SQLite versions.
Thanks to everyone in the group who tried to help. Regards, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Joe Mistachkin <sql...@mistachkin.com>
To: 'General Discussion of SQLite Database' <sqlite-users@s
Joe Winograd wrote:
>
> I don't have access to the machine with HP Connection Manager on it, but I
> just ran Dependency Walker on the TurboTax 2010 executable on a W7/64-bit
> machine, which is the same OS as on the other box, and DW showed no
entries
> in the module list with in the name
sense? Thanks, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Black, Michael (IS) <michael.bla...@ngc.com>
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Date: Wed Jan 25 2012 07:25:52 GMT-0600 (Cent
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: epank...@comcast.net
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Date: Tue Jan 24 2012 15:24:00 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)
1. Could we please stay on
web experience,
such as Experts Exchange, but those are professional, custom-brew sites that
were likely very expensive to build. Regards, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Normand Mongeau <nmong...@theobjects.
with the delete key.
Regards, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Tim Streater <t...@clothears.org.uk>
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Date: Tue Jan 24 2012 15:09:00 GMT-0600 (Cent
Michael,
That is one very cool utility! As soon as I can get access to the machine,
I'll give it a spin. Thanks for the tip. Regards, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Black, Michael (IS) <michael.bla...@ngc.
] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
> you can go ahead and reinstall HP's Connection Manager
Kevin,
Thanks for the idea, but it will not install. The way this group operates
with excessive trimming/snipping, that has long since been removed from this
thread (this M.O. makes it v
1. Could we please stay on topic
2. Could we please not go down this road again?
If you guys really want to argue about proper posting etiquette and / or using
something besides an email list, they've both been done to death. Just search
the archives or start a new thread that's appropriately
On 2012-01-24 16:09, Tim Streater wrote:
On 24 Jan 2012 at 20:02, Joe Winograd wrote:
Thanks for the idea, but it will not install. The way this group operates
with excessive trimming/snipping ...
No it doesn't. It doesn't do *enough* trimming and snipping, and as a
On 24 Jan 2012 at 20:02, Joe Winograd wrote:
> Thanks for the idea, but it will not install. The way this group operates
> with excessive trimming/snipping ...
No it doesn't. It doesn't do *enough* trimming and snipping, and as a result
our inboxes grow exponentially. If I
is in the same directory as the CM
executable and the new ) also fails in the same way as
previously reported.
Regards, Joe
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Kevin Benson <kevin.m.ben...@gmail.com>
To: General Discus
ot to return HP
Connection Manager to a "working" state. Cheers
--
--
--
--ô¿ô--
K e V i N
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
> From: Joe Mistachkin <sql...@mistachkin.com>
> To: 'General Di
Intuit's TurboTax at this time, so there's no way to
get HP Connection Manager installed to determine for sure what
SQLite-related DLLs it installs). Regards, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Joe Mistachkin <
Joe Winograd wrote:
>
> I guess there's no solution that the end-user can deploy in this case.
It's
> not even clear to me how the HP and/or Intuit programmers can solve the
> problem, since I replaced the HP Connection Manager with the
> latest one and TurboTax doesn't even have a anywhere
At 01:08 17/01/2012, you wrote:
´¯¯¯
Richard, Simon, and you are seeing eye-to-eye on this. Earlier in the
thread (since trimmed, of course), it was stated that SQLite was
designed to be tiny so that each app could include the entire system
without draining resources significantly (this would
that's the case,
why not kill the distribution of and force the developers to
do it the right way? Regards, Joe
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Black, Michael (IS) <michael.bla...@ngc.com>
To: General Discussio
You don't need to "register" the SQLite DLL. That's for ActiveX and COM DLLs.
Not ones that just export functions.
The search path stuff is a mess under Microsoft.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682586(v=vs.85).aspx#standard_search_order_for_desktop_applications
Ah, I see that embedded images don't make it in this group, so the screen
shot referred to in my previous message is attached. Regards, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Joe Winograd <j...@winograd.us>
To: G
e
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Black, Michael (IS) <michael.bla...@ngc.com>
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Date: Sunday, January 15, 2012 13:56:33
My point still stands
...@sqlite.org] on
behalf of Joe Winograd [j...@winograd.us]
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:52 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
> I don't really mind top or bottom post.
I don't either, but it really sho
e message. I would
argue that those are "useful bits" of this thread.
I think there are times when trimming is appropriate, but in most cases, I
think that threads should be left intact. Just my humble, of course. Cheers, Joe
---- Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incom
On 13 Jan 2012, at 1:46am, Joe Winograd wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification.
My pleasure. Triggers do generally work in the most useful way. Try coding it
and see if it works for you.
> Btw, is bottom-posting the standard in this group? As you can tell, I'm
> rather fond of top-posting.
ell, I'm rather fond of top-posting. Yes, I've ready
> many of the arguments why bottom-posting is better – I simply don't buy it.
> But I'll be happy to comply with group standards. Regards, Joe
>
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible version
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012 03:59:02
On 12 Jan 2012, at 6:30am,
-boun...@sqlite.org] on
behalf of Simon Slavin [slav...@bigfraud.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:59 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
On 12 Jan 2012, at 6:30am, Joe Winograd wrote:
> Thanks to b
On 12 Jan 2012, at 6:30am, Joe Winograd wrote:
> Thanks to both of you for your responses. I'm back to wondering how SQLite
> can be effective in the PC world with so many different programs using many
> different versions of SQLite. Since all versions are backward compatible, I
> was liking
and Intuit), not at end-users (like me - I
don't have a clue what the GAC is, nor should I have to in order to run
TurboTax). Regards, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Joe Mistachkin <sql...@mistachkin.com>
To: 'Ge
Kevin Benson wrote:
>
> Since the System.Data.SQLite.dll is a mixed assembly (i.e. contains
> both managed & native code) in differing versions for x86 versus x64 ,
> I wonder if HP meant TurboTax was using, for example, an x86 flavor of
> that DLL that conflicts with their (HP) program's use of
ion
> Support\SQLite3.dll
> c:\Program Files (x86)\Nuance\PaperPort\sqlite3.dll
>
> Any other thoughts? Thanks, Joe
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
> From: Joe Winograd <j...@winograd.us>
&g
\sqlite3.dll
Any other thoughts? Thanks, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Joe Winograd <j...@winograd.us>
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2
) and will file a
report with Intuit later today. Thanks again, Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Incompatible versions of SQLite on same system
From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Date: Wednes
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Joe Winograd wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> First time poster here, so be gentle. I have an HP EliteBook 8460w running
> 64-bit W7. HP provides an app called the Connection Manager that allows you
> to control the status of the wired, wireless, and
Hi Folks,
First time poster here, so be gentle. I have an HP EliteBook 8460w running
64-bit W7. HP provides an app called the Connection Manager that allows you
to control the status of the wired, wireless, and Bluetooth connections (it
uses SQLite). CM was working fine until I installed
34 matches
Mail list logo