the cpu and disk I/O patterns which led me to think that a sync was
being done, so it must be some issue specific to the first host unrelated to
Sqlite.
Thanks for your response!
Bob
From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>
To: Bob Price <rjp_em...@
It appears that regardless of a "pragma synchronous=off" that there are still
syncs to disk done at key points in WAL mode such as in a "pragma
wal_checkpoint(RESTART)". I think that this is true based on the application
cpu and disk I/O patterns I observe when logging shows the wal checkpoint
I asked this last Friday evening (which probably wasn't a good time) and didn't
get any responses, so I thought I would try one more time. I apologize for the
duplication.
This is a question to ask about a particular Sqlite usage configuration to see
if it is appropriate or how to make it
This is a question to ask about a particular Sqlite configuration to see if it
is appropriate or how to make it better.
A brief sketch of the processing need is that I have one process managing a lot
of "item" data in a Sqlite db, and occasionally there is a need to walk through
all items and
this
question to this group.
I appreciate everyone's help. I will continue to debug and experiment and any
advice is welcome!
Bob
From: Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com>
To: Bob Price <rjp_em...@yahoo.com>; General Discussion of SQLite Database
&
Yes, I have run this on SSD drives and on a ram disk where disk IO wasn't a
limited factor.
Bob
From: Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>
To: Bob Price <rjp_em...@yahoo.com>; General Discussion of SQLite Database
<sqlite-users@sqlite.org&g
I've been searching through the archive without much luck on this topic, so
I'll ask my question. If this has been answered somewhere else please point me
to that.
I have a single process that independently opens and uses multiple Sqlite
databases, each with its own connection. The data in
7 matches
Mail list logo