-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 1:50 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Adding additional operators to FTS3
"Samuel R. Neff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The /10 syntax makes sense to prog
"Samuel R. Neff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The /10 syntax makes sense to programmers but I think users are going to
> forget it pretty quickly. Same with "OR" an "NEAR" being required to be all
> caps (I didn't know that). Ideally the UI an application exposes would show
> the user that OR
ested
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 3:45 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Adding additional operators to FTS3
"Scott Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
"Scott Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One thing I'll think on in the background as a how-to-integrate
> question is the balance between sophistication for query experts
> versus the approachability for non-experts. For some systems, having
> things like proximity queries complicates the
t;
> Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 September 2007 19:22
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Adding additional operators to FTS3
>
> "Mike Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Thanks for the quick response, much appreciated. Guess I better go and look
at the query parser.
Thanks again
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 September 2007 19:22
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Adding additional
"Mike Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) We need to be able to index items such as AT, this seems like
> it's a case of replacing the default tokeniser with our own implementation
Correct.
>
> 2) A NEAR query operator so we can do things like 'foo NEAR10 bar'
> which will
7 matches
Mail list logo
