread Michael Hill via Sprinklerforum
] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman via Sprinklerforum Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 5:08 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Ron Greenman Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Mike, that would be a non-functional fire protection device that has the appearance of functioning

RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-25 Thread Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Ron Greenman Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Mike, that would be a non-functional fire protection device that has the appearance of functioning as described in 901.4.5 and would be required to be removed as proscribed therein. This DPV though

Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread Ron Greenman via Sprinklerforum
ike Hill > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: > sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] *On Behalf Of *Ron > Greenman via Sprinklerforum > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 24, 2019 3:54 PM > *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > *Cc:* Ron Greenman > *Sub

RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread Michael Hill via Sprinklerforum
Sprinklerforum Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 3:54 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Ron Greenman Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Mark, I think that you're referencing 901.4.5 (in the 2012 edition of the IFC) but that is addressing systems that appear to be life safety

RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum
ject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Mark, I think that you're referencing 901.4.5 (in the 2012 edition of the IFC) but that is addressing systems that appear to be life safety or fire protection systems but don't function as such. A common example is a camera disguised as a sprinkler

Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread Bruce Verhei via Sprinklerforum
ps via Sprinklerforum > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 2:33 PM > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > Cc: Mark.Phelps > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet > > There is an obscure section in the fire code that essentially says you’re not > allowed to have anything

Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread Ron Greenman via Sprinklerforum
-614-449-2101 Ext. 3367 > > F-614-449-2007 > > C-614-348-8206 > > > > > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [ > mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org > ] *On Behalf Of *Mark.Phelps > via Sprinklerforum > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 24, 2019 3:15 PM > *To

RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread Hinson, Ryan via Sprinklerforum
ay, September 24, 2019 3:15 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> Cc: Mark.Phelps mailto:mphe...@aerofire.com>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Just curious, but wouldn’t it be about the same to just replace the valve wit

Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread Mark.Phelps via Sprinklerforum
nklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> Cc: Mark.Phelps mailto:mphe...@aerofire.com>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Just curious, but wouldn’t it be about the same to just replace the valve with a spool? Sent from my iPhone

Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread Don Casey via Sprinklerforum
would removing the clapper void the listing? On Sep 24, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Mark.Phelps via Sprinklerforum wrote:  Just curious, but wouldn’t it be about the same to just replace the valve with a spool? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2019, at 12:08 PM, John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum

RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum
RNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Just curious, but wouldn’t it be about the same to just replace the valve with a spool? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2019, at 12:08 PM, John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>> wrote: From: John Paulsen Sen

Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread Mark.Phelps via Sprinklerforum
Just curious, but wouldn’t it be about the same to just replace the valve with a spool? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2019, at 12:08 PM, John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>> wrote: From: John Paulsen Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 10:06 AM To:

FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

2019-09-24 Thread John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum
From: John Paulsen Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 10:06 AM To: Sprinklerforum Subject: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet Good Day Everyone! A question has come up regarding the practice of taking the clapper out of a dry pipe valve in order to convert the system from dry pipe to wet pipe. We have