On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> We should set pagging flag in state and not in local
> variable which is not read anywhere in the function.
>
> Found by clang static analyzer.
>
> Do we need this patch also to stable branch?
>
> LS
>
>
On 08/30/2016 06:35 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
Seems that when I sent the v2 of 7579cf99 and ac35fe74 I attached the
wrong patches that ended up being pushed.
Those patches were incomplete as there are still some leftovers.
My bad, sorry :-\
See these 2 attached patches
Best Regards,
--
On 08/30/2016 05:24 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
We should not ignore return values of functions.
LS
Hi Lukas,
thanks for patch.
LGTM, I am waiting for CI.
Regards
--
Petr^4 Čech
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Bump.
--
Petr^4 Čech
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On (30/08/16 21:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote:
>> >On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
>> >>
sumit-bose's pull request #7: "Fix initgroups with nested groups" label *ack*
has been added
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/7
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
jhrozek commented on a pull request
"""
OK, also looking at gdb confirms this is the right fix of course:
(gdb) frame 0
#0 sdap_initgr_nested_get_membership_diff (mem_ctx=0x1176190, sysdb=0x1120040,
opts=0x1134d90,
dom=0x110b610, group=0x1184b80, all_groups=0x1184a80, groups_count=5,
jhrozek commented on a pull request
"""
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:47:09AM -0700, lslebodn wrote:
> Please provide a test-case (probably a hierarchy of groups)
I was able to reproduce with:
$ ipa group-show group20
Group name: group20
GID: 935600011
Member groups: group10, group11
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote:
> >On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9
On 08/05/2016 11:45 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (15/03/16 12:40), Pavel Březina wrote:
On 12/09/2015 01:16 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:07:10PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2813
I wanted to split include/debug_levels.xml into more
lslebodn commented on a pull request
"""
Please provide a test-case (probably a hierarchy of groups)
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/7#issuecomment-243540136
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9
>
>Ack.
>
>Solves:
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498
Denis wrote a
Seems that when I sent the v2 of 7579cf99 and ac35fe74 I attached the
wrong patches that ended up being pushed.
Those patches were incomplete as there are still some leftovers.
My bad, sorry :-\
See these 2 attached patches
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
From
sumit-bose's pull request #7: "Fix initgroups with nested groups" was opened
PR body:
"""
I think this is a leftover from the change to use fully-qualified names in
sysdb. To verify this you can create a nested group in IPA. Without this patch
the id command will only show the groups the user is
ehlo,
We should set pagging flag in state and not in local
variable which is not read anywhere in the function.
Found by clang static analyzer.
Do we need this patch also to stable branch?
LS
>From 6fb265fc7a41f037e3a380a4af7c60d513f48df4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
ehlo,
We should not ignore return values of functions.
LS
>From f60edd21fd40a2b3d5d7ca0ed0fb9918268f72fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:37:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] SYSDB: Fix error handling in
On (30/08/16 16:59), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>Lukaš,
>
>On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> Clang static analyzer assume that ldb_search can found
>> 0 entries in the tree "cn=sysdb". Thenvariable version
>> could be used uninitialized.
>>
ehlo,
Clang static analyzer assume that ldb_search can found
0 entries in the tree "cn=sysdb". Thenvariable version
could be used uninitialized.
We cannot get to such state in sssd but we already handle
a case for more then one entry.
LS
>From 88da8ca30fbf50c320cd2bf4d79d84925cb0883c Mon Sep 17
jhrozek's pull request #6: "Applications should never define _USE_GNU
themselves, but rely on _GNU_SOURCE" was closed
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/6
... or pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd
jhrozek's pull request #6: "Applications should never define _USE_GNU
themselves, but rely on _GNU_SOURCE" label *pushed* has been added
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/6
___
sssd-devel mailing list
jhrozek's pull request #6: "Applications should never define _USE_GNU
themselves, but rely on _GNU_SOURCE" label *ack* has been removed
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/6
___
sssd-devel mailing list
jhrozek commented on a pull request
"""
* master: 1384d0ce6ea741aefb56b0006b6268d76e6cc2c2
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/6#issuecomment-243453157
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
jhrozek's pull request #6: "Applications should never define _USE_GNU
themselves, but rely on _GNU_SOURCE" label *ack* has been added
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/6
___
sssd-devel mailing list
On 08/30/2016 04:24 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (30/08/16 10:14), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:28:44AM -0400, Justin Stephenson wrote:
On 08/10/2016 04:33 PM, Dan Lavu wrote:
I asked Lukas this but he wasn't positive, is the objectClasses different when
adding
On (30/08/16 13:41), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (30/08/16 13:13), Pavel Březina wrote:
>>On 08/05/2016 05:24 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (04/08/16 14:11), Pavel Březina wrote:
>>> > Simple one liner attached.
>>>
>>> > From 6c3d8d6dba969960590d88bdd9a4ec2e9b4a1bb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On 08/30/2016 01:21 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/30/2016 01:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (30/08/16 13:03), Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/30/2016 12:42 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/25/2016 01:43 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
-/* FIXME: get max_children from configuration file */
-
jhrozek's pull request #5: "Miscellanous patches for the sssd-secrets
responder" label *ack* has been removed
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
jhrozek's pull request #5: "Miscellanous patches for the sssd-secrets
responder" label *pushed* has been added
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
jhrozek's pull request #5: "Miscellanous patches for the sssd-secrets
responder" was closed
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5
... or pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/5/head:pr5
git checkout pr5
On (30/08/16 13:03), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 08/30/2016 12:42 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> On 08/25/2016 01:43 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> > -/* FIXME: get max_children from configuration file */
>> > -auth_ctx->max_children = 10;
>> > +ret = confdb_get_int(be_ctx->cdb, be_ctx->conf_path,
>> >
On 08/30/2016 12:42 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/25/2016 01:43 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
-/* FIXME: get max_children from configuration file */
-auth_ctx->max_children = 10;
+ret = confdb_get_int(be_ctx->cdb, be_ctx->conf_path,
+ CONFDB_PROXY_MAX_CHILDREN, 10,
+
On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9
Ack.
Solves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498
___
sssd-devel mailing list
pbrezina commented on a pull request
"""
Ack.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5#issuecomment-243402484
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On 08/25/2016 01:43 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
-/* FIXME: get max_children from configuration file */
-auth_ctx->max_children = 10;
+ret = confdb_get_int(be_ctx->cdb, be_ctx->conf_path,
+ CONFDB_PROXY_MAX_CHILDREN, 10,
+ _children);
+if
On (30/08/16 10:14), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:28:44AM -0400, Justin Stephenson wrote:
>> On 08/10/2016 04:33 PM, Dan Lavu wrote:
>> > I asked Lukas this but he wasn't positive, is the objectClasses different
>> > when adding 'ldap_sudo_search_base' ? Or is it just location?
On 08/30/2016 10:14 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:28:44AM -0400, Justin Stephenson wrote:
On 08/10/2016 04:33 PM, Dan Lavu wrote:
I asked Lukas this but he wasn't positive, is the objectClasses different when
adding 'ldap_sudo_search_base' ? Or is it just location?
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 03:10:39PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> We used internal fq name in ldap filter
> with id_provider proxy to files and auth provider
> ldap
>
ACK
thank you for catching this.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:28:44AM -0400, Justin Stephenson wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 04:33 PM, Dan Lavu wrote:
> > I asked Lukas this but he wasn't positive, is the objectClasses different
> > when adding 'ldap_sudo_search_base' ? Or is it just location?
> >
> > Eitherway, I think this is going to
On (30/08/16 09:41), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 08/30/2016 08:47 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/30/2016 08:28 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> > > On 08/15/2016 02:58 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Those 3
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:54:53PM -0400, Justin Stephenson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The attached patches resolve https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3142
>
> However, I am having difficult with the man page addition to
> 'src/man/sssd.conf.5.xml' for this new option. I have stared at the open and
>
On 08/30/2016 08:28 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/15/2016 02:58 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
Those 3 patches are from Jakub and I've just done some minor
adjustments and add myself as co-author of the first 2 patches.
On 08/27/2016 06:54 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
Hello,
The attached patches resolve https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3142
However, I am having difficult with the man page addition to
'src/man/sssd.conf.5.xml' for this new option. I have stared at the open
and close xml tags(for far too
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 08/15/2016 02:58 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>
>> Those 3 patches are from Jakub and I've just done some minor
>> adjustments and add myself as co-author of the first 2 patches.
>>
>> CI has passed:
On 08/15/2016 02:58 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
Those 3 patches are from Jakub and I've just done some minor
adjustments and add myself as co-author of the first 2 patches.
CI has passed: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/51/55/summary.html
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
Hello,
CI
44 matches
Mail list logo