Re: [Standards] Council Voting Summary 2019-10-08

2019-10-10 Thread JC Brand
Am 10. Oktober 2019 12:38:53 MESZ schrieb Kevin Smith >> Proposed XMPP Extension: Message Moderation - >https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/message-moderation.html > >> Dave: [pending] >> Georg: [on-list] >> Jonas: [on-list] >> Kev:

Re: [Standards] Council Voting Summary 2019-10-08

2019-10-10 Thread Kevin Smith
On 8 Oct 2019, at 15:09, Tedd Sterr wrote: > 2019-09-25 (expiring 2019-10-09) > > PR #824 - XEP-0060: Add pubsub#public in Publish-Subscribe features - > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/824 > Dave: [on-list] > Georg: [on-list] > Jonas: [on-list] > Kev:

Re: [Standards] Feedback to Compliance Suites 2020

2019-10-10 Thread Evgeny
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:20 AM, JC Brand wrote: Now you're saying "limitation", previously you said "restriction". I use those words interchangeably in this context. ___ Standards mailing list Info:

Re: [Standards] Feedback to Compliance Suites 2020

2019-10-10 Thread Evgeny
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:59 AM, JC Brand wrote: Well, to come back to Georg's point of not deprecating BOSH until we have a solution, it seems that XEP-0397 would need to be included in the compliance suite, at least for this particular use-case (maintaining anonymous logins over

Re: [Standards] Feedback to Compliance Suites 2020

2019-10-10 Thread JC Brand
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:01:56AM +0300, Evgeny wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:52 AM, JC Brand wrote: > > You're arguing against a point nobody made. > > > > Nobody advocated using BOSH to bypass restrictions in XEP-0198. > > The issue Georg mentioned isn't due to anything in XEP-0198. > >

Re: [Standards] Feedback to Compliance Suites 2020

2019-10-10 Thread Evgeny
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:52 AM, JC Brand wrote: You're arguing against a point nobody made. Nobody advocated using BOSH to bypass restrictions in XEP-0198. The issue Georg mentioned isn't due to anything in XEP-0198. The issue is with the SASL anonymous login mechanism not allowing you to

Re: [Standards] Feedback to Compliance Suites 2020

2019-10-10 Thread JC Brand
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:13:59PM +0200, Jonas Schäfer wrote: > On Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2019 21:01:18 CEST JC Brand wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 05:24:49PM +0200, Georg Lukas wrote: > > > * Evgeny [2019-10-09 17:08]: > > > > I would like to see BOSH dropped and moving the XEP to historical

Re: [Standards] Feedback to Compliance Suites 2020

2019-10-10 Thread JC Brand
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:24:54PM +0300, Evgeny wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:20 PM, Evgeny wrote: > > I still doubt this is anyhow more secure than session resumption in > > XEP-0198 (which btw requires real re-authentication). > > Let me explain: using BOSH to bypass restriction of