On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Dan Kennedy wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
>
> > The upshot of my tests on Solaris9 was:
> >
> > WARNING: Multi-threaded tests skipped: Linked against a non-
> > threadsafe Tcl build
> > All memory allocations freed - no leaks
> > Memory used:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
> The upshot of my tests on Solaris9 was:
>
> WARNING: Multi-threaded tests skipped: Linked against a non-
> threadsafe Tcl build
> All memory allocations freed - no leaks
> Memory used: now 0 max5727984 max-size
>
The upshot of my tests on Solaris9 was:
WARNING: Multi-threaded tests skipped: Linked against a non-threadsafe Tcl build
All memory allocations freed - no leaks
Memory used: now 0 max5727984 max-size 171798754
Page-cache used: now 0 max 13 max-size
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009 12:25:39 Hugh Sasse wrote:
> > Well, I've found out why the tests aren't included in the amalgamated
> > version. I think it is because it has taken over 5 hours to run the full
> > test suite on the Solaris9 box I have,
Well, I've found out why the tests aren't included in the amalgamated version.
I think it is because it has taken over 5 hours to run the full test suite
on the Solaris9 box I have, and they are not finished yet. I've not noticed
any failures yet though; hopefully I can give a report tomorrow.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Dan Kennedy wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
>
> > Thanks. I think even if they don't change this, and they clearly
> > have reasons for how things are, then clarity about maintenance
> > would be useful.
>
> It works at present. It is tested
On Aug 13, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 13 August 2009 05:04:26 Hugh Sasse wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 August 2009 11:51:40 Hugh Sasse wrote:
> Make check doesn't do anything. My
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009 05:04:26 Hugh Sasse wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 August 2009 11:51:40 Hugh Sasse wrote:
> > > > Make check doesn't do anything. My reading of Makefile{,.in,.am}
> > > > suggests
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 August 2009 11:51:40 Hugh Sasse wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> > > SQLite version 3.6.17 is now available on the SQLite website:
> > [...]
> > > This is the first release of SQLite after 100% branch test
On Aug 10, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Roger Binns wrote:
>
> There is a problem in the amalgamation (.tar.gz but not .zip) where
> SQLITE_API is repeated multiple times making the code invalid if
> defined to
> anything. Example:
>
>> SQLITE_API const char sqlite3_version[] = SQLITE_VERSION;
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> SQLite version 3.6.17 is now available
There is a problem in the amalgamation (.tar.gz but not .zip) where
SQLITE_API is repeated multiple times making the code invalid if defined to
anything. Example:
> SQLITE_API const
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> SQLite version 3.6.17 is now available on the SQLite website:
[...]
> This is the first release of SQLite after 100% branch test coverage of
> the SQLite core was achieved. The effort to bring SQLite up to 100%
Sounds good to me! :-)
SQLite version 3.6.17 is now available on the SQLite website:
http://www.sqlite.org/
http://www.sqlite.org/download.html
This is the first release of SQLite after 100% branch test coverage of
the SQLite core was achieved. The effort to bring SQLite up to 100%
branch test coverage
13 matches
Mail list logo
