Teg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> dhc> Recompile version 3.5.2 with -DSQLITE_MEMORY_SIZE=1000
> dhc> or however much memory you want SQLite to use. This will
> dhc> create a static array of char[] of size 1000 (or whatever
> dhc> other size you give it) and use that instead of malloc()
On Nov 8, 2007 5:04 PM, PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using Windows Task Manager to determine memory usage. I minimize my
> application (which causes the task manager to show a more accurate
> measurement of memory used) and still the memory usage is enormous.
Windows Task Manager
PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using Windows Task Manager to determine memory usage. I minimize my
> application (which causes the task manager to show a more accurate
> measurement of memory used) and still the memory usage is enormous.
>
>
Recompile version 3.5.2 with
Actually, I am. I abstract the database communication in my application,
but I access each database using their native API.
On Nov 8, 2007 12:44 PM, Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Are you certain it's sqlite RAM, and not your application?"
--- PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Are you certain it's sqlite RAM, and not your application?"
>
> Yes, we are also testing PostgreSQL and MySQL and the application memory
> with those stays < 20 mb.
You're not using the sqlite3 API directly, are you?
If that's the case, I think your
"Are you certain it's sqlite RAM, and not your application?"
Yes, we are also testing PostgreSQL and MySQL and the application memory
with those stays < 20 mb.
"Is your temp_store set to memory or file?"
I have not changed this, so it's whatever the default is.
"How are you performing your
I am using Windows Task Manager to determine memory usage. I minimize my
application (which causes the task manager to show a more accurate
measurement of memory used) and still the memory usage is enormous.
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Roger Binns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP
If you have to set that manually, it was not set. I am using version 3.5.2.
I am doing tens of thousands of transactions, each without ~30 separate
INSERTs.
On Nov 8, 2007 11:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to see if SQLite is suitable
--- PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if SQLite is suitable for large databases ( > 1 gb,
> millions of rows in each of several tables). Initially, the memory usage
> was outrageous (~ 500 mb for a 1.3 gb db), but I got that down to < 30 mb by
> setting the cache size to 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PokerAce wrote:
> Initially, the memory usage
> was outrageous (~ 500 mb for a 1.3 gb db),
How are you measuring memory usage? You have to be very careful as most
operating system tools will report a number greater than the size of all
current
PokerAce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if SQLite is suitable for large databases ( > 1 gb,
> millions of rows in each of several tables). Initially, the memory usage
> was outrageous (~ 500 mb for a 1.3 gb db), but I got that down to < 30 mb by
> setting the cache size to 0 and
11 matches
Mail list logo
