Re: [squid-users] This one site (virk.dk) doesn't work through Squid

2012-02-02 Thread Brian Andersen
Thanks Per, I'll try it out. 2012/2/2 Per Jessen p...@computer.org: Brian Andersen wrote: Hi I have squid running on a ubuntu server with shorewall. I am using the default squid config files and I have only blocked one site (which isn't virk.dk). All sites works perfectly, except

[squid-users] forward loop

2012-02-02 Thread Mustafa Raji
hi please i have a forward loop warning in my cache.log what is the cause of it i check the internet and find the cause is using peer squid configuration and the two cache server has the same visible_hostname but i never used the peer in my configuration i have one cache server with intercept

Re: [squid-users] forward loop

2012-02-02 Thread Pieter De Wit
Hi Mustafa, Can you please post your squid.conf ? (Remove all comments and passwords etc) Cheers, Pieter On 2/02/2012 23:04, Mustafa Raji wrote: hi please i have a forward loop warning in my cache.log what is the cause of it i check the internet and find the cause is using peer squid

Re: [squid-users] squidaio_queue_request : warning - queue congestion

2012-02-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2/02/2012 7:11 p.m., Mustafa Raji wrote: --- On Wed, 2/1/12, Amos Jeffrieswrote: From: Amos Jeffries On 02.02.2012 02:17, Mustafa Raji wrote: hi squid user i use squid 3.1.11 with 3 cach_dir aufs 5000 MB and 4GB ram for computer and 512 MB for squid in cache_mem some times i gate this

Re: [squid-users] This one site (virk.dk) doesn't work through Squid

2012-02-02 Thread Brian Andersen
Hi All, I get no errors at all, just a blank page. My squid.conf is here: http://pastebin.com/jc6qpFQm The lines below are the only lines in the log referencing virk.dk 1327906917.099     96 192.168.0.73 TCP_MISS/200 595 GET http://www.virk.dk/cms/render/live/da/sites/virk/home.html -

[squid-users] Improved error pack?

2012-02-02 Thread mailing list subscriber
Hi, The standard squid errors files in /usr/share/squid/errors/ are quite technical in terms, not pleasant to the eye (compared to modern web style) and often not understood by regular users. Is there a errors pack available with some modern design and easy to read by non-tech users? I don't want

Re: [squid-users] Improved error pack?

2012-02-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 3/02/2012 1:25 a.m., mailing list subscriber wrote: Hi, The standard squid errors files in /usr/share/squid/errors/ are quite technical in terms, not pleasant to the eye (compared to modern web style) and often not understood by regular users. http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/langpack/

[squid-users] vanishing coordinator process in squid 3.2

2012-02-02 Thread alex sharaz
Hi, I’m running 3.2.0.14…..build …91 on a number of servers and I’ve noticed that fairly frequently the coordinator process vanishes. There’s nothing in the logs to say that (in this case) kid9 ( 8 worker processes) terminated for any particular reason. I still have worker processes

[squid-users] Squid 3.2.0.14 and Digest Auth

2012-02-02 Thread Will Roberts
Hi, Is anyone using digest auth with squid 3.2.0.14? Can you try accessing your squid with the correct username and wrong password? That fails as I'd expect in squid 3.2.0.13 (and 3.1.18), but succeeds in 3.2.0.14. At the moment I don't see how that could be a problem in my setup, but I'd love to

Re: [squid-users] Improved error pack?

2012-02-02 Thread mailing list subscriber
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: On 3/02/2012 1:25 a.m., mailing list subscriber wrote: Hi, The standard squid errors files in /usr/share/squid/errors/ are quite technical in terms, not pleasant to the eye (compared to modern web style) and often not

[squid-users] ACLs with authenticated users

2012-02-02 Thread Wladner Klimach
Hi everyone! I need my squid to deal with some users in a different way. I'm running kerberos authetication scheme, so only authenticated users can access the cache. How could I make an ACL to group some authenticated users in order to deny or allow some urls especific to them? But notice this,

Re: [squid-users] Squid, wccp2 and Solaris

2012-02-02 Thread Jerry Kemp
no Solaris wccp users at all? On 02/ 1/12 02:44 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote: I am currently running Squid ver 3.1.8 in an OpenIndiana ver b151a zone, and to date, Squid is working great. Now, I would like to be able to do wccp2 using Squid from my Cisco border router to my squid server.

Re: [squid-users] Improved error pack?

2012-02-02 Thread Sebastian Muniz
On 2/2/2012 2:49 PM, mailing list subscriber wrote: A good starting point can be a walkthrough the five popular browsers' error messages (some of them are particularly notorios for hijacking the server error responses): Opera, Safari, IE, Firefox, Chrome - Is this a good enough suggestion? :)

Re: [squid-users] Improved error pack?

2012-02-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 3/02/2012 11:53 a.m., Sebastian Muniz wrote: On 2/2/2012 2:49 PM, mailing list subscriber wrote: A good starting point can be a walkthrough the five popular browsers' error messages (some of them are particularly notorios for hijacking the server error responses): Opera, Safari, IE,

Re: [squid-users] ACLs with authenticated users

2012-02-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 3/02/2012 7:41 a.m., Wladner Klimach wrote: Hi everyone! I need my squid to deal with some users in a different way. I'm running kerberos authetication scheme, so only authenticated users can access the cache. How could I make an ACL to group some authenticated users in order to deny or

Re: [squid-users] vanishing coordinator process in squid 3.2

2012-02-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 3/02/2012 1:35 a.m., alex sharaz wrote: Hi, I’m running 3.2.0.14…..build …91 Which is a beta release. *please* bring beta release problems up in the squid-dev list so the developers who made the change and added the bug can learn about and fix it. Problems with the beta code are

Re: [squid-users] Improved error pack?

2012-02-02 Thread Sebastian Muniz
On 2/2/2012 10:26 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Right. These errors do make it into the view of people without any technical knowledge though. So each of our pages has those technical details and should have a simplified this means description for people who can't understand the technical bits.