On 07/29/2015 08:51 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:19:33AM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello, please see trivial patch attached.
While I was investigating case I found that to access value of
'ldap_purge_cache_timeout' option I need to use enum value
On (29/07/15 17:05), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/07/15 14:07), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
From e6f0d72167fdd6921e173025a0e374996fc156d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik lsleb...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:54:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmap_cache: Rename variables
---
On 07/30/2015 04:15 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (29/07/15 17:05), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
Attached is a new patch set. I also contains fix for #2712 and not just for
#2716. Otherwise there would be a crash. So it would be better
push them together.
Integration test were failing sporadically
On 07/30/2015 05:06 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 07/30/2015 04:15 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (29/07/15 17:05), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
Attached is a new patch set. I also contains fix for #2712 and not
just for
#2716. Otherwise there would be a crash. So it would be better
push them together.
Hi,
the attached patches implement fetching the keytab for one-way trusts on
each sssd restart. This is in order for admin to be able to call service
sssd restart and have fresh keytabs in case the trust was re-established
in the meantime.
Even though retrieving the keytabs is quite expensive
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:24:27PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:10:33AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:43:13PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
I started the review,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:46:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patches implement fetching the keytab for one-way trusts on
each sssd restart. This is in order for admin to be able to call service
sssd restart and have fresh keytabs in case the trust was re-established
in the
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:18:07PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:01:31AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:41:46PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2724 for
me. I haven't yet heard
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:20:31PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:18:07PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:01:31AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:41:46PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes
On (27/07/15 16:12), Michal Židek wrote:
On 07/27/2015 04:05 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (27/07/15 15:58), Michal Židek wrote:
On 07/24/2015 09:51 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (07/07/15 19:45), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
See the attached patch.
Ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2688
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2682
I think this option should stay undocumented since we want the users to
use the correct sorting logic.
From db18a64109d9e49fa8bcdad14f412c6e7159137d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?= pbrez...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jul
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:43:13PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
I started the review, but because the patches are quite big, I will send
my comments in batches. I hope that's fine.
Thank you for the review.
12 matches
Mail list logo
