On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:57 +0100, Kinkie wrote:
> The idea is nice, but a bit dangerous IMO, as it lends itself to
> abuse. I second that we can try it out, and see how it works out.
I think it will work out well. And in any case there is a second level
human filter to make the actual commit.
>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
>
> > Does it? Most mallocs I know about has details about the allocated
> > region just before the pointer (and optional red zone).
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/jem
http://www.creative.net.au/diffs/test1-355.tar.gz
I've fixed the last few bugs - I'm seeing some occasional connect() failures
from
the ab box to the proxy server but that may be the hacky apachebench code.
I can handle ~ 12,000 proxied connections a second at 96 byte replies.
Userland CPU use s
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 00:25 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I'm looking forward a few weeks to 3.0.STABLE3 by march 31st
Great!
Possibly even a 3.1.DEVEL0 at the same time.
This should probably be discussed on squid-dev, but there are currently
sever
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> The file re-arranging polish:
> - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
> alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
> file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
> alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
> file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.
bzr tracks renames and merges ch
Uhm, I'll do it Amos. It won't take me that long.
I'll wait for your source organisation to be completed before I bring over the
changes.
Adrian
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Squid Web Proxy Wiki"
See:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2271
--
Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The file re-arranging polish:
- I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble t
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 01:52 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> It would be great if bundlebunny could accept email votes without first
> requiring an account. The rules on who may vode is not restricted to
> just squid-core, even if votes from squid-core is more important.
>
> My view regarding the
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 18:54 -0600, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Uhm, I'll do it Amos. It won't take me that long.
>
> I'll wait for your source organisation to be completed before I bring over the
> changes.
It looks like Amos wants the source reorganization to be the last
project committed to v3.1. If
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 18:54 -0600, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Uhm, I'll do it Amos. It won't take me that long.
> >
> > I'll wait for your source organisation to be completed before I bring over
> > the
> > changes.
>
> It looks like Amos wants the sourc
12 matches
Mail list logo
