URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/475
Title: #475: LDAP: Only add a sdap_domain instance for the current domain when
instantiating a new ad_id_ctx
jhrozek commented:
"""
I spent some today trying to understand this issue better so that I can explain
it better in the PR. I think the patch
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/475
Title: #475: LDAP: Only add a sdap_domain instance for the current domain when
instantiating a new ad_id_ctx
jhrozek commented:
"""
Umm OK, right what I wrote the previous wall of text, I realized the patch
might have been wrong. But at the same
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/491
Title: #491: AD: Inherit the MPG setting from the main domain
Label: +Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/491
Title: #491: AD: Inherit the MPG setting from the main domain
fidencio commented:
"""
CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/83/04/summary.html
ACK!
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/491#issuecomment-357920710
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/491
Title: #491: AD: Inherit the MPG setting from the main domain
Label: +Pushed
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/491
Title: #491: AD: Inherit the MPG setting from the main domain
lslebodn commented:
"""
master:
* 29ebf45f96b13590ae76a19c7c16c53f172e4ae4
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/491#issuecomment-357939486
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/491
Author: jhrozek
Title: #491: AD: Inherit the MPG setting from the main domain
Action: closed
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/491/head:pr491
git checkout pr491
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/487
Title: #487: SYSDB: Fix sysdb_search_by_name() for looking up groups in MPG
domains
pbrezina commented:
"""
> A comment in the if would be nice. Also having sysdb_domain_base_dn similar
> to what we have for user/group would be nicer.
I don't see
On 01/10/2018 05:00 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:30:16PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 09:42:16PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a design page about exposing the functionality that creates the
user private groups based on the user entry only:
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/487
Title: #487: SYSDB: Fix sysdb_search_by_name() for looking up groups in MPG
domains
Label: +Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/487
Title: #487: SYSDB: Fix sysdb_search_by_name() for looking up groups in MPG
domains
jhrozek commented:
"""
I'm sorry, I stopped reading your comment after LGTM :-)
(No, really, I forgot..)
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/485
Title: #485: Support alternative sources for the files provider
pbrezina commented:
"""
#jhrozek So if I understand it correctly, if you store users and the group is
already stored the memberof attribute is not populated?
Anyway, this is not
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/457
Title: #457: ipa: Removal of umask(0) in selinux_child
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (15/01/18 09:28), Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>[root@centos7 targeted]# rpm -q libsemanage
>libsemanage-2.5-8.el7.x86_64
>[root@centos7 targeted]# ls -ld
13 matches
Mail list logo