Re: [SR-Users] presentce handly_subscribe() protocol/port mismatch to WS endpoint

2017-10-12 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
, which is relevant in this case. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 12.10.17 12:31, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > I will try to do also add_contact_alias that you recommend. Will look on > result and describe it here > > On Oct 12, 2017 13:29, "Yuriy Gorlichenko"

Re: [SR-Users] presentce handly_subscribe() protocol/port mismatch to WS endpoint

2017-10-12 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Sorry - set_contact_alias() On Oct 12, 2017 14:05, "Yuriy Gorlichenko" wrote: > Yep got it. Looks like add_contact_alias should fix my issue > > On Oct 12, 2017 13:37, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > wrote: > >> You have to use set_contact_alias() ins

Re: [SR-Users] presentce handly_subscribe() protocol/port mismatch to WS endpoint

2017-10-12 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi. I added set_contact_alias() insead process i described previously if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog("L_INFO", "{$rm} . from external sources contact : $ct . proto is {$pr} "); set_contact_alias(); handle_subscribe(); t_release(); } But i got next error: presence engine t

Re: [SR-Users] Handle SDP ICE candidates

2017-10-13 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Actually kamailio routes any Request by SIP headers. I suppose your porblem on some another point, independend of ICE or other SDP content 2017-10-13 16:50 GMT+03:00 Thiago Guimarães : > Hello, > > Yuriy Gorlichenko, first of all thank you for your attention. > > What I'm try

[SR-Users] rtcp-mux policy for RTPengine module

2017-10-13 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi all! Some time ago Chromium browser sets rtcpMuxPolicy: required by default (soon on Chrome 58) It means that webRTC based clients not accepts a=rtcp:31757 And uses for RTP and RTCP multiplexing at one port Main trouble that i found: calls between original SIP client and webRTC client (SIP clie

Re: [SR-Users] rtcp-mux policy for RTPengine module

2017-10-13 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Sorry: small fix webRTC clients accepts a=rtcp: but port suppose should be same with m=audio 2017-10-13 22:58 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko : > Hi all! > Some time ago Chromium browser sets rtcpMuxPolicy: required by default > (soon on Chrome 58) > It means that webRTC based clients

Re: [SR-Users] rtcp-mux policy for RTPengine module

2017-10-14 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
----- > > > Log https://freeswitch.org/jira/secure/attachment/26623/originate_log.txt > Ticket https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-10400 > > Sergey > > > > сб, 14 окт. 2017 г. в 0:13, Yuriy Gorlichenko : > >> Sorry: >> sma

[SR-Users] Presence WARNING after publish and no NOTIFY

2017-10-17 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi use 5.0.1 with presence for TCP/UDP endpoints presence works PERFECT but for WS socket presence i see next (small cleaned log here with all described bellow https://pastebin.com/8a77ggj0 ): When WS endpoint subscribes - kamailio After kamailio sends 202 to SUBSCRIBE message (see it on client)

Re: [SR-Users] shared dialogs

2017-10-18 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
As i remember dialog module has db based interpretation. You can share it via db. On Oct 18, 2017 10:16, ": Paolo Visintin - Time-Net S.r.l." < paolo.visin...@timenet.it> wrote: > Hi kamailio users, I'm wondering if there's something already done with > shared dialog among more kamailio instance

Re: [SR-Users] Presence WARNING after publish and no NOTIFY

2017-10-22 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
09:37, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > can you grab the logs from kamailio as well as the sip traffic at the same > time? We need to see all the headers in these sip requests to be able tot > rack what operations have to be done. > > Cheers, > D

Re: [SR-Users] Presence WARNING after publish and no NOTIFY

2017-10-23 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
ip traffic at the >> same time? We need to see all the headers in these sip requests to be able >> tot rack what operations have to be done. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 17.10.17 17:49, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: >> >> Hi use 5.0.1 with presen

Re: [SR-Users] Get value of a custom header param

2017-10-26 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi! Maybe shoud to try @authorization[%s] - shuppoe it should get some entry matches to [%s] didn't checked but maybe it would help. 2017-10-26 18:39 GMT+03:00 Arsen : > Sorry, > hf_value2 instead of the hf_value > and I see nothing in the logs, any ideas? > > Thanks, > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2

[SR-Users] Remove all cpecial characters (\n,\t etc)from xml body

2017-10-28 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi. I building external presentity service for web based phones Main trouble that i have at the xml body of PUBLISH message \n \t characters and because of it can't set body as string to the redis So I trying to find a way to remove special characters form the xml body for get oneline string ins

Re: [SR-Users] Remove all cpecial characters (\n, \t etc)from xml body

2017-10-30 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
by kamailio (this it is not a best idea), think that logic on kamailio side should be as clear as it posible 2017-10-30 12:29 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Hello, > > > On 28.10.17 20:28, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > Hi. I building external presentity service fo

Re: [SR-Users] using bcrypt passwd hashing

2017-11-12 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
You can realize any of auth methods by yourself and include it via config file/kemi on lua/by adding module forexample I added SSO auth without any troubles instead of basid MD5 for some projects. 2017-11-11 18:49 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > Do you know of any mainstream SIP UACs which support a

Re: [SR-Users] using bcrypt passwd hashing

2017-11-13 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
-13 11:22 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > > > On 12.11.17 10:33, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > You can realize any of auth methods by yourself and include it via config > file/kemi on lua/by adding module > > forexample I added SSO auth without any troubles instead

Re: [SR-Users] blf in kamailio dmq cluster

2017-11-29 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi. Just replicate publish messages to second server. On Nov 29, 2017 19:46, "Aidar Kamalov" wrote: > Hello, > > I have two(or more) kamailio servers with dmq module and dmq_usrloc - > sip1.example.com and sip2.example.com > publish and subcribe replication works too. > > BLF works fine if clien

Re: [SR-Users] blf in kamailio dmq cluster

2017-11-29 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
I this here is a way to share user for watcher from any domain using rpc.subscribe command after handle_subscribe() It is availible to make simple service that will be triggered by subscribe request and make fake subscribe request with needed data for other domains. Handle this subscribe also by ha

[SR-Users] How to avoid automatic string to int conversion?

2018-02-07 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi im using kamailio 5.1 with native cfg file and using json_get_value( method) form jsonso module When i get json string that contains strings and i need to have these strings kamailio tries to convert string i find into int and affcource it can't then i see warning and can't get vaules of the s

Re: [SR-Users] How to avoid automatic string to int conversion?

2018-02-08 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
re you use it? Cheers, Daniel On 08.02.18 04:08, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: Hi im using kamailio 5.1 with native cfg file and using json_get_value( method) form jsonso module When i get json string that contains strings and i need to have these strings kamailio tries to convert string i find in

[SR-Users] Strange auth_challenge behaivor on 407

2018-03-26 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi I'm using version: kamailio 5.1.2 I have strange issue with auth_challenge kamialio works as NAT handler. When Register comes kamailio handles nat and save original ip:port at the received field in location table I found that when local port in contact is different than external port reply 40

Re: [SR-Users] Strange auth_challenge behaivor on 407

2018-03-26 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi thx. Yep. NAT handling was moved to branch. So rport called from this handler and never called fpr the 1-st invite. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 16:05 Aqs Younas wrote: > Make sure you are calling force_rport. > > Br, Aqs. > > > On 26 March 2018 at 13:57, Yuriy Gorlichenko wro

Re: [SR-Users] Russian meddling in Kamailio project

2018-04-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Товарищ подполковник! Алексей Балашов нас выдал 2018-04-01 7:53 GMT+03:00 Eric Viel : > Good one Made me really laugh > > Le dim. 1 avr. 2018 00:44, Alex Balashov a > écrit : > >> (Filed by the Geostrategic Open Source Alliance.) >> >> ATLANTA, GA (1 April 2018)--In a twist of events th

Re: [SR-Users] Russian meddling in Kamailio project

2018-04-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
ups... wrong list 2018-04-01 13:39 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko : > Товарищ подполковник! Алексей Балашов нас выдал > > > 2018-04-01 7:53 GMT+03:00 Eric Viel : > >> Good one Made me really laugh >> >> Le dim. 1 avr. 2018 00:44, Alex Balashov

[SR-Users] Possibility of kemi lua to keep lua global vars

2018-04-24 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi For now as I see: every request that calls lua script reevables my global lua variables For example I trying to connect to DB via luasql driver and checking if connection already existis to avoid new connection I have function init() that calls in ksr_request_route() Inside i have ome check

Re: [SR-Users] Working with users using external server

2018-05-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi Look at the http_client or http_async_client modules depending on your needs 2018-05-01 11:09 GMT+03:00 Arik Halperin : > Hello, > > > > I have a project for which I need to get user data(username and password) > from an external server with REST APIs. > > > > What is the best way to achieve t

Re: [SR-Users] WebRTC to SIP gateway

2018-05-09 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi! You can to hande it with add_contact_alias but im not sure it will rewrite transport for you also if you will store contact as it is on your backend it is a big chance that it can be unusefull with your SIP service because conract uri is encrypted and most of b2b servers like asterisk for exam

[SR-Users] jsonrpc http interface cant recognize method

2018-05-29 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi i trying to get htable.dump mytable via jsonrpc request {jsonrpc: "2.0", method: "htable.dump mytable"} { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error":{ "code": 500, "message": "Method Not Found" } } But via kamcmd it wroks perfect Aslo

Re: [SR-Users] jsonrpc http interface cant recognize method

2018-05-29 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
found my mystake: params : { name : "mytable" } closed 2018-05-29 10:53 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko : > Hi i trying to get > > htable.dump mytable > via jsonrpc request > > {jsonrpc: "2.0", > method: "htable.dump mytable"} >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + FreeSwitch + WebRTC

2018-06-14 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
You can watch at the kazoo project examples if you want to avoid rtp proxy On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 23:26 Daniel Tryba wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 04:48:40PM -0300, Emanuel Gianico wrote: > > From the logs I see the jssip throw this error: > > > > "Failed to set remote offer sdp: Called with S

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + FreeSwitch + WebRTC

2018-06-21 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + FreeSwitch + WebRTC >> >> >> >> I'm going to investigate Kazoo samples as Gorlichenko suggested because I >> think using RTPEngine or rtp proxy seems redundant/unnecesary to me since >> FreeSwitch fully supports WebRTC >&

[SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi I know that this is not question too much close to the kamialio users but mostly losed to the RFC specifiacations but this community looks like pretty much close to it that is why I want to ask this question here, that's why sorry and thanks for help in this question: I have a situation when pr

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
te and correct. Nobody should be ignoring a > Route header. > > -- Alex > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 10:27:00AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > > Hi > > I know that this is not question too much close to the kamialio users but > > mostly losed to the RFC spec

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
are not happening, that > could be the reason. > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 10:50:45AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > > Alex thank you for the response > > So all that I found is correct and known looks like correct. > > Then last question confusing me - why some UA

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
viour. A B2BUA like Freeswitch can > do whatever it wants with the other, logically independent call leg. > > See RFC 3261 § 16 for more details. > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 10:50:45AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > > Alex thank you for the response > > So all that I found

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
> caller knows about it. If any of these things are not happening, that > could be the reason. > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 10:50:45AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > > Alex thank you for the response > > So all that I found is correct and known looks like correct. >

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hm... Nice guess I will try to check it Thank you so much for clarify these things Alex! 2018-07-01 11:35 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 11:27:36AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > > So FS in this case ignores single route header and sends request to the

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Gorlichenko : > Hm... Nice guess > I will try to check it > Thank you so much for clarify these things Alex! > > 2018-07-01 11:35 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > >> On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 11:27:36AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: >> >> > So FS in this cas

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
>set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future >requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI >from the Contact header field of the response. 2018-07-02 0:05 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:03:24AM

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
yep I understand that. I just see that in fact ACK soudl ignore Route header if it... Single? 2018-07-02 1:45 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > The "remote target" in this case refers to the request URI, > cosmetically. > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:10:26AM +0300, Y

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
der at the ACK that actually exists 2018-07-02 9:02 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:00:02AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > > yep I understand that. > > I just see that in fact ACK soudl ignore Route header if it... Single? > > What? No. >

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
in the contact field offcource 2018-07-02 9:31 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko : > Sorry for noize from my side > I just cant fully understand dependency: > > I understand that actually route header shoud not be ingnored because it > is shows way for the in-dialog packet > That

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
where myProxy should sent ACK to instead of using Contact in thi case In case direct conntect UAC -> Provider I still need to use Contact field as URI to send ACK to that explained on the 12.1.2 of rfc3261? 2018-07-02 9:46 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:31:02AM +

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Yep this clear for me from the start. For me for now not clear question abot direct connect for now. 2018-07-02 10:00 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:59:12AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > > That was my point also... > > But they sent me lint to

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Anyway thank you so much for your responses I really appreciate your time and your help here 2018-07-02 10:42 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko : > Yep this clear for me from the start. > > For me for now not clear question abot direct connect for now. > > 2018-07-02 10:00 GMT+03:0

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
... both Route heanders contains "lr" Provider based Route header jsut contains only *sip:ip:port;lr *when my testing kamaili regitrar contains *sip:ip:port;lr,ftag=fromtaghere* 2018-07-02 10:45 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko : > Anyway thank you so much for your responses > I really

Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

2018-07-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko : > Jut in update > In kamailio case all goes well > Kamailio sets to UAC Record-Route in the 200 reply and then UAC sends ACK > via Route sent... > > I totally confised... > In both examples from my provider 200 contains Route set but in case of >

[SR-Users] ACK Cseq incrases after 404 on uac_auth()

2018-07-16 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi. I found some additional scenario when kamailio works incorrect with ACK Cseq after succesfull auth with uac_auth but unsuccesfull call: 1.Caller via kamailio as proxy (Cseq 1) 2.Kamailio resends call to provider with Auth method (Cseq 1) 3. Provider answers 401/407 (Cseq 1) 4. Kamailio inrases

Re: [SR-Users] ACK Cseq incrases after 404 on uac_auth()

2018-07-16 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
8-07-16 14:42 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Hello, > > when you re-route to a new destination, can you try resetting the internal > flag with: > > msg_iflag_reset("UAC_AUTH"); > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 16.07.18 10:31, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: &

Re: [SR-Users] ACK Cseq incrases after 404 on uac_auth()

2018-07-17 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Yep that works thx! 2018-07-17 9:14 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Hello, > > one more thing, do: > > $dlg_var(cseq_diff) = $null; > > when you reset the internal flag for uac auth. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 16.07.18 21:13, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:

[SR-Users] Remove branch from branch list

2018-09-11 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi I'm trying to manipulate with branches at the $branch variable. 8 actually need to remove unneeded branch if not passed some checks. For now I Just rewriting uri and dst_uri with some face address but it looks little bit dirty way. Is here any an other more clear way to do this?

Re: [SR-Users] Remove branch from branch list

2018-09-11 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
; Cheers, > Daniel > > On 11.09.18 15:16, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > Hi I'm trying to manipulate with branches at the $branch variable. 8 > actually need to remove unneeded branch if not passed some checks. > For now I Just rewriting uri and dst_uri with some face addr

[SR-Users] issue with rewrite to domain in failure route

2018-09-17 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi I'm building some system with failover trunk but my providers requires to set their doamin in domain part of To Header so when I rewrite it at the my failure_route $td = FAILOVER_PROVIDER my To filed looks like To: what i tried: Move this change to BRANCH_ROUTE: here tried as $td = as uac_re

Re: [SR-Users] issue with rewrite to domain in failure route

2018-09-17 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
n kamialio and replace domain in To header. for example: > subst('/^To:(.*)sip:[^@]*@[a-zA-Z0-9.]+(.*)$/t:\1$avp(sip_address)\2/ig') > With Regards.Mojtaba > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 1:19 PM Yuriy Gorlichenko > wrote: > > > > Hi > > I'm building some s

Re: [SR-Users] issue with rewrite to domain in failure route

2018-09-17 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
domain in To header. for example: > subst('/^To:(.*)sip:[^@]*@[a-zA-Z0-9.]+(.*)$/t:\1$avp(sip_address)\2/ig') > With Regards.Mojtaba > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 1:19 PM Yuriy Gorlichenko > wrote: > > > > Hi > > I'm building some system with

Re: [SR-Users] issue with rewrite to domain in failure route

2018-09-17 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
No. Tried from branch route. пн, 17 сент. 2018 г., 14:25 Sergiu Pojoga : > From which route are you calling uac_replace_to(), failure_route? > > "This function can be used from REQUEST_ROUTE and from BRANCH_ROUTE" > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:05 AM Yuriy Gorlichen

Re: [SR-Users] issue with rewrite to domain in failure route

2018-09-17 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
all is default Maybe I need to set up something there? I jsut did not found anything about it at the docs пн, 17 сент. 2018 г. в 14:42, Sergiu Pojoga : > Ok, what are your UAC parameters? > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 7:34 AM Yuriy Gorlichenko > wrote: > >> No. Tried from b

Re: [SR-Users] issue with rewrite to domain in failure route

2018-09-17 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
t; Best regards, > > Federico > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:32 PM Yuriy Gorlichenko > wrote: > >> all is default >> Maybe I need to set up something there? >> I jsut did not found anything about it at the docs >> >> пн, 17 сент. 2018 г. в 14:42, Ser

[SR-Users] KEMI, Lua external modules and nonblicking operations

2017-05-09 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hi all. I m trying to use KEMI with lua and want to make call http client lua module (external). I want to ask: is it will block kamailio event loop (or somethig like it in kamailio)? For more understanding what im talking about i will provide example with openresty (nginx + lua) It uses nginx cos

[SR-Users] kemi lua routing block as route in standart cfg

2017-08-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Hello. I found how to implement lua routimg logic with cfgengine but didn't found how to include cimple route in lua at the cfg file Presume i have routing logic and want to include my_super_custom_route written with Kemo on lua. How i need to set up my config for it work with both engines? _

Re: [SR-Users] kemi lua routing block as route in standart cfg

2017-08-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
MY_SUPER_ROUTE_IN_LUA is a route written with kemi on lua language. 2017-08-02 14:10 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Hello, > > > On 02.08.17 12:02, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > Hello. I found how to implement lua routimg logic with > > cfgengine but didn't found how to inclu

[SR-Users] Fwd: kemi lua routing block as route in standart cfg

2017-08-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
ive kamailio.cfg with its routing blocks, > but executed some Lua scripts inline, see app_lua exported functions: > > - http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/app_lua.h > tml#app_lua.f.lua_run > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 02.08.17 13:28, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: &

Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: kemi lua routing block as route in standart cfg

2017-08-02 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
ng event_route blocks, let me know which and I can say if > they are available -- many of them are, but some are missing, as I am not > using all the modules available and didn't have the time to dig in all of > them. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 02.08.17 13:42, Yu

<    1   2