On 27 September 2017 at 18:05, Sam Whited wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's time for another round of reviews of the 2017 Compliance Suites
> [1]. I think all the changes that people suggested last time have been
> addressed. Anything else before we move it to the official
>
Hi all,
It's time for another round of reviews of the 2017 Compliance Suites
[1]. I think all the changes that people suggested last time have been
addressed. Anything else before we move it to the official
recommendation?
—Sam
[1]: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0387.html
--
Sam Whited
On 27 September 2017 at 16:37, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> aioxmpp as client library supports this XEP minus ALPN. If ALPN support in a
> second client implementation is all it needs, I can probably fix that in a
> week or so (I took a quick look, the TLS library supports it). I
2017-09-27 XSF Council Minutes
==
Present: Tobias, SamWhited, daniel, dwd
Minute taker: jcbrand
1) Vote on "XEP-0060: Add pubsub#multi-items in Publish-Subscribe features #500"
The URL: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/500
Tobias, daniel and SamWhited will all
On Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 08:51:48 CEST Dave Cridland wrote:
> The rules on "two implementations" are, I believe, aimed to correspond
> to RFC 2026's Section 4.1.2, with the addition of licensing
> requirements.
>
> I'd note, in particular, the second paragraph:
>
>The requirement for
Hi,
my missing votes are inline.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:46 PM, JC Brand wrote:
> 2017-09-20 XSF Council Minutes
> ==
>
> Present: Tobias, Link Mauve, SamWhited, jonasw, daniel
> Minute taker: jcbrand
>
> 1) Vote on accepting "Consistent Color
On 27 Sep 2017, at 15:08, Sam Whited wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, at 02:08, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> Are they not then going to be upset if there are backwards-incompatible
>> changes in a new namespace? We try not to do that in Draft XEPs, but
>> that’s the reason they’re
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, at 02:08, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Are they not then going to be upset if there are backwards-incompatible
> changes in a new namespace? We try not to do that in Draft XEPs, but
> that’s the reason they’re Draft rather than Final, to give us that
> option.
"Stableish"?
—Sam
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:33:07 +0100
Dave Cridland wrote:
> But in any case, I think we can declare victory.
Neat.
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe:
On 27 September 2017 at 11:34, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:10:58 +0300
> Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
>
>> Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:17:14 +0100
>> Dave Cridland wrote:
>>
>> > I believe I have the right records and code running
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:10:58 +0300
Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:17:14 +0100
> Dave Cridland wrote:
>
> > I believe I have the right records and code running at
> > dave.cridland.net if you'd like to try.
>
> Yes, it works (connected to
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:17:14 +0100
Dave Cridland wrote:
> I believe I have the right records and code running at
> dave.cridland.net if you'd like to try.
Yes, it works (connected to 5270 port and TLS auth is accepted), but
your server then connected on my _xmpp-server port,
On 27 September 2017 at 10:09, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:51:48 +0100
> Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>> * We have one S2S implementation, supporting SNI.
>>
>> On that basis, I don't *think* we can include S2S in Final, which is
>> frustrating.
On 27 September 2017 at 02:37, Travis Burtrum wrote:
> On 09/25/2017 06:57 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> On 25 September 2017 at 06:06, Travis Burtrum wrote:
>>>
>>> Conversations has had support since before this became a XEP actually.
>>>
>>> Everyone I
On 26 Sep 2017, at 20:35, Sam Whited wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017, at 14:19, Ivan Vučica wrote:
>> And now, to bikeshed a bit on the proposed naming: To a casual reader,
>> stable has similar implications as final. Especially if said reader is
>> used to Debian's use of
On 26 September 2017 at 20:19, Ivan Vučica wrote:
> And now, to bikeshed a bit on the proposed naming: To a casual reader,
> stable has similar implications as final. Especially if said reader is used
> to Debian's use of the word.
I think to developers, the two *do* have
16 matches
Mail list logo