Teg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> dhc> Recompile version 3.5.2 with -DSQLITE_MEMORY_SIZE=1000
> dhc> or however much memory you want SQLite to use. This will
> dhc> create a static array of char[] of size 1000 (or whatever
> dhc> other size you give it) and use that instead of malloc()
Hello drh,
Thursday, November 8, 2007, 3:03:07 PM, you wrote:
dhc> PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am using Windows Task Manager to determine memory usage. I minimize my
>> application (which causes the task manager to show a more accurate
>> measurement of memory used) and still the
Hello Trevor,
Thursday, November 8, 2007, 5:48:59 PM, you wrote:
TT> On 11/8/07, PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am using Windows Task Manager to determine memory usage. I minimize my
>> application (which causes the task manager to show a more accurate
>> measurement of memory used)
On Nov 8, 2007 5:04 PM, PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using Windows Task Manager to determine memory usage. I minimize my
> application (which causes the task manager to show a more accurate
> measurement of memory used) and still the memory usage is enormous.
Windows Task Manager
PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using Windows Task Manager to determine memory usage. I minimize my
> application (which causes the task manager to show a more accurate
> measurement of memory used) and still the memory usage is enormous.
>
>
Recompile version 3.5.2 with
Actually, I am. I abstract the database communication in my application,
but I access each database using their native API.
On Nov 8, 2007 12:44 PM, Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Are you certain it's sqlite RAM, and not your application?"
--- PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Are you certain it's sqlite RAM, and not your application?"
>
> Yes, we are also testing PostgreSQL and MySQL and the application memory
> with those stays < 20 mb.
You're not using the sqlite3 API directly, are you?
If that's the case, I think your
w.pokertracker3.com
On Nov 8, 2007 11:59 AM, Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to see if SQLite is suitable for large databases ( > 1 gb,
> > millions of rows in each of several tables). Initially, the memory
>
I am using Windows Task Manager to determine memory usage. I minimize my
application (which causes the task manager to show a more accurate
measurement of memory used) and still the memory usage is enormous.
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Roger Binns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP
if SQLite is suitable for large databases ( > 1 gb,
> > millions of rows in each of several tables). Initially, the memory
> usage
> > was outrageous (~ 500 mb for a 1.3 gb db), but I got that down to < 30
> mb by
> > setting the cache size to 0 and setting a low soft
--- PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if SQLite is suitable for large databases ( > 1 gb,
> millions of rows in each of several tables). Initially, the memory usage
> was outrageous (~ 500 mb for a 1.3 gb db), but I got that down to < 30 mb by
> set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PokerAce wrote:
> Initially, the memory usage
> was outrageous (~ 500 mb for a 1.3 gb db),
How are you measuring memory usage? You have to be very careful as most
operating system tools will report a number greater than the size of all
current
PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if SQLite is suitable for large databases ( > 1 gb,
> millions of rows in each of several tables). Initially, the memory usage
> was outrageous (~ 500 mb for a 1.3 gb db), but I got that down to < 30 mb by
> set
I'm trying to see if SQLite is suitable for large databases ( > 1 gb,
millions of rows in each of several tables). Initially, the memory usage
was outrageous (~ 500 mb for a 1.3 gb db), but I got that down to < 30 mb by
setting the cache size to 0 and setting a low soft heap limit. That
14 matches
Mail list logo