On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:40:13 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The new look for the SQLite website is now in place,
>if you haven't already noticed:
>
>http://www.sqlite.org/
>
>Even though the new look is "in place" you should
>understand this as a work in progress, not a done
>deal. I am
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The new look for the SQLite website is now in place,
> if you haven't already noticed:
>
> http://www.sqlite.org/
>
> Even though the new look is "in place" you should
> understand this as a work in progress, not a done
> deal. I am still looking for suggestions,
Hi,
the colors of the links are reversed: By default,
links that have not been visited are blue and visited
links are purple. The sqlite website makes visited links
green and unvisited links purple.
This is *very* confusing.
Michael
At 1:40 AM + 11/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new look for the SQLite website is now in place,
if you haven't already noticed:
http://www.sqlite.org/
The feedback from this mailing list has so far been
very helpful. Please don't stop offering suggestions.
So I just looked at
Richard, I like the new website and layout, but find the initial page
much to wordy for an initial screen.
Just a suggestion:
Create lots of white space to the left of the Current Status/Common
Links box and leave the exiting paragraphs, but move them down visually
Something like the
James Dennett wrote:
Dennis Cote wrote:
Dr Gerard Hammond wrote:
The first few words sound incorrect to me.
Shouldn't it be.
"SQLite is an in-process"
and even then I don't know what 'in-process' actually means.
I agree with this completely.
I can't say I have ever heard the term
Dennis Cote wrote:
>
> Dr Gerard Hammond wrote:
> > The first few words sound incorrect to me.
> >
> > Shouldn't it be.
> >
> > "SQLite is an in-process"
> >
> > and even then I don't know what 'in-process' actually means.
> >
> >
> I agree with this completely.
>
> I can't say I have ever
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5) There is no link to the CVStrac home page on the navigation bar
Developers
Richard,
OK. I see that now.
When I saw the Developers link I thought it was a link to the bios and
pictures etc. for you and the
Dr Gerard Hammond wrote:
The first few words sound incorrect to me.
Shouldn't it be.
"SQLite is an in-process"
and even then I don't know what 'in-process' actually means.
I agree with this completely.
I can't say I have ever heard the term in-process before. Perhaps it is
database
assionate developer to join our team building Flex
based products. Position is in the Washington D.C. metro area. If interested
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dr Gerard Hammond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:33 PM
To: sqlite-users
I guess letting developers having opinions about the website is like to
many chefs making a soup. Everyone have different opinions.
I like the new design but have a small comment about the rounded corners
in the menu. If there are rounded corners in the menu - the content
below the menu
At 8:39 PM -0600 11/14/07, andy wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Somebody please suggest a better tag line -
> something better than "The World's Most Widely
> Used SQL Database".
How about:
"Small, Fast, Reliable. Choose any three."
I'm not sure if I heard that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new look for the SQLite website is now in place,
if you haven't already noticed:
http://www.sqlite.org/
YUCK!
What happened?
Yesterday when I looked there was a simple summary of what SQLite was
about centred on screen (the whole page fitted vertically and
I agree; less is more. Way too many words on the front page now.
First, why have nav bars at top AND at the right side? (Plus vertical nav
bars are best put on the left side. )
I'd recommend just (something like) this text on the main page:
SQLite is a free, public domain, compact, embedded
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 5) There is no link to the CVStrac home page on the navigation bar
Developers
--
D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Fisher wrote:
On 14-Nov-2007, at 3:37 PM, John Stanton wrote:
I am looking at it on a wide screen and it does not render to the full
screen width. I would guess that making the toolbar an image would
stop the wrapping. The image would scale to 100%.
I used to think it was a good
On 14-Nov-2007, at 3:37 PM, John Stanton wrote:
I am looking at it on a wide screen and it does not render to the
full screen width. I would guess that making the toolbar an image
would stop the wrapping. The image would scale to 100%.
I used to think it was a good thing when web sites
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Scott Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I probably am misunderstanding something. The box scales down to
narrower windows just fine, so why can't the box scale until it hits
the width of my browser, and _then_ start doing the vertical-wrapping
thing?
There is a CSS
I took a quick look at the page with Firebug and could see that there
are spaces embedded in the toolbar, a Firefox feature. They could be
removed by concatenating the href's onto one line of text. The font
specified plus the spaces renders to a width greater than the table so
it wraps.
I
The navigation bar for me is on 2 lines - Support is wrapped to the
second line. Is that intended? (doesn't look right :))
Dennis
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Suggestions for something better to put on
the home page.
I see the home page has been expanded. Very nice!
I would add some formatting to the overview text to
make it more visually appealing.
Perhaps make each paragraph a bullet item, with the
first sentence in bold:
o *SQLite
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_=D6nnerby?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What happened to the download-page, I only see the "Direct Access To The
> Sources Via Anonymous CVS"?
>
Cockpit trouble. Fixed now.
--
D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Grzegorz Makarewicz wrote:
Michael Scharf wrote:
* Somebody please suggest a better tag line - something
better than "The World's Most Widely
Used SQL Database".
I really like this tag line! However, it would be great if
there would be a link with some information that
On 13-Nov-2007, at 5:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Suggestions for something better to put on
the home page.
Yeah. My first thought when I brought up that page was "There's no way
I'm reading all that text!"... and I already use sqlite. I like the
points it goes over, though.
act [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:59 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Request for help with the SQLite Website
"Scott Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new look for the SQLite website is now in place,
if you haven't already noticed:
http://www.sqlite.org/
Even though the new look is "in place" you should
understand this as a work in progress, not a done
deal. I am still looking for suggestions, comments,
and
m building Flex
based products. Position is in the Washington D.C. metro area. If interested
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:59 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Reques
"Scott Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I probably am misunderstanding something. The box scales down to
> narrower windows just fine, so why can't the box scale until it hits
> the width of my browser, and _then_ start doing the vertical-wrapping
> thing?
>
There is a CSS parameter that
Michael Scharf wrote:
>> * Somebody please suggest a better tag line - something
>> better than "The World's Most Widely
>> Used SQL Database".
>
> I really like this tag line! However, it would be great if
> there would be a link with some information that supports/explains
> this
I probably am misunderstanding something. The box scales down to
narrower windows just fine, so why can't the box scale until it hits
the width of my browser, and _then_ start doing the vertical-wrapping
thing?
-scott
On Nov 14, 2007 10:59 AM, John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There
I would not agree with that. Parallelism is very much architectural if
it to be better than yet another layer of software loading down what is
a non-parallel architecture.
It will be some time before the technology filters down to the mass users.
Joe Wilson wrote:
--- John Stanton <[EMAIL
I notice that in Firefox on Linux with a maximized window on a
1600x1200 screen, the "Support" link in the navbar wraps around. The
navbar still looks nice, but since it's only half the width of my
screen, it shouldn't need to wrap. It also happens with narrower
browser windows, I'm guessing
Threads simulated in software are a kludge to better utilize current
processor and operating system architectures. In time machines where
the parallelism is handled in hardware will be more widely available and
the threading will be transparent and highly efficient.
Joe Wilson wrote:
* Somebody please suggest a better tag line -
something better than "The World's Most Widely
Used SQL Database".
I really like this tag line! However, it would be great if
there would be a link with some information that supports/explains
this statement. Anybody could say "The
Threads are very much in the C tradition - minimalistic.
If you code in C you must know what you're doing anyway.
C is by no means a high level or safe language.
But until an automatically parallelizing safe language with
good performance becomes popular - this is what we got.
You just have to
Why Threads Are A Bad Idea:
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2006/EECS-2006-1.pdf
From the article:
"Threads are a seemingly straightforward adaptation of the
dominant sequential model of computation to concurrent
systems. Languages require little or no syntactic changes to
On 11/13/07, Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you use the idiom whereby each thread solely takes its tasks
> from a thread-safe work queue, you can have a clear separation of
> responsibilities and minimal or preferably no shared-state between
> threads. You get concurrency as a side
--- "D. Richard Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Joe Wilson wrote:
>
> > http://home.pacbell.net/ouster/threads.pdf
>
> JO and I reach a similar conclusion but by different
> reasoning, I think.
I like this line:
Should You Abandon Threads?
* No:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Joe Wilson wrote:
http://home.pacbell.net/ouster/threads.pdf
JO and I reach a similar conclusion but by different
reasoning, I think.
--- Richard Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What? And encourage people to write multitheaded
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Richard Klein wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What? And encourage people to write multitheaded programs?
Not likely...
I've been meaning to ask ... When you say that multiple threads
are evil, do you mean "as opposed to multiple processes"? Or
do you feel
http://home.pacbell.net/ouster/threads.pdf
--- Richard Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What? And encourage people to write multitheaded programs?
> > Not likely...
>
> I've been meaning to ask ... When you say that multiple threads
> are evil, do you mean "as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What? And encourage people to write multitheaded programs?
Not likely...
I've been meaning to ask ... When you say that multiple threads
are evil, do you mean "as opposed to multiple processes"? Or
do you feel that multiprogramming in general is evil?
- Richard
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You might mention the library is multi-thread safe in the Features
> > section of http://www.sqlite.org/about.html
>
> What? And encourage people to write multitheaded programs?
> Not likely...
Good luck with that quest.
Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might mention the library is multi-thread safe in the Features
> section of http://www.sqlite.org/about.html
What? And encourage people to write multitheaded programs?
Not likely...
>
> Do you have a page that describes all the SQLITE_OMIT_* ifdefs
You might mention the library is multi-thread safe in the Features
section of http://www.sqlite.org/about.html
Do you have a page that describes all the SQLITE_OMIT_* ifdefs
and compile options?
Never
I think the "about" text misses some of what, to me, are the most important
parts of SQLite
- in-process
- zero maintenance
Also as a .NET developer I would be put off by the "C-Library" reference.
SQLite works very well in many languages regardless of the fact that it's
written in C.
I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am still looking for suggestions, comments,
> and bug reports.
There is no search on the front page or even anywhere else on the site
that I can find. You don't even have to go to the hassle of adding your
own - Google
This is a big improvement to the website. Keep up the great work on
SQLite. Looking forward to 4.0
On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new look for the SQLite website is now in place,
if you haven't already noticed:
http://www.sqlite.org/
Even though the new look is
48 matches
Mail list logo
