Re: [sqlite] TCL Binding with VC6
yazan wasfi wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to compile sqlite with TCL enabled under VC6, Ive installed ActiveTCL8.4, and Added the include, lib, bin, to my VC6 project, when compiling the sqlite, I dont get any errors, but when trying to link it I get 49 errors like this Linking... tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_PkgProvide tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_Free tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_DStringFree tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_SetResult tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_Alloc tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_WrongNumArgs I've included the c:/tcl/lib to my projects settings, but I'm not sure if there should be any other folders/files that should be added, It looks as if you have left out a library in the link statement. The relevant library is tcl84.lib or if you compile with stubs, tclstub84.lib in c:/tcl/lib. Regards, Arjen - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[sqlite] TCL Binding with VC6
Hi All, I'm trying to compile sqlite with TCL enabled under VC6, Ive installed ActiveTCL8.4, and Added the include, lib, bin, to my VC6 project, when compiling the sqlite, I dont get any errors, but when trying to link it I get 49 errors like this Linking... tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_PkgProvide tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_Free tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_DStringFree tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_SetResult tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_Alloc tclsqlite.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__Tcl_WrongNumArgs I've included the c:/tcl/lib to my projects settings, but I'm not sure if there should be any other folders/files that should be added, Best regards, Yazan Wasfi __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [sqlite] Make test under windows
Thanks very Much, A.J. Millan, That works, - Original Message From: A.J.Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 10:37:40 AM Subject: Re: [sqlite] Make test under windows Surely You must link those two files explicitly in yours project. A.J.Millan > Hi All, > > I'm trying to compile sqlite3.3.16 under windows using MinGW, and MSYS, when typing make, it compiles correctly, but make test, give me 2 errors > gcc.exe user32.lib [no such file or directory] > gcc.exe advapi32.lib [no such file or directory] > > I've checked the 2 files and they are on the my path, anyone has any idea, > - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [sqlite] Re: Need Help with SQL Statement
This should do it: select * from Options o1 where rowid in ( select o2.rowid from Options o2 where o1.StockSymbol = o2.StockSymbol and o1.ExpiryDate=o2.ExpiryDate and o2.StrikePrice < o2.StockPrice limit 4); Thanks Igor, this doesn't work (no results are displayed) which may well be that I haven't implemented your solution correctly but it has certainly given me some idea about where to look and how to use LIMIT 4 in a way that generates more than just a total of 4 rows. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out to be faster to just retrieve all records and skip over all but the first four in each group in your program. I will explore this suggestion as well as your first suggestion seems to take an inordinately long time (even to display no records :) ) Thanks, Roger - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re[2]: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
Hello drh, I'm happy with the new source release method. I was fine with the old way too. The new method is slightly more convenient for me when I upgrade. C Monday, April 30, 2007, 5:46:19 PM, you wrote: dhc> Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> As fas as I know, the dev team is Dr Hipp and Dan Kennedy (apologies if >> there's someone else and I missed you) and I agree, it is slightly odd >> for neither of them to reply. >> dhc> Why is it odd? The issue is not something that needs replying dhc> to. This is not a bug. There has been a request for a different dhc> kind of partially-compiled code distribution for the convenience dhc> of some users. We have observed the request. What more needs to dhc> be said? dhc> -- dhc> D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dhc> - dhc> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] dhc> - -- Best regards, Tegmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree, it is slightly odd for neither of them to reply. Why is it odd? Because you normally reply to these things, if only to say something lie "the pre-processed source for Windows is provided as a courtesy". ;) We have observed the request. What more needs to be said? Well, it appears the OP wanted something more to be said. I was just pointing out that you might be off-site. Martin - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
RES: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
-Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 30 de abril de 2007 18:46 Para: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Assunto: Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As fas as I know, the dev team is Dr Hipp and Dan Kennedy (apologies if > there's someone else and I missed you) and I agree, it is slightly odd > for neither of them to reply. > Why is it odd? The issue is not something that needs replying to. This is not a bug. There has been a request for a different kind of partially-compiled code distribution for the convenience of some users. We have observed the request. What more needs to be said? -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/1/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/1/2003 - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
RES: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
-Mensagem original- De: Bennett, Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 30 de abril de 2007 19:28 Para: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Assunto: RE: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? People (myself being one of them) were asking if it could be put back the way it was. Several of us (those that replied at least) stated our dislike of the new single .c file format. It was also a question (hence the subject line). No one ever replied. It seemed like something worthy of at least a reply. - Patrick Bennett -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:46 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As fas as I know, the dev team is Dr Hipp and Dan Kennedy (apologies if > there's someone else and I missed you) and I agree, it is slightly odd > for neither of them to reply. > Why is it odd? The issue is not something that needs replying to. This is not a bug. There has been a request for a different kind of partially-compiled code distribution for the convenience of some users. We have observed the request. What more needs to be said? -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/1/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/1/2003 - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[sqlite] Re: Need Help with SQL Statement
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a file with the columns: StockSymbol, OptionSymbol, StockPrice, StrikePrice, ExpiryDate For each StockSymbol, ExpiryDate, I would like to list just 4 of the records where the StrikePrice is lower than the StockPrice. This should do it: select * from Options o1 where rowid in ( select o2.rowid from Options o2 where o1.StockSymbol = o2.StockSymbol and o1.ExpiryDate=o2.ExpiryDate and o2.StrikePrice < o2.StockPrice limit 4); I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out to be faster to just retrieve all records and skip over all but the first four in each group in your program. Igor Tandetnik - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
RE: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
People (myself being one of them) were asking if it could be put back the way it was. Several of us (those that replied at least) stated our dislike of the new single .c file format. It was also a question (hence the subject line). No one ever replied. It seemed like something worthy of at least a reply. - Patrick Bennett -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:46 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As fas as I know, the dev team is Dr Hipp and Dan Kennedy (apologies if > there's someone else and I missed you) and I agree, it is slightly odd > for neither of them to reply. > Why is it odd? The issue is not something that needs replying to. This is not a bug. There has been a request for a different kind of partially-compiled code distribution for the convenience of some users. We have observed the request. What more needs to be said? -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
RE: [sqlite] Need Help with SQL Statement
Use LIMIT 4 Thanks - Jon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 6:10 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: [sqlite] Need Help with SQL Statement I have a file with the columns: StockSymbol, OptionSymbol, StockPrice, StrikePrice, ExpiryDate For each StockSymbol, ExpiryDate, I would like to list just 4 of the records where the StrikePrice is lower than the StockPrice. The following is close to what I want except it gives me all the rows where the StrikePrice is less than StockPrice but I only want 4 rows (2 PUTs & 2 CALLs) for each Stock and associated ExpiryDate. SELECT StockSymbol, OptionSymbol, ExpiryDate, StrikePrice, StockPrice FROM Options WHERE nStrikePrice < StockPrice ORDER BY StockSymbol,sExpiryDate, nStrikePrice DESC; I would appreciate any suggestions on how I can generate an appropriate SQL statement. Thanks, Roger - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: [sqlite] Need Help with SQL Statement
see the LIMIT option On 4/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a file with the columns: StockSymbol, OptionSymbol, StockPrice, StrikePrice, ExpiryDate For each StockSymbol, ExpiryDate, I would like to list just 4 of the records where the StrikePrice is lower than the StockPrice. The following is close to what I want except it gives me all the rows where the StrikePrice is less than StockPrice but I only want 4 rows (2 PUTs & 2 CALLs) for each Stock and associated ExpiryDate. SELECT StockSymbol, OptionSymbol, ExpiryDate, StrikePrice, StockPrice FROM Options WHERE nStrikePrice < StockPrice ORDER BY StockSymbol,sExpiryDate, nStrikePrice DESC; I would appreciate any suggestions on how I can generate an appropriate SQL statement. Thanks, Roger - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Puneet Kishor http://punkish.eidesis.org/ Nelson Inst. for Env. Studies, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/ Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org/education/ - collaborate, communicate, compete = - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[sqlite] Need Help with SQL Statement
I have a file with the columns: StockSymbol, OptionSymbol, StockPrice, StrikePrice, ExpiryDate For each StockSymbol, ExpiryDate, I would like to list just 4 of the records where the StrikePrice is lower than the StockPrice. The following is close to what I want except it gives me all the rows where the StrikePrice is less than StockPrice but I only want 4 rows (2 PUTs & 2 CALLs) for each Stock and associated ExpiryDate. SELECT StockSymbol, OptionSymbol, ExpiryDate, StrikePrice, StockPrice FROM Options WHERE nStrikePrice < StockPrice ORDER BY StockSymbol,sExpiryDate, nStrikePrice DESC; I would appreciate any suggestions on how I can generate an appropriate SQL statement. Thanks, Roger - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As fas as I know, the dev team is Dr Hipp and Dan Kennedy (apologies if > there's someone else and I missed you) and I agree, it is slightly odd > for neither of them to reply. > Why is it odd? The issue is not something that needs replying to. This is not a bug. There has been a request for a different kind of partially-compiled code distribution for the convenience of some users. We have observed the request. What more needs to be said? -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
RES: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
-Mensagem original- De: Martin Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 30 de abril de 2007 18:25 Para: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Assunto: Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? Bennett, Patrick wrote: > I wasn't sure who maintained the binary distribution and based on the > recent list activity, I assumed someone who was responsible would've > already replied. As fas as I know, the dev team is Dr Hipp and Dan Kennedy (apologies if there's someone else and I missed you) and I agree, it is slightly odd for neither of them to reply. In the interim, could you find an old PC, install Linux on it and build the preprocessed sources locally? Another option might be to install something like Cygwin on one of your Windows boxes. Martin - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/1/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/1/2003 - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
Bennett, Patrick wrote: I wasn't sure who maintained the binary distribution and based on the recent list activity, I assumed someone who was responsible would've already replied. As fas as I know, the dev team is Dr Hipp and Dan Kennedy (apologies if there's someone else and I missed you) and I agree, it is slightly odd for neither of them to reply. In the interim, could you find an old PC, install Linux on it and build the preprocessed sources locally? Another option might be to install something like Cygwin on one of your Windows boxes. Martin - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
RE: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
Ok, thanks for pointing that out. I wasn't sure who maintained the binary distribution and based on the recent list activity, I assumed someone who was responsible would've already replied. Patrick -Original Message- From: Martin Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:09 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? Bennett, Patrick wrote: > No comment at all? That's three users asking for this now. :( Dr Hipp usually responds pretty quickly, but sometimes he's away on business. You know, supporting the paying customers... ;) Martin - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
Bennett, Patrick wrote: No comment at all? That's three users asking for this now. :( Dr Hipp usually responds pretty quickly, but sometimes he's away on business. You know, supporting the paying customers... ;) Martin - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
RE: [sqlite] sqlite and borland c++ builder
Thanks for the response, people have generously sent me file that work and I'm up and running! Thanks - Jon -Original Message- From: Dennis Cote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 10:31 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite and borland c++ builder Jonathan Kahn wrote: > > > When I try to use the header I get errors > > [C++ Error] sqlite3.h(1778): E2232 Constant member > 'sqlite3_index_info::nConstraint' in class without constructors > > > > Jonathan, This is indeed a bug in the Borland/CodeGear compiler. It has been discussed on their mailing lists several times and is currently in their bug tracking system http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=32959. I just posted a message when I ran into the same problem trying to use a current version of sqlite see http://groups.google.ca/group/borland.public.cppbuilder.language.cpp/browse_ frm/thread/f04139e048a2f55/98b6a1c5616057b4?lnk=st&q=sqlite+E2232+&rnum=1#98 b6a1c5616057b4 I forgot that I had ran into this problem earlier. It hasn't been a huge issue for me since most of my sqlite use is done with an older version of sqlite (3.2.7) that doesn't trigger this problem. You can work around the problem by creating a modified sqlite3.h header that eliminates the const qualifiers from the offending declarations. You could also comment out the entire structure definition and change the type of the second argument to xBestIndex to a void pointer if you are not going to use the virtual table interfaces. or you could use an older version from before June of 2006 when these items were added to the header file. I have had no problems building either a dll or a static library using the Borland compiler in C mode. The problems occur when you try to include the standard sqlite3.h header into a C++ source file. It might help to post to the newsgroups saying you are also having problems, or to vote on the bug in the QC system. HTH Dennis Cote - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: [sqlite] Make test under windows
Surely You must link those two files explicitly in yours project. A.J.Millan > Hi All, > > I'm trying to compile sqlite3.3.16 under windows using MinGW, and MSYS, when typing make, it compiles correctly, but make test, give me 2 errors > gcc.exe user32.lib [no such file or directory] > gcc.exe advapi32.lib [no such file or directory] > > I've checked the 2 files and they are on the my path, anyone has any idea, > - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[sqlite] Make test under windows
Hi All, I'm trying to compile sqlite3.3.16 under windows using MinGW, and MSYS, when typing make, it compiles correctly, but make test, give me 2 errors gcc.exe user32.lib [no such file or directory] gcc.exe advapi32.lib [no such file or directory] I've checked the 2 files and they are on the my path, anyone has any idea, Thankx __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14?
No comment at all? That's three users asking for this now. :( Patrick -Original Message- From: Clark Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:12 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? In general, I agree. I miss the zipped set of pre-processed C source. Since you have the Linux-based build system at your disposal, you can get what you're used to having with make target_source on the Linux system. This creates a tsrc directory containing the familiar pre-processed C source for use in your Windows build. For what it's worth, I was able to build the sqlite3.dll on Windows (VC6) from the "amalgam" sqlite3.c file without having to have lemon or any of the other SQLite-specific build components - except that pesky sqlite3.def file. I still have to download the precompiled Win32 DLL to get that. Looking at the generated makefile (from the configure script) on Linux, I see there's a rule for making sqlite3.def. The algorithm (grep ... | sed ...) basically works on Windows, using the sqlite3.obj, but the resulting def is short a few lines compared to the one I downloaded. Last, I tried to build the shell from the compiled amalgam, but it errors-out on the link phase complaining about unresolved externals (sqlite3_iotrace or somesuch). And I don't have time right now to figure it out. I'm not a C programmer, and am unfamiliar with compilers, linkers, compiler options, and all that. I usually just have to do trial and error (lots of error) and eventually I figure it out. -Clark - Original Message From: "Bennett, Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:57:38 AM Subject: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? The last time I downloaded SQLite was version 3.3.12. For that version (and many prior versions), I could download a preprocessed archive containing all of the source code, except parse.h, parse.c and opcode.h(? - this is from memory) were the 'generated' versions. The source for the command-line shell was there as well as all other source code. This was close to ideal for me, as I was able to use it in our (custom) build system and build for Windows and Linux with almost no effort at all. Now, I have two choices: 1) Download a tar of everything and have a version of lemon available (which nothing else here uses), as well awk and other tools which don't fit well within our windows-side compiles, or.. 2) Download a preprocessed archive that contains only two files (sqlite3.c and sqlite3.h) losing the ability to easily track changes (or make local patches / fixes if necessary) as well as no longer having the shell code. I'll have to download both archives and piece together my own build. Hopefully this doesn't come off as too much of a nag, but the way it was before was quite convenient and the new method seems to have taken the 'preprocessed' notion to the extreme. If this is how it's going to be from now on, I'll just have to adjust, but if there wasn't any specific reason for changing, you can count this as a vote for the 'old' way. :) Cheers... Patrick Bennett - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: [sqlite] sqlite and borland c++ builder
Jonathan Kahn wrote: When I try to use the header I get errors [C++ Error] sqlite3.h(1778): E2232 Constant member 'sqlite3_index_info::nConstraint' in class without constructors Jonathan, This is indeed a bug in the Borland/CodeGear compiler. It has been discussed on their mailing lists several times and is currently in their bug tracking system http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=32959. I just posted a message when I ran into the same problem trying to use a current version of sqlite see http://groups.google.ca/group/borland.public.cppbuilder.language.cpp/browse_frm/thread/f04139e048a2f55/98b6a1c5616057b4?lnk=st&q=sqlite+E2232+&rnum=1#98b6a1c5616057b4 I forgot that I had ran into this problem earlier. It hasn't been a huge issue for me since most of my sqlite use is done with an older version of sqlite (3.2.7) that doesn't trigger this problem. You can work around the problem by creating a modified sqlite3.h header that eliminates the const qualifiers from the offending declarations. You could also comment out the entire structure definition and change the type of the second argument to xBestIndex to a void pointer if you are not going to use the virtual table interfaces. or you could use an older version from before June of 2006 when these items were added to the header file. I have had no problems building either a dll or a static library using the Borland compiler in C mode. The problems occur when you try to include the standard sqlite3.h header into a C++ source file. It might help to post to the newsgroups saying you are also having problems, or to vote on the bug in the QC system. HTH Dennis Cote - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
