On (06/04/16 15:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:16:20PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:39:39AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016
On (07/04/16 09:20), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (06/04/16 18:44), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> ehlo,
>>>
>>> There were failures[1] on rhel6 machine with latest packages.
>>> it took me a while to find out which package cuaed it.
>>>
On (06/04/16 15:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was doing a smoke-test with Windows Server 2016 after receiving
>several requests from users (mainly about IDMU deprecation) and find out
>that WS 2016 reports a higher Domain Compatibility level.
>
>Even though that Windows Server release is not
On (07/04/16 09:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (06/04/16 15:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I was doing a smoke-test with Windows Server 2016 after receiving
>>several requests from users (mainly about IDMU deprecation) and find out
>>that WS 2016 reports a higher Domain Compatibility level.
On (06/04/16 18:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm sorry I didn't catch this when I developed the original patch, but
>today I was trying to write the leak patches as Lukas suggested the
>other day..I haven't succeeded at that yet, but I found another leak.
>
Even if you will not able to write a
On (06/04/16 16:14), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (03/03/16 13:50), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >ehlo,
>> >
>> >review is appreciated.
>> Bump
>>
>> LS
>
>I'm sorry for the late review. The patches seem to work fine, without
>them, I
On (06/04/16 17:47), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:10:02PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:17:00PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > On (31/03/16 09:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > >On (18/03/16 17:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > >>On (17/03/16 23:17),
On (06/04/16 18:44), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> There were failures[1] on rhel6 machine with latest packages.
>> it took me a while to find out which package cuaed it.
>> Therefore I downgraded rhel machine to vanilla
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:16:21AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (06/04/16 18:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm sorry I didn't catch this when I developed the original patch, but
> >today I was trying to write the leak patches as Lukas suggested the
> >other day..I haven't succeeded
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:12:17AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (06/04/16 15:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was doing a smoke-test with Windows Server 2016 after receiving
> >several requests from users (mainly about IDMU deprecation) and find out
> >that WS 2016 reports a higher
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 3:27 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>
>> On (06/04/16 15:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:16:20PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:39:39AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Apr 6, 2016,
On 04/07/2016 11:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:16:21AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (06/04/16 18:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry I didn't catch this when I developed the original patch, but
today I was trying to write the leak patches as Lukas suggested the
12 matches
Mail list logo