[SSSD] [sssd PR#345][comment] Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests

2017-08-09 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/345 Title: #345: Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests lslebodn commented: """ >I think the fact that the increased timeouts helped stabilize the tests is >helpful information. I did not look into the issue itself yet, but it may help

[SSSD] [sssd PR#345][comment] Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests

2017-08-09 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/345 Title: #345: Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests mzidek-rh commented: """ I think the fact that the increased timeouts helped stabilize the tests is helpful information. I did not look into the issue itself yet, but it may help

[SSSD] [sssd PR#345][comment] Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests

2017-08-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/345 Title: #345: Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests fidencio commented: """ Anyways, I do not have any motivation to work further in this PR (and that's the reason I did not assigned the bug to myself). I'm closing the PR as rejected.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#345][comment] Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests

2017-08-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/345 Title: #345: Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests fidencio commented: """ @lslebodn, I was just pointing to @jhrozek the tests that have been failing (as he asked). """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#345][comment] Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests

2017-08-09 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/345 Title: #345: Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests lslebodn commented: """ On (09/08/17 12:24), fidencio wrote: >@jhrozek: about the 15 seconds timeout, please, take a look at:

[SSSD] [sssd PR#345][comment] Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests

2017-08-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/345 Title: #345: Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests fidencio commented: """ @jhrozek: about the 15 seconds timeout, please, take a look at: http://vm-058-233.$ABC/logs/job/72/75/debian_testing/ci-build-debug/ci-make-intgcheck.log and

[SSSD] [sssd PR#345][comment] Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests

2017-08-09 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/345 Title: #345: Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests lslebodn commented: """ FYI: here is an example why you cannot blindly increase timeout in test. Lets assume that we have a failing test which should test midpoint refresh for some

[SSSD] [sssd PR#345][comment] Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests

2017-08-09 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/345 Title: #345: Improve the situation of recurrent failing CI tests lslebodn commented: """ Changing hardcoded timeout without explanation "why" is not sufficient solution. (because you might hide a bug). And purpose of tests is to find bugs. Therefer