On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46:29PM -0300, Juan Manuel Santos wrote:
> I have to admit that I was a bit annoyed that my zombie "reply to" on this
> mailing list always ended up in the last poster's mailbox. But after reading
> the article posted here about munging considered harmful, I'm definitel
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:22:03PM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
> I'm in the reply munging harmful camp, and use mutt which makes
> it very simple with it's ``L'' to respond to the list.
>
> I have seen too many cases were somebody thought they were making
> a private reply to the sender that went
From: Bill Campbell
To: sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wednesday 14 April 2010
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010, j...@qlf.com wrote:
> >FWIW, the other 3 Python-related lists I'm on all default to reply to the
> >list. I use a mixture of Outlook and Thunderbird. Thunderbird has the
> >'Repl
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010, j...@qlf.com wrote:
>FWIW, the other 3 Python-related lists I'm on all default to reply to the
>list. I use a mixture of Outlook and Thunderbird. Thunderbird has the
>'Reply to List' option, but sadly, Outlook doesn't offer that.
I'm in the reply munging harmful camp, and
ailto:p...@phd.pp.ru]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:57 PM
To: j...@qlf.com
Cc: SQLObject discussion
Subject: Re: [SQLObject] Reply to list (was: Search for Full Name)
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:18:47PM -0500, j...@qlf.com wrote:
> Can the list be setup so that the default reply goes to the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:18:47PM -0500, j...@qlf.com wrote:
> Can the list be setup so that the default reply goes to the list instead of
> your personal address?
It is possible but I am not sure it is desirable. There are two opposite
ways of thinking about it:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/
