Re: [Standards] Comments on Chat Markers

I have updated the XEP based on the feedback. Regards Spencer On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Spencer MacDonald spencer.macdonald.ot...@gmail.com wrote: No your correct, I was trying to stick to the naming from other XEPs but it doesn't quite fit. Regards Spencer On Sunday, 7 July

Re: [Standards] Comments on Chat Markers

The revised proposal has been pushed to the inbox: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/chat-markers.html Peter On 7/9/13 5:07 AM, Spencer MacDonald wrote: I have updated the XEP based on the feedback. Regards Spencer On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Spencer MacDonald

Re: [Standards] Fwd: Minutes 20130703

Hello Thanks for all input on the HTTP over XMPP proposal. Following are my comments to Kevins suggestions: 2) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/http-over-xmpp.html Accept as experimental? Matt, Matt, Ralph don't object. Tobias and Kev have a fortnight to object on list. [Kev

Re: [Standards] XMPP URI usage in HTTP over XMPP

On 7/9/13 9:53 PM, Peter Waher wrote: I've attached the latest revision for your revision. Pushed to the inbox: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/http-over-xmpp.html Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/

Re: [Standards] XMPP URI usage in HTTP over XMPP

hat type='registrar'/ On 7/9/13 9:53 PM, Peter Waher wrote: Hello Ralph Thanks for your mail. You're absolutely correct. It was sloppy of me to propose a URI scheme with the same name as the previous xmpp scheme. I'm sorry. I've therefore renamed the scheme to httpx (§4.3.1.1 ff). This

Re: [Standards] XMPP URI usage in HTTP over XMPP

Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: hat type='registrar'/ On 7/9/13 9:53 PM, Peter Waher wrote: Hello Ralph Thanks for your mail. You're absolutely correct. It was sloppy of me to propose a URI scheme with the same name as the previous xmpp scheme. I'm sorry. [ .. ] Defining a