Run, don't walk.
At 09:16 AM 11/6/2012, you wrote:
Found something new in a FP spec that I think is worth sharing. Spec's are
copyrighted by a nationally known FP consultant.
Excessive assistance provided by the Architect/General Contractor to the
Contractor, at the Contractor's request,
And the definition of 'excessive' always varies depending on what side of
the fence you are on. I would not want the 'consultant' defining excessive
in this case!
Cliff Whitfield, SET
President
Fire Design, Inc.
Ph: 337-261-8807
Fx: 337-261-8808
cl...@fire-design.com
www.fire-design.com
So are Architects/General Contractor going to start back charging for RFI's? I
have had projects with 8 RFI's because of issues with the bid documents and the
classic statement on the drawing, Contractor shall not deviate without written
approval.
Dan Failla
Our Town Fire Sprinkler Designs
-Original Message-
From: Failla, Daniel [mailto:fail...@charleston-sc.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 8:37 AM
To: 'sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org'
Subject: RE: Project Specifications
So are Architects/General Contractor going to start back charging for RFI's? I
have had projects with 8
: Failla, Daniel fail...@charleston-sc.gov
To: 'sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org' sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Sent: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 14:36:58 GMT+00:00
Subject: RE: Project Specifications
So are Architects/General Contractor going to start back charging for RFI's? I
have had projects with 8 RFI's
will not be back charged.
Bv
Sent from my Motorola ATRIX™ 4G on ATT
-Original message-
From: Failla, Daniel fail...@charleston-sc.gov
To: 'sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org' sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Sent: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 14:36:58 GMT+00:00
Subject: RE: Project Specifications
So
. | PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN
-Original Message-
From: Ron Greenman [mailto:rongreen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:57 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Project Specifications
Or perhaps less than normal assistance can be billed extra. I asked for a small
soda
...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 10:57 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Project Specifications
Or perhaps less than normal assistance can be billed extra. I asked for a small
soda
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Project Specifications
If we were writing Code, someone would have yelled out Undefinable and we
wouldn't have put it in the document.
If the firm issuing this is competent, I don't see a problem. They're just as
frustrated trying to educate some unwashed
While I understand what David and some others are saying about excessive RFI's
from incompetent sprinkler companies etc I believe that your post points out
what most of know to be true the majority of the time Most RFI's are
created by sprinkler companies needing information that wasn't
: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Rod DiBona
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 1:18 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Project Specifications
While I understand what David and some others are saying about excessive
@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Project Specifications
While I understand what David and some others are saying about excessive RFI's
from incompetent sprinkler companies etc I believe that your post points out
what most of know to be true the majority of the time Most RFI's are
created by sprinkler
12 matches
Mail list logo
