On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 15:24 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
- I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
- I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.
bzr tracks
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 00:25 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I'm looking forward a few weeks to 3.0.STABLE3 by march 31st
Great!
Possibly even a 3.1.DEVEL0 at the same time.
This should probably be discussed on squid-dev, but there are currently
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The file re-arranging polish:
- I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.
Can
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
- I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.
bzr tracks renames and merges
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The file re-arranging polish:
- I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble
