[sqlite] Test

test iulianOnofrei ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] Test failures on GPFS

On Sunday, January 12, 2020, Roman Fleysher wrote: > > I use SQLite over GPFS , but in DELETE (which I think is the default) > mode. Not WAL mode. No issues with locking, except performance when > accessing concurrently from multiple nodes. As others pointed out, this has > to do with the

Re: [sqlite] Test failures on GPFS

network access with replication. I have not tried it and do not know what is involved. Roman From: sqlite-users on behalf of Richard Hipp Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 8:59 PM To: SQLite mailing list Subject: Re: [sqlite] Test failures on GPFS CAUTION

Re: [sqlite] Test failures on GPFS

On 1/11/20, J. King wrote: > > WAL mode does not work over the network, so the test failures are presumably > to be expected. > WAL mode should work on a network filesystem, as long as all of the clients are on the same host computer, and as long as mmap()-ing the *-shm file gives all the

Re: [sqlite] Test failures on GPFS

On January 11, 2020 5:57:31 p.m. EST, T J wrote: >I was interested in using sqlite over GPFS. I've seen a few useful >threads >on this: > > [...] > >Overall, it looks pretty good, but there were some WAL >failures. >Could someone comment on the precise implication of those test >failures? WAL

Re: [sqlite] Test failures on GPFS

> On Jan 11, 2020, at 2:58 PM, T J wrote: > > I was interested in using sqlite over GPFS. The standard advice on using SQLite over a network file system is “don’t do it.” Even if you find the rare file system that handles locks properly, you’ll likely have performance issues. A

[sqlite] Test failures on GPFS

Hi, I was interested in using sqlite over GPFS. I've seen a few useful threads on this: - Network file system that support sqlite3 well https://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org/msg117085.html - disable file locking mechanism over the network

[sqlite] Two Sqlite test cases fail - sqlite-src-3280000

Hi, I want to run the Sqlite tests inside a docker in order to run tests easily on any platform. Please let me know if you have bad experiences with Docker. I experience two test cases fail: sqlite-make-test_1 | ! oserror-1.4.1 expected: [1 {unable to open database file}] sqlite-make-test_1

Re: [sqlite] Test error in oserror-2.1.1

Hi, Dan Kennedy writes: > On 02/19/2018 01:28 AM, Free Ekanayaka wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've tried to run the quicktest suite for SQLite 3.22.0 on Linux (kernel >> version 4.13.0), and when it executes test/oserror.test I get errors: >> >> oserror-1.1.1... Ok >>

Re: [sqlite] Test error in oserror-2.1.1

On 02/19/2018 01:28 AM, Free Ekanayaka wrote: Hello, I've tried to run the quicktest suite for SQLite 3.22.0 on Linux (kernel version 4.13.0), and when it executes test/oserror.test I get errors: oserror-1.1.1... Ok oserror-1.1.2... Ok oserror-1.1.3... Ok oserror-1.2.1... Ok oserror-1.2.2...

[sqlite] Test error in oserror-2.1.1

Hello, I've tried to run the quicktest suite for SQLite 3.22.0 on Linux (kernel version 4.13.0), and when it executes test/oserror.test I get errors: oserror-1.1.1... Ok oserror-1.1.2... Ok oserror-1.1.3... Ok oserror-1.2.1... Ok oserror-1.2.2... Ok oserror-1.3.1... Ok oserror-1.3.2... Ok

[sqlite] About test_vfs.c in sqlite test

t of pFile1 may not be 0 when sqlite3OsOpen(pFile1) returns. It makes me confused as I find db will not crash even if all the member elements of the unixFile is not correct. Could it be said that these elements will not be used before they are set to a right value? And what is test_vfs.c for? I am new bee

[sqlite] Test failures ftsconf3.[1-68] on HPPA and Sparc

Greetings, for at least 3.17.0 to 3.20.1 most ftsconf tests fail on Sparc. I've also verified it with 3.20.1 on HPPA, so it is not machine dependend. The output of the tests (all look the same, so only first one here) look suspiciously like an endianess issue (both HPPA and Sparc are big

[sqlite] TEST: please ignore and delete

I'm just checking that the list is again reachable from Nabble after an admin changed the mail address from @sqlite.org to @mailinglists.sqlite.org http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/ Admins: If need be, please delete this message later. -- View this message in context:

[sqlite] Test "vtabH.test" fails when first dir of the path contains underscore

Hi, test "vtabH.test" fails when executed in a path were the first directory contains an underscore (e.g "/p_ath/to" or "/h_ome/test/"): $ pwd /h_ome/test/sqlite-src-3190200 $ ./configure && make && make test ... Time: vtabE.test 11 ms Time: vtabF.test 12 ms ! vtabH-3.6 expected:

Re: [sqlite] how to run the SQLite test suite ?

On 5/10/17, Jason Vas Dias wrote: > > Now I would like run some some 'test suite' that will allow me to > determine if the build is OK - but there appears to be none : > As Simon already pointed out, you have download the pre-compiled "amalgamation" sources. That

Re: [sqlite] how to run the SQLite test suite ?

On 10 May 2017, at 2:26pm, Jason Vas Dias wrote: > I just downloaded & built sqlite-autoconf-318 on Linux x86_64 . > > Now I would like run some some 'test suite' that will allow me to > determine if the build is OK - but there appears to be none : What you have

[sqlite] how to run the SQLite test suite ?

Good day - I just downloaded & built sqlite-autoconf-318 on Linux x86_64 . Now I would like run some some 'test suite' that will allow me to determine if the build is OK - but there appears to be none : $ make check make: Nothing to be done for 'check'. (no test runs are done - this

[sqlite] test

?

[sqlite] test

eyax

[sqlite] Test

This is a test. The sqlite-users at sqlite.org address has been blocked. Only sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org should be allowed through. Mike

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

On 2/14/2015 10:18 AM, Ma?l Nison wrote: > As a side, it's the first time that I received a mail from this mailing > list without it being automatically flagged as spam. Well, technically this is spam... but it's the good kind :) Thank you kindly Mike for the prompt repair and keeping things

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

As a side, it's the first time that I received a mail from this mailing list without it being automatically flagged as spam. Le sam. 14 f?vr. 2015 06:26, Simon Slavin a ?crit : > On 14 Feb 2015, at 4:25am, Mike Owens wrote: > > > So I updated mailman today to use mailinglists.sqlite.org rather

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

GMail has constantly and randomly flagged different messages from this mailing list as spam. I set a specific mail rule to force the mail to NOT be flagged as spam. The nice thing is, GMail also tells me when the message SHOULD have been put into spam but because of my mail rule, the message

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

On 14 Feb 2015, at 4:25am, Mike Owens wrote: > So I updated mailman today to use mailinglists.sqlite.org rather than > sqlite.org:8080 knowing that there is a good chance some issues will arise. > I have been fixing them as they surface. This issue is related to the > Postfix config not

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

I can confirm the bounces happen for the ".mailinglists" email address which is now automatically added to the "Reply-To" address. I hit the reply-to-all button and then remove the .mailinglists address to fix it, but it is rather cumbersome, if the powers that control such things could kindly

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

On 13 Feb 2015, at 11:39pm, David King wrote: > Maybe unrelated, but in the last few hours the list ID header changed from > "sqlite-users.sqlite.org" to "sqlite-users.mailinglists.sqlite.org", which > messes up my mail filtering. Thanks, David. That was it. For others: messages from the

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

This is a test message. I just sent another message to the list and it got bounced with the message "Relay access denied" so I want to see if this one made it. If it does, can the listadmin see if there's anything wrong ? Sorry to occupy your Friday night or weekend. Simon.

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

We are in the process of moving mailman from sqlite.org:8080 to mailinglists.sqlite.org. The reason for this is that sqlite.org runs on a different web server (althttpd) than the mailman management (Apache) and so we originally used port 8080 for mailman. Well, port 8080 does not work for some

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

Also FYI: I sent this last one to both sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org and sqlite-users at sqlite.org, and the one to sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org bounced with the same "Relay Access Denied" but the other one went through. On 13 Feb 2015, at 15:39, David King wrote: >

[sqlite] test for bounce detection

Maybe unrelated, but in the last few hours the list ID header changed from "sqlite-users.sqlite.org" to "sqlite-users.mailinglists.sqlite.org", which messes up my mail filtering. Of course I'll fix it locally, I only mention in because it might be related to whatever server config changes have

Re: [sqlite] How to get access to SQLite Test Harness #3(TH3)

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Kishore Reddy wrote: > > *Richard Hipp,* > I am planning to use SQLite library in *Avionics Level B software*. > SQLite is developed using a DO-178B compatible process. The 100% MC/DC testing is just one aspect of that. Contact our office for

Re: [sqlite] How to get access to SQLite Test Harness #3(TH3)

Hi *Roger Binns*, Thanks for the reply.Actually i wasnt checking mail-list for answer i thought i will be getting mail to my gmail that is the reason i posted on developers forum too. *Richard Hipp*, i dont see any reply from you in the mail-list. *Roger Binns/* *Richard Hipp,* I am planning

Re: [sqlite] How to get access to SQLite Test Harness #3(TH3)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23/06/14 23:09, Kishore Reddy wrote: > a)I want to use sqlite library in my project software.In the website it > is listed as TH3 achieves 100% branch test coverage. The SQLite software as released has already been tested with TH3 and passed. You

[sqlite] How to get access to SQLite Test Harness #3(TH3)

Hi, a)I want to use sqlite library in my project software.In the website it is listed as TH3 achieves 100% branch test coverage.I want all the test results of the SQLite software which shows that the software has *100% statement+branch coverage*.Can any one tell me how to get these test results ??

Re: [sqlite] Test for pending writes ?

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Adrian Soundy < adrian.sou...@integration.co.nz> wrote: > > > Is there a Sqlite method that will tell me if there is any pending writes > from another process so I can end and commit the current transaction > straight away ? > No. Doing that would require some

[sqlite] Test for pending writes ?

Hello, I have a process on an embedded device that is continuously updating the database in WAL mode. To get the performance we require in the busy cases we put everything in to transactions. Sometimes another process needs to write to the same database in a timely manner. Is there

[sqlite] test

please ignore ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] test ignore

test ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Test failures on Ubuntu

Hi, Really appretiate if some one can point out how can i debug the failures Thanks -- View this message in context: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/Test-failures-on-Ubuntu-tp65874p65933.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[sqlite] Test failures on Ubuntu

Hi, I am getting failures in the below tests while doing the regression test on Ubuntu with , SHA1 Hash: ba8d08b67021a32fda069c18b7eb93523e6f0d1f Date: 2012-11-27 21:56:28 Most of the failures are, Expected: [1 1] Got: [0 {}] Are these errors serious, How to fix these ? Thank You

Re: [sqlite] Running SQLite Test Suites

> The "test" target is in the file "main.mk" which is "include"-ed by the very > last line of Makefile.linux-gcc. Thanks Richard. That clears up things. -- Grace Batumbya Research Assistant | Seneca CDOT Phone: 416-491-5050 x3548 cdot.senecac.on.ca

Re: [sqlite] Running SQLite Test Suites

The "test" target is in the file "main.mk" which is "include"-ed by the very last line of Makefile.linux-gcc. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Grace Batumbya < grace.batum...@senecacollege.ca> wrote: > >./configure; make test > > > > > >I just ran it on Solaris, as shown above, and it appears to

Re: [sqlite] Running SQLite Test Suites

>./configure; make test > >I just ran it on Solaris, as shown above, and it appears to be working fine. >You will need a relatively recent version of TCL, however. 8.5 or 8.6. >From the REAME file: ... If the configure script does not work out for you, there is a generic makefile named

Re: [sqlite] Running SQLite Test Suites

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Carl Desautels < carlin.desaut...@senecacollege.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > A partner and I have downloaded the SQLite core source and made some > alterations, and we can successfully build the source. > However we would like to know how to run the TCL test suite,

[sqlite] Running SQLite Test Suites

Hi, A partner and I have downloaded the SQLite core source and made some alterations, and we can successfully build the source. However we would like to know how to run the TCL test suite, resources online suggest simply running $make test/alltest.I feel like this resource is out of date because

[sqlite] Test message, please ignore...

Test. -- Joe Mistachkin ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Test Foreign Key Column

o create each > table. Foreign fields will have a REFERENCES key word. > > Regards, > > ¬Jonathan > > -Original Message- > From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org > [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of M.Ozeau > Sent: 26 April 2011 17:06 >

Re: [sqlite] Test Foreign Key Column

-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of M.Ozeau Sent: 26 April 2011 17:06 To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: [sqlite] Test Foreign Key Column Hi and sorry for my poor English. I want to know if is it possible to test if a column is a foreign key. I mean, where the "constraint" is stored

[sqlite] Test Foreign Key Column

Hi and sorry for my poor English. I want to know if is it possible to test if a column is a foreign key. I mean, where the "constraint" is stored ? The only system table i know for Sqlite is the "sqlite_master" but can't find anything in her for the foreign key. For example, if i have a table

Re: [sqlite] test/exists.test 2.$tn.1 fails if both DBs are in WAL mode

>> For me, this test from test/exists.test fails if both database >> connections are opened in WAL mode, that is if "PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL" >> is issued right after each DB is opened. >> >># TABLE objects. >># >>do_test { >> sql1 { DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1 } >>

[sqlite] test/exists.test 2.$tn.1 fails if both DBs are in WAL mode

For me, this test from test/exists.test fails if both database connections are opened in WAL mode, that is if "PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL" is issued right after each DB is opened. # TABLE objects. # do_test{ sql1 { DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1 } sql2 { CREATE TABLE t1(x) } sql1

Re: [sqlite] test/exists.test 2.$tn.1 fails if both DBs are in WAL mode

The test passes well if I recreate the database file anew just prior to running it so it acts upon an empty database. If this is what is intended, I apologize for the false alarm. Ralf On 10.04.2011 10:28, Ralf Junker wrote: > For me, this test from test/exists.test fails if both database >

[sqlite] test/exists.test 2.$tn.1 fails if both DBs are in WAL mode

For me, this test from test/exists.test fails if both database connections are opened in WAL mode, that is if "PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL" is issued right after each DB is opened. # TABLE objects. # do_test{ sql1 { DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1 } sql2 { CREATE TABLE t1(x) } sql1

[sqlite] test DBD::SQLite 1.30_04 - write-ahead logging

unlinking of the database, such as if it was temporary for testing. The DBD::SQLite test suite had needed an update to act more correctly, which the update to 3.7.x from 3.6.x exposed; 3.6.x didn't complain about this. If you want in to DBD::SQLite development, then join the following email/IRC forums

Re: [sqlite] how to get the sqlite test case?

The official test-suite is proprietary. If you really wish to get your hands on it, you may enter in a contract with Hwaci as seen described at http://sqlite.org/consortium.html On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 08:55 +0800, xuecaili wrote: > Hello! > I'm a sqlite user and I want to use sqlite to

Re: [sqlite] how to get the sqlite test case?

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:55:31AM +0800, xuecaili scratched on the wall: > Hello! > I'm a sqlite user and I want to use sqlite to develop a > software. But at first, I'd like to test sqlite. It is declared in the > official web site that how sqlite is tested. I want to get the test

[sqlite] how to get the sqlite test case?

Hello! I'm a sqlite user and I want to use sqlite to develop a software. But at first, I'd like to test sqlite. It is declared in the official web site that how sqlite is tested. I want to get the test case you test the sqlite, especially 7.2 million queries run with the SQL TEST

[sqlite] test harness?

I am encountering significant differences in the way the data libraries for SQLite produced by a "major player" are handling joins, unions, and inline views, in combination, compared to several other GUI front ends for SQLite which have been well-received and which jibe with each other. Is

[sqlite] test DBD::SQLite 1.26_06 please

All, I am pleased to announce that DBD::SQLite (Self Contained RDBMS in a Perl DBI Driver) version 1.26_06 has been released on CPAN (by Adam Kennedy). http://search.cpan.org/~adamk/DBD-SQLite-1.26_06/ TESTING NEEDED! Please bash the hell out of the latest DBD::SQLite and report any

Re: [sqlite] test DBD::SQLite 1.26_05 - foreign keys!

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:49 PM, P Kishor wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Darren Duncan > wrote: >> P Kishor wrote [on sqlite-us...@sqlite.org]: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Darren Duncan >>> wrote:

Re: [sqlite] test DBD::SQLite 1.26_05 - foreign keys!

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Darren Duncan wrote: > P Kishor wrote [on sqlite-us...@sqlite.org]: >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Darren Duncan >> wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I am pleased to announce that DBD::SQLite (Self Contained

Re: [sqlite] test DBD::SQLite 1.26_05 - foreign keys!

P Kishor wrote [on sqlite-us...@sqlite.org]: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Darren Duncan > wrote: >> All, >> >> I am pleased to announce that DBD::SQLite (Self Contained RDBMS in a Perl DBI >> Driver) version 1.26_05 has been released on CPAN (by Adam Kennedy). >> >

Re: [sqlite] test DBD::SQLite 1.26_05 - foreign keys!

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Darren Duncan wrote: > All, > > I am pleased to announce that DBD::SQLite (Self Contained RDBMS in a Perl DBI > Driver) version 1.26_05 has been released on CPAN (by Adam Kennedy). > .. > > P.S.  DBD::SQLite has at least 1 known bug, also

Re: [sqlite] [DBD-SQLite] test DBD::SQLite 1.26_05 - foreign keys!

Please note the following correction to the announcement. Whining is also welcome. :) Adam K 2009/10/15 Darren Duncan : > Patches welcome.  Ideas welcome.  Testing welcome.  Whining to /dev/null. ___ sqlite-users mailing list

[sqlite] test DBD::SQLite 1.26_05 - foreign keys!

All, I am pleased to announce that DBD::SQLite (Self Contained RDBMS in a Perl DBI Driver) version 1.26_05 has been released on CPAN (by Adam Kennedy). http://search.cpan.org/~adamk/DBD-SQLite-1.26_05/ This developer release bundles the brand-new SQLite version 3.6.19, which adds support

Re: [sqlite] Platforms on which SQLite test cases are run

On May 8, 2009, at 2:47 PM, mwnn wrote: > Hi, > The page at http://www.sqlite.org/testing.html quotes > "Prior to each check-in to the SQLite source tree, developers > typically run > a subset (called "veryquick") of the Tcl tests consisting of about > 41.7 > thousand test cases and

[sqlite] Platforms on which SQLite test cases are run

Hi, The page at http://www.sqlite.org/testing.html quotes "Prior to each check-in to the SQLite source tree, developers typically run a subset (called "veryquick") of the Tcl tests consisting of about 41.7 thousand test cases and covering 97.07% of the core SQLite source code." Are the test

Re: [sqlite] test error

hi, attachments do not reach this list, please specify the error. Martin AVINASH MITTAL schrieb: > > Hi, > > while executing tests for amalgamation for version 3.6.5 i got this error, > can somebody help me in this regard > > Regards > ___ >

[sqlite] test error

Hi, while executing tests for amalgamation for version 3.6.5 i got this error, can somebody help me in this regard Regards ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] SQLite test suite - where is it?

On Sep 8, 2008, at 11:05 PM, Ribeiro, Glauber wrote: > Sorry for the newbie question, but how is the regression testing > invoked? > > I tried "make check" with the 3.6.2 "amalgamation" distribution in > Unix, > but that seemed to do nothing. You only get the test suite if you download the

[sqlite] SQLite test suite - where is it?

Sorry for the newbie question, but how is the regression testing invoked? I tried "make check" with the 3.6.2 "amalgamation" distribution in Unix, but that seemed to do nothing. Thanks, glauber ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org

[sqlite] test suite failures on 3.6.2 on x86_64

When building sqlite 3.6.2 on Mandriva Linux Cooker x86_64, some tests fail: 12 errors out of 23377 tests Failures on these tests: lookaside-1.4 lookaside-1.5 memsubsys1-2.3 memsubsys1-2.4 memsubsys1-3.2.4 memsubsys1-4.3 memsubsys1-4.4 memsubsys1-5.3 memsubsys1-6.3 memsubsys1-6.4

Re: [sqlite] SQLite Test Scripts

u need to start the testfixture and pass it one of the test scripts. ./testfixture ../sqlite/test/xyz.test Where xyz is the name of the test script you want to run. HTH Dennis Cote ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/c

[sqlite] SQLite Test Scripts

How can I run the SQLite TCL test scripts? Thanks, -Alex ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] Test insert4-2.4.1 in insert4.test

I don't have TCL, so I'm trying to validate sqlite by running some of the tests by hand. In insert4.test, there is a sub-test do_test insert4-2.4.1 { execsql { DELETE FROM t3; INSERT INTO t3 SELECT DISTINCT * FROM t2; SELECT * FROM t3; } } {9 1 1 9} I can run this test by

[sqlite] test post via gmane

Hopefully now that sqlite-users is on mailman it will take posts sent via gmane. If this message shows up, then that is the case. - a ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org

Re: [sqlite] Test suite

Grab the source tree via tar.gz file or cvs and run: ./configure make test or make fulltest To run just a single test file: make testfixture# if not already built by make test ./testfixture test/select1.test --- Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry if this has been asked, but

[sqlite] Test suite

Sorry if this has been asked, but I'd like to know how to run the test suite. I could not find any documentation on this on the sqlite website. Thanks for your help. Ken

Re: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin

; Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 6:05 PM > > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > > Subject: Re: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin > > > > > Of course, the easiest option by far is to use a Linux b

RE: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin

TECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 6:05 PM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin > > > Of course, the easiest option by far is to use a Linux box or > a Mac. :-) > > -- &g

Re: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin

Evans, Mark (Tandem) wrote: So it looks like I have a cygwin TCL issue. Is this fixable? You can load Active State Tcl and use that instead of the version that comes with Cygwin. You get lots of extra goodies, in addition to an up-to-date Tcl core. HTH, Gerry

Re: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin

"Evans, Mark (Tandem)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** > N.B.: The version of TCL that you used to build this test harness > is defective in that it does not support 64-bit integers. Some or > all of the test failures above might be

Re: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin

"Evans, Mark (Tandem)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been lurking on the message board and am in awe of the collective > wisdom. > > I'm just getting my feet wet learning the internals of SQLite, drinking > from the proverbial firehose. I am using cygwin 1.90 as my learning >

RE: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin

memory usage: 76060 bytes So it looks like I have a cygwin TCL issue. Is this fixable? Mark > -Original Message- > From: Evans, Mark (Tandem) > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 5:47 PM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: [sqlite] test failures on cygwin > >

[sqlite] test failures on cygwin

Hi all, I have been lurking on the message board and am in awe of the collective wisdom. I'm just getting my feet wet learning the internals of SQLite, drinking from the proverbial firehose. I am using cygwin 1.90 as my learning platform and I have built SQLite 3.5.0. I ran 'make test'

Re: [sqlite] test fixture tcl errors on Windows

a better patch... Index: test/exclusive2.test === RCS file: /sqlite/sqlite/test/exclusive2.test,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -3 -p -r1.4 exclusive2.test --- test/exclusive2.test16 Apr 2007 15:02:20 - 1.4

Re: [sqlite] test fixture tcl errors on Windows

. It ought to work on MinGW as well. Index: test/exclusive2.test === RCS file: /sqlite/sqlite/test/exclusive2.test,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -3 -p -r1.4 exclusive2.test --- test/exclusive2.test16 Apr 2007 15:02:20 -

Re: [sqlite] test fixture tcl errors on Windows

Dennis Cote wrote: I don't know enough TCL to know if there is a subtle bug here or not. I suspect that perhaps the file isn't really being closed until the script exits.Does this seem possible? Dennis Cote Get "filemon" from www.sysinternals.com. Set a filter to monitor all files in

Re: [sqlite] test fixture tcl errors on Windows

of the database file used for the 3.x tests from test.db to test3.db. I also added a pair of file delete commands in catch blocks to remove the test3.db file. Now when I run this test set I get no failures. $ ./testfixture.exe ../sqlite/test/exclusive2.test exclusive2-1.0... Ok exclusive2-1.1

Re: [sqlite] test fixture tcl errors on Windows

xecuting > "file delete -force test.db" > (file "../sqlite/test/exclusive2.test" line 192) > > > Do any of you TCL experts have any idea what could be wrong? > My guess is that your virus scanning software is opening the test.db file as sson as

[sqlite] test fixture tcl errors on Windows

../sqlite/test/exclusive2.test exclusive2-1.0... Ok exclusive2-1.1... Ok exclusive2-1.2... Ok exclusive2-1.3... Ok exclusive2-1.4... Ok exclusive2-1.5... Ok exclusive2-1.6... Ok exclusive2-1.7... Ok exclusive2-1.9... Ok exclusive2-1.10... Ok exclusive2-1.11... Ok

[sqlite] test message ...

Please ignore this test -- sorry. - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

[sqlite] test mail - plz ignore

Re: [sqlite] test program won't run anymore! sqliteBtreeOpen: Assertion 'seizeof...

I'd try the following: 1. make completely sure you're linking against the correct SQLite library. Are you linking dynamically or statically? 2. turn all optimizations off (CFLAGS="" before running ./configure), compile, link and test your app. 3. grab the pre-configured SQLite sources

Re: [sqlite] test program won't run anymore! sqliteBtreeOpen: Assertion 'seizeof...

I'm pretty sure my gcc is not broken (although I'm not sure how to check specifically for this problem). I can compile stuff with gcc without a problem as long as the sqlite stuff is not on there. -Keiichi On 7/24/06, Jay Sprenkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/24/06, Keiichi McGuire <[EMAIL

Re: [sqlite] test program won't run anymore! sqliteBtreeOpen: Assertion 'seizeof...

On 7/24/06, Keiichi McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Previously when I went into sqlite via command line I could not create a table, and I would get that same error message. So what I did was that I reinstalled sqlite, to a different directory so I can keep my other version to see if I can

Re: [sqlite] test program won't run anymore! sqliteBtreeOpen: Assertion 'seizeof...

Previously when I went into sqlite via command line I could not create a table, and I would get that same error message. So what I did was that I reinstalled sqlite, to a different directory so I can keep my other version to see if I can find any differences. The good thing is that the

Re: [sqlite] test program won't run anymore! sqliteBtreeOpen: Assertion 'seizeof...

nope, i was actually using the right sqlite, since the other one actually gave me an architecture error. any ideas? On 7/24/06, Keiichi McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: nope, compiler is still the same (gcc). actually... i think i might have the answer. Might have jumped the gun on the

Re: [sqlite] test program won't run anymore! sqliteBtreeOpen: Assertion 'seizeof...

nope, compiler is still the same (gcc). actually... i think i might have the answer. Might have jumped the gun on the question. I did install a version of sqlite that is for arm-linux, and that would be why it's not compiling. let me double check and I will post again :), sorry if it was a

  1   2   >