Re: [squid-users] https://weather.yahoo.com redirect loop

2014-08-20 Thread Amm
headers. I was lazy to find which header exactly but I disabled both anyway. Amm.

Re: [squid-users] https://weather.yahoo.com redirect loop

2014-08-19 Thread Amm
a solution: via off forwarded_for delete Amm

[squid-users] security.use_mozillapkix_verification and squid ssl bump

2014-08-02 Thread Amm
regardless of value of mozillapkix Thanks and regards, Amm

Re: [squid-users] Re: YouTube Resolution Locker

2014-07-26 Thread Amm
On 07/26/2014 02:36 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 26/07/2014 8:36 p.m., Stakres wrote: HI Amm, Everyone is free to modify the script (client side) by sending YouTube urls only, no need to send all the Squid traffic. ... Bye Fred It would be better practice to publish a script which is pre

Re: [squid-users] Re: YouTube Resolution Locker

2014-07-26 Thread Amm
urity risk. Regards, PS: Sorry for being off-topic on squid mailing list. AMM

Re: [squid-users] YouTube Resolution Locker

2014-07-25 Thread Amm
background. Amm

Re: [squid-users] fallback to TLS1.0 if server closes TLS1.2?

2014-07-10 Thread Amm
On 07/11/2014 09:45 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote: On 04/11/2014 11:01 PM, Amm wrote: I recently upgraded OpenSSL from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 (which supports TLS1.2) Now there is this (BROKEN) bank site: https://www.mahaconnect.in This site closes connection if you try TLS1.2 or TLS1.1 When I

[squid-users] Squid 3.4.5 crashes when adaptation_access is used

2014-05-06 Thread Amm
. Please see bug report for details. Thanks and regards, Amm.

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.5 is available

2014-05-05 Thread Amm
. Thanks and regards, Amm. On 05/05/2014 07:39 PM, Martin Sperl wrote: Hi Amos! ... So I wonder if it is really a wise move to potentially cut off people from security patches because they can no longer compile squid on the system they want to use it on just due to the build-tool dependencies

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.4 and SSL Bump not working (error (92) Protocol not available)

2014-04-16 Thread Amm
192.168.10.8 --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.10.254:3127 for 443 intercept use https_port not http_port. Amm.

Re: [squid-users] squid sslbump server-first local loops?

2014-04-13 Thread Amm
should be allowed. But this sslbump still continues and cause infinite loop. Eliezer Amm.

Re: [squid-users] squid sslbump server-first local loops?

2014-04-13 Thread Amm
On 04/13/2014 04:27 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 12/04/2014 5:23 p.m., Amm wrote: So I ran this command: openssl s_client -connect 192.168.1.2:8081 where 8081 is https_port on which squid runs. (with sslbump) And BOOM, squid went in to infinite loop! And started running out of file

[squid-users] squid sslbump server-first local loops?

2014-04-11 Thread Amm
ing server-first? Or shouldn't squid check something like this? If (destIP == selfIP and destPort == selfPort) then break? I am also not sure if this can be used to DoS. So just reporting, Amm.

[squid-users] fallback to TLS1.0 if server closes TLS1.2?

2014-04-11 Thread Amm
n not tell bank to upgrade) Amm.

Re: [squid-users] sslbump - firefox sec_error_inadequate_key_usage

2014-04-11 Thread Amm
> Amos Ok, but then how come Firefox did not throw warning display just yesterday? Squid version and configuration were exact same yesterday. Unfortunately I can not switch OpenSSL back to older version else I would have checked if squid "mimicked" key_usage in that version as well or not? Amm

Re: [squid-users] sslbump - firefox sec_error_inadequate_key_usage

2014-04-11 Thread Amm
d-users/201311/0310.html Amm

Re: [squid-users] sslbump - firefox sec_error_inadequate_key_usage

2014-04-11 Thread Amm
On Friday, 11 April 2014 4:46 PM, Amos wrote: > On 11/04/2014 10:16 p.m., Amm wrote: >> After this upgrade i.e. from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1, Firefox started giving >> certificate error stating "sec_error_inadequate_key_usage". >> >> This does not happen for all

[squid-users] sslbump - firefox sec_error_inadequate_key_usage

2014-04-11 Thread Amm
R this has been resolved? Is it Firefox bug or squid bug? Thanks in advance, Amm.

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to mark tcp_outgoing_mark (server side) with SAME MARK as incoming packet (client side)?

2014-03-16 Thread Amm
utgoing_mark. I just noticed that there was same discussion done in list previously as well (in 2013), here is the link: http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/201303/0421.html Regards Amm

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to mark tcp_outgoing_mark (server side) with SAME MARK as incoming packet (client side)?

2014-03-15 Thread Amm
On 03/15/2014 08:03 PM, Amm wrote: On 03/15/2014 05:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 15/03/2014 6:46 p.m., Amm wrote: I would like to mark outgoing packet (on server side) with SAME MARK as on incoming (NATed or CONNECTed) packet. http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/qos_flows/ Squid

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to mark tcp_outgoing_mark (server side) with SAME MARK as incoming packet (client side)?

2014-03-15 Thread Amm
On 03/15/2014 05:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 15/03/2014 6:46 p.m., Amm wrote: I would like to mark outgoing packet (on server side) with SAME MARK as on incoming (NATed or CONNECTed) packet. http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/qos_flows/ Squid default action is to pass the

[squid-users] Is it possible to mark tcp_outgoing_mark (server side) with SAME MARK as incoming packet (client side)?

2014-03-14 Thread Amm
, Amm.

[squid-users] Re: squid -z for SMP does not create worker's directories

2013-08-27 Thread Amm
timeout error. Anyway, my bug reports follows below. - From: Amm To: "squid-users@squid-cache.org" Sent: Monday, 26 August 2013 4:18 PM Subject: squid -z for SMP does not create worker's directories Hello all, I have following configuration: (For SMP) workers 2 cache_dir

Re: [squid-users] Re: squid and url_regex. Not working

2013-08-19 Thread Amm
-regex-Not-working-td4661633.html @ranmanh Use http_access, always_direct is not for access restriction. Amm.

Re: [squid-users] Re: can we know the ip of transparent proxy ??

2013-08-18 Thread Amm
>Not from the client end. Even NAT interception transparency the proxy IP >is hidden from the client. The server knows, but not the client. > >Amos Unless I misunderstood the original question, combination of curl, www.whatismyip.comand grep should work, shouldn't it? Amm.

Re: [squid-users] Basic questions on transparent/intercept proxy

2013-07-30 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: csn233 > To: Amm > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2013 2:03 PM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Basic questions on transparent/intercept proxy >Thanks to all who replied. Looks like the "ssl_bump none all" is > required to sto

Re: [squid-users] Basic questions on transparent/intercept proxy

2013-07-29 Thread Amm
> From: csn233 >Sent: Monday, 29 July 2013 10:40 PM >Subject: Re: [squid-users] Basic questions on transparent/intercept proxy >On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Amm wrote: >> - Original Message - >> >>> From: csn233 >>> To: "squid-u

[squid-users] MX issues? (was Re: Basic questions on transparent/intercept proxy)

2013-07-29 Thread Amm
-cache.org mail exchanger = 10 squid-cache.org. squid-cache.org mail exchanger = 90 mx2.squid-cache.org. mx2 does not seem to be working. Regards, Amm. - Original Message - > From: Amm > To: "squid-users@squid-cache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, 28 July 2013

Re: [squid-users] Basic questions on transparent/intercept proxy

2013-07-29 Thread Amm
it will log only IPs not the host name or URL. Amm

Re: [squid-users] strip_query_terms by acl?

2013-07-22 Thread Amm
My previous e-mail bounced back. : Mail server for "squid-cache.org" unreachable for too long So reposting, sorry if already it had reached the group. - Original Message - > From: Amos Jeffries >> On 20/07/2013 2:04 p.m., Amm wrote: >>  Hello, >>

[squid-users] strip_query_terms by acl?

2013-07-19 Thread Amm
ing, yahoo Second on will log FULL query for a particular IP. Thanks in advance, Amm

Re: [squid-users] Re: TPROXY

2013-05-28 Thread Amm
> From: Amos Jeffries >To: squid-users@squid-cache.org >Sent: Tuesday, 28 May 2013 4:15 PM >Subject: Re: [squid-users] Re: TPROXY > > >On 28/05/2013 8:11 p.m., Amm wrote: >> >>> From:

Re: [squid-users] Re: TPROXY

2013-05-28 Thread Amm
ly >> and the web pages are showed perfectly. The problem I have is that this >> accesses are not reflected in the access.log and cache.log, so could be >> possible that squid is not caching any cacheable content? I have had exact same problem when I was trying TPROXY with similar configuration. Squid would route packets but not LOG anything in access log. If I stop squid then clients cant access any website. (this indicates that packets are indeed routing through squid). I gave up later on. I might give it a try again after few days. Amm.

[squid-users] vary obkect loop when activating SMP

2013-05-13 Thread Amm
,%20deflate"' 2013/05/13 20:36:21 kid2| clientProcessHit: Vary object loop! Squid works fine though. (from just 5-10minutes testing) Any idea what is the issue? Can it make squid unstable? Or its just a warning of some sort which can be ignored safely? Thanks and regards, Amm.

Re: [squid-users] Looking for squid spec file

2013-05-13 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Alex Domoradov > To: Amm > Cc: "squid-users@squid-cache.org" > Sent: Monday, 13 May 2013 6:22 PM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Looking for squid spec file > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Amm wrote: >> &

Re: [squid-users] Looking for squid spec file

2013-05-13 Thread Amm
For which version of squid do you need spec file? > 3.2 > 3.3 > 3.head > > any of the above ^^ > I had 3.2 but now 3.3 is stable so I don't really care which one of them > I will customize it again. See if this helps in anyway, its from Fedora tree and for 3.3.4 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/squid.git/tree/ Amm > > Eliezer

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3.4 is available

2013-05-07 Thread Amm
ype = HIER_DIRECT;  #endif ++n_tries; +    request->hier.note(serverConn, request->GetHost()); request->flags.pinned = 1; if (pinned_connection->pinnedAuth()) request->flags.auth = 1; Regards Amm. >__

Re: [squid-users] assertion failed: Checklist.cc:287: "!needsAsync && !matchFinished" after upgrade from squid 3.2.7 to 3.3.3

2013-04-10 Thread Amm
che.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3717 Note that patch does not solve the actual bug. Patch just adds -n acl option with which you can disable DNS checks (which cause the crash) Amm.

Re: [squid-users] blocking ads/sites not working anymore?

2013-03-09 Thread Amm
gt; acl ads dstdom_regex -i "/etc/squid3/adservers" > http_access deny ads Dont know how it worked earlier but you need to put http_access deny ads before http_access allow LAN Amm

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3.2 and SMP

2013-03-08 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Alex Rousskov > To: "squid-users@squid-cache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, 9 March 2013 11:54 AM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3.2 and SMP > > On 03/08/2013 07:40 PM, Amm wrote: > > >> Lets say I have tw

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3.2 and SMP

2013-03-08 Thread Amm
other process starts (or forks) which lands on 2nd core Now squid forks 2nd worker and lands on 1st again?! Is this possible? (kind of race condition) Thanks and regards, Amm.

[squid-users] WARNING: (B) '::/0' is a subnetwork of (A) '::/0'

2013-03-07 Thread Amm
a wrong warning or something is really wrong. Because ignoring 127.0.0.1 from localhost, can cause many side effects. I did not happen in 3.3.1. Just for the info, I am using patch for -n acl option at: (to avoid DoS or crashes) http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.HEAD/changesets/squid-3-12620.patch But I doubt that has any relation to this. Regards, Amm.

Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain

2013-03-07 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Amos Jeffries > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Cc: > Sent: Friday, 8 March 2013 2:47 AM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain > > On 7/03/2013 10:54 p.m., Amm wrote: >> - Original Message -

Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain

2013-03-07 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Amos Jeffries > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2013 1:11 PM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain > > On 7/03/2013 7:22 p.m., Amm wrote: >> > >> For testing,

Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain

2013-03-06 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Amos Jeffries > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2013 11:19 AM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain > > On 7/03/2013 5:30 p.m., Amm wrote: >> - Original Message ---

Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain

2013-03-06 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Amos Jeffries > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2013 4:11 AM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain > > On 7/03/2013 2:03 a.m., Amm wrote: >>> >> I just tried 44

Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain

2013-03-06 Thread Amm
63.101.48 - if sslbump server-first applied for request then log shows: 1362574001.569    294 192.168.1.1 TCP_MISS/200 515 GET https://mail.google.com/mail/images/c.gif? - PINNED/2404:6800:4009:801::1015 image/gif (Note: URL may not be same in both cases, these are just example) I dont have IPv6, why is it showing IPv6 address, in 2nd case? Using squid 3.3.2. Regards Amm

Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain

2013-03-05 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Alex Rousskov > To: "squid-users@squid-cache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2013 6:20 AM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain > > On 03/04/2013 10:11 PM, Amm wrote: > >>>  # L

Re: [squid-users] Bypassing SSL Bump for dstdomain

2013-03-04 Thread Amm
or IP range. Ofcourse this assumes that IP will never change for those banks. I am also assuming that squid checks IP based ACLs for ssl_bump before establishing connection with client. (I have personally not tried this setup so can not tell for sure) Or you need to create rules at firewall level which will *not* divert traffic for those sites to squid. Amm.

Re: [squid-users] squid running out of filedescriptors

2013-02-20 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Sandrini Christian (xsnd) > To: "squid-users@squid-cache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2013 3:29 PM > Subject: [squid-users] squid running out of filedescriptors > > Hi > > > Today squid was suddenly running at 100% CPU and a lot of "runnin

Re: [squid-users] Redirect Youtube out second ISP

2013-02-15 Thread Amm
id to redirect youtube out a > second ISP line. We have two connections and I'd like to push all youtube > out the second connection. Try this: acl dstdom_regex yt -i youtube tcp_outgoing_address yt 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.4 is IP address of 2nd line (should be on same machine as squid). Amm.

Re: [squid-users] Squid does not respond to TCP SYN when there are thousands of connection

2013-02-15 Thread Amm
  > ulimit -n must be run as the same user that the proxy is running. > > In debian/ubuntu that user is proxy, and if you type ulimit as root you > will get a different answer that if you type ulimit logged in as proxy user. > > Be sure  to check the ulimit for the right user Or you can check

Re: [squid-users] query about --with-filedescriptors and ulimit

2013-02-14 Thread Amm
es in it. .include /lib/systemd/system/squid.service [Service] LimitNOFILE=16384 3) systemctl daemon-reload 4) systemctl restart squid.service Hope it helps Amm - Original Message - > From: Amm > To: "squid-users@squid-cache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 14 Febr

Re: [squid-users] query about --with-filedescriptors and ulimit

2013-02-14 Thread Amm
Umm your reply confused me further! :) Please see below inline. - Original Message - > From: Amos Jeffries > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > > On 14/02/2013 10:12 p.m., Amm wrote: >> >> I compiled squid using --with-filedescriptors=16384. >> >&g

[squid-users] query about --with-filedescriptors and ulimit

2013-02-14 Thread Amm
Amm.

[squid-users] squid 3.3.1 - assertion failed with dstdom_regex with IP based URL

2013-02-12 Thread Amm
of assertion fails. This bug does not exist in 3.2 as I did not notice it happening in 3.2 So please fix it. Regards, AMM ----- Forwarded Message - > From: Amm > To: "" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012 1:28 PM > Subject: assertion failed with dstdom_regex with IP based URL atleast for > 3.3.0.2

[squid-users] Is squi 3.3.1 stable released?

2013-02-12 Thread Amm
deemed ready for production use, we believe it is ready for wider testing by the community. Also I have not seen any official announcement here in mailing list. Sorry if I missed it. So please clarify if squid 3.3.1 is released as stable and production use, or not? Thank you, Amm.

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.2.5 wants to use IPv6 address?

2012-12-19 Thread Amm
suppose]) Thanks and regards, Amm. - Original Message - > From: Amos Jeffries > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 7:56 AM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.2.5 wants to use IPv6 address? > > > For the record squid-3.2 trie

Re: [squid-users] Bypassing Proxy or SSL bump for specific IPs

2012-11-06 Thread Amm
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/ssl_bump/ - Original Message - > From: Sharon Sahar > For such connections, is there an option to: > > 1. Disable SSL Bump for certain domains / IPs? > 2. Disable squid  for certain domains / IPs?

Re: [squid-users] add DENIED tag by redirector for easy identification in logfile

2012-11-02 Thread Amm
- Original Message - > From: Alex Rousskov > Hi Amm, > >   There is a solution, but it requires switching from a url_rewriter > script to an eCAP adapter. Adapters can set annotations (name:value > "tags") that Squid can log via %adapt::

Re:: [squid-users] Squid and SSL interception (ssl-bump)

2012-10-31 Thread Amm
-- On Wed 31 Oct, 2012 9:03 PM IST Heinrich Hirtzel wrote: >http_port 10.0.1.1.:3128 intercept >https_port 10.0.1.1.:443 ssl-bump cert=/user/local/squid3/ssl_cert/myCA.pm > you have forgotten intercept on https line Amm

Re: [squid-users] add DENIED tag by redirector for easy identification in logfile

2012-10-31 Thread Amm
tains original URL of the page in browser. Redirect otherwise changes the URL in location bar of the browser. And people get confused. And if I recall right then I have also seen some browser complaining about XSS or something, because URL domains do not match. I suppose as of now there is no solution. But thanks again. Regards, Amm

[squid-users] add DENIED tag by redirector for easy identification in logfile

2012-10-31 Thread Amm
/config/external_acl_type/ which says: tag =Apply a tag to a request (for both ERR and OK results) So can redirector do the same? Thanks in advance, Amm

Re: [squid-users] 3.3.0.1 warning on reload - max_filedescriptors disabled

2012-10-24 Thread Amm
: Amos Jeffries >To: squid-users@squid-cache.org >Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2012 6:44 PM >Subject: Re: [squid-users] 3.3.0.1 warning on reload - max_filedescriptors >disabled > >On 24/10/2012 8:00 p.m., Amm wrote: >> looks like somewhere this number 16384 is hard-

Re: [squid-users] 3.3.0.1 warning on reload - max_filedescriptors disabled

2012-10-24 Thread Amm
Further to this on running "squidclient mgr:info" I always get: Maximum number of file descriptors:   16384 be it after start or after reload OR even if i mention max_filedescriptor 1024 or 4096. looks like somewhere this number 16384 is hard-coded in 3.3.0.1 Amm - Origin

[squid-users] 3.3.0.1 warning on reload - max_filedescriptors disabled

2012-10-23 Thread Amm
4-unknown-linux-gnu... It appears that squid crashed and restarted. But there is not much information on why? May be something in forward.cc:217 So just reporting - please check. Thank you, Amm.