[Standards] multiple roster sources

2010-10-09 Thread Fabio Forno
this is a priority in order to make things work smoothly), since basically they need to issue multiple roster requests and merge locally the rosters. If there is interest I start writing a xep documenting the protocol -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XEP-0184 business rules for message receipts

2010-02-25 Thread Fabio Forno
. These modifications suit better the semantics of message stanzas, but we also accept that we can miss receipts for messages which are actually delivered (just to remember that when we need a prompt ack from an online resource iq pubsub events work better). -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http

Re: [Standards] IQ Pubsub again (was Re: Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15)

2010-02-19 Thread Fabio Forno
be an incentive for supporting presence subscriptions with the pubsub service. bye -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] IQ Pubsub again (was Re: Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15)

2010-02-19 Thread Fabio Forno
that's what Fabio is getting at. Yep, last year we discussed several options for having some sort of end to end flow control, and at the end the only working and simple solution are IQs -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] IQ Pubsub again (was Re: Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15)

2010-02-19 Thread Fabio Forno
and the client pulls their payload with IQs -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XEP-0047: IBB

2010-02-19 Thread Fabio Forno
Closing the Bytestream. *** Because the changes are starting to become more significant, I've posted an interim build here: http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0047-1.3.html Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id

Re: [Standards] Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15

2010-02-18 Thread Fabio Forno
of delivery and XEP 198 does not solve this). -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] IQ Pubsub again (was Re: Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15)

2010-02-18 Thread Fabio Forno
must be turned on - yep, it works just with presence subscriptions to the pubsub nodes, but one of the features I usually miss in standard pubsub services for real applications is a decent handling of presence subscriptions -- Fabio Forno, Ooros srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XEP-0047: IBB

2010-02-17 Thread Fabio Forno
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: *** I think it needs to be more specific about the error types, as you suggest. So something like this: *** It is also possible that the recipient might detect an error with the data packet, e.g. because the

Re: [Standards] XEP-0047: IBB

2010-02-13 Thread Fabio Forno
traffic. When reopening a S2S connection it could happen that some IQs are lost (noticed the problem with some servers) and still being able to retry could be useful. -- Fabio Forno, Ooros srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0226 (Message Stanza Profiles)

2009-11-16 Thread Fabio Forno
method to understand which part of the message is the real payload, and which part is just a fallback (usually a body explaining why something has failed) bye -- Fabio Forno, Ooros srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

[Standards] Action rules in XEP-0050

2009-09-25 Thread Fabio Forno
in paragraph 3.4, in the third bullet: next/ and complete/ MUST not be used together. bye -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] Action rules in XEP-0050

2009-09-25 Thread Fabio Forno
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote: On Fri Sep 25 10:29:44 2009, Fabio Forno wrote: Re-reading XEP-0050 for an implementation issue I've found nothing that forbids sending the actions next/ and complete/ together. Imho it is a nonsense and I think nobody

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Linked Process Protocol

2009-09-24 Thread Fabio Forno
different persons showed up, so good luck! ;) bye -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] length of disco attributes

2009-09-23 Thread Fabio Forno
talks about several related attacks, of which this one is probably the most minor. Just realized that I'm many messages behind in that thread, so ignore my previous mail, I'm not adding entropy where there is already plenty ;) -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Linked Process Protocol

2009-09-23 Thread Fabio Forno
feedback for the infrastructure and even if the council doesn't decide to accept them as XEPs I think that we could provide some official space for discussion (e.g. more mailing lists? ;) ) -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XSF scope

2009-09-23 Thread Fabio Forno
. when people really understand wave - I've still do 100% myself indeed ;) - we'll see floods here) bye -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] to be deferred

2009-09-19 Thread Fabio Forno
containing a binary value. The great advantage of this format is that the type and the length of each token is known in advance and no escaping is needed, therefore it is possible to make very efficient parsers and serializers (in our experiments 3x than normal xml serialization) -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo

Re: [Standards] to be deferred

2009-09-19 Thread Fabio Forno
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Matthew Wild mwi...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, jokes aside this is exactly the kind of thing I had in mind. :) If anybody wants to experiment we have a python and a java implementation, just ask... this is one those things that needs feedback ;) -- Fabio Forno

Re: [Standards] Replacement for disco-publish

2009-09-17 Thread Fabio Forno
, for your use case, these are not the droids you are looking for. I would stick with pubsub: a lot of people are working on it, so you will probably find more good quality code for the server-side components. +1 -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] subdomains

2009-09-10 Thread Fabio Forno
a subdomain trusted and autoaccept all subscribe from that subdomain) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] subdomains

2009-09-10 Thread Fabio Forno
consideration about what is what we call a subdomain, but the correct approach is indeed that. The protocol shall not have the concept of subdomain, if somebody wants to consider something a subdomain for configuration or application issue is free to do that. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http

Re: [Standards] subdomains

2009-09-10 Thread Fabio Forno
are locally routed by most servers even if there is no real address associated to them. Therefore in general we think that they are something that exists only in the server namespace -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] [xmpp] 3920bis: reliability

2009-09-10 Thread Fabio Forno
2009/9/10 Fabio Forno fabio.fo...@gmail.com: Although the core XMPP technology defined in this specification does not contain features to overcome this lack of reliability, XMPP extensions exist to rectify this problem (for example [XEP-0198]). I like this formulation I don't know why

Re: [Standards] separation of routing and payload

2009-09-08 Thread Fabio Forno
found (I wouldn't know how to avoid it without parsing the inner xml) Finally a question for server developers: where is the need of this kind optimizations? Internal routing, c2s, s2s? -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-16 Thread Fabio Forno
which is the real problem? Just duplicated entries, which will be seen by the new client only, and we can cope with them while merging the rosters and giving precedence to the component's entries. The benefits are so high that we can live with this little issue ;) bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo

Re: [Standards] Roster changes

2009-07-16 Thread Fabio Forno
aesthetics (and nobody forbids to use it privately, if you can't upgrade the server) bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-16 Thread Fabio Forno
their own roster to other clients? I'd say no in the case, roster providers can be just domain jids. bye On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Fabio Fornofabio.fo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Pedro Melom...@simplicidade.org wrote: [...[ -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Ooros srl

Re: [Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-16 Thread Fabio Forno
if e.g. I could share my roster with you? I was just wondering if a client entity could be a roster provider for a different client entity. I've no idea of possible applications, and I'd forbid it, but perhaps it's just lack of vision ;) bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] Roster changes

2009-07-16 Thread Fabio Forno
: iq type='get' query xmlns='jabber:iq:roster' jid='k...@example.org' foo xmlns='http://example.net/megaprotocol/'/ bar xmlns='http://example.net/otherthing/'/ /query /iq -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] Roster changes

2009-07-15 Thread Fabio Forno
) - the ability of handling multiple roster sources, as discussed in the other thread in xep 144 The good thing of both is that they just add something that can be ignored by unaware clients and servers. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] Roster changes

2009-07-15 Thread Fabio Forno
for handling multiple sources the two namespaces are just a temporary hack for allowing the messages pass through the server, but the implementation is the same -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] Roster changes

2009-07-15 Thread Fabio Forno
, which are ugly as well, but at least they are implemented [1] I think that is one of the things where it is better to work in private in small groups and start public discussion only when there is a complete proposal -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f

Re: [Standards] Roster changes

2009-07-15 Thread Fabio Forno
requests with your favorite server codebases and I would bet they will fix this before draft-ietf-xmpp-3921bis becomes an RFC. :) What about clients that don't check the from, which is legit since they trust the server? For them we introduce a temporary security issue -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D

Re: [Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-14 Thread Fabio Forno
into the server, is to directly tell the client what to do. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-14 Thread Fabio Forno
nobody uses the same client for teh desktop or mobiles) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Ooros srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

[Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-13 Thread Fabio Forno
is not very usable, I think for the lack of testing since no transport is using it) - planning to use it, in that case any suggestion? bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-13 Thread Fabio Forno
, so that we can compare the result with the contacts we have in the roster and detect deletions too; as you say this can be done with an ad hoc command too, in that case I'd like to write an example in the xep in order to document the practice. bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http

Re: [Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-13 Thread Fabio Forno
-- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] xep - 144

2009-07-13 Thread Fabio Forno
send an ad hoc command containing the block of roster commands that the client should apply, ad we wait for the list of accepted commands as result bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] xep-0136 message archiving

2009-07-13 Thread Fabio Forno
already started many times, but what do we define as a conversation? -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] more obsolete specs

2009-06-02 Thread Fabio Forno
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: OK. Feel free to work on the spec. I can give you SVN access. :) Aye sir! -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] more obsolete specs

2009-05-30 Thread Fabio Forno
to the sender after the user has processed the additions would solve the problem (we just need a session-id for linking the this notification to the triggering first request). bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] more obsolete specs

2009-05-29 Thread Fabio Forno
-- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0138 (Stream Compression)

2009-04-30 Thread Fabio Forno
been established but no compression has been activated. I see no harm in telling that stream compression MAY be offered after TLS if TLS doesn't succeed in activating compression (so far we haven't been able to to it with any server) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber

Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0138 (Stream Compression)

2009-04-30 Thread Fabio Forno
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Fabio Forno fabio.fo...@gmail.com wrote: I've just a problem with the business rules, specifically these ones # TLS compression and stream compression SHOULD NOT be used simultaneously. # If both TLS (whether including TLS compression or not) and stream

Re: [Standards] XEP-0237: version == sequence number?

2009-04-24 Thread Fabio Forno
(bootstrap=true?) rather than overload 'ver'. Sorry but I don't get the purpose of this. Isn't sufficient to omit ver for bootstrapping? -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] [Fwd: Re: LAST CALL: XEP-0237 (Roster Versioning)]

2009-04-17 Thread Fabio Forno
, not the last full roster update). That kind of thing is great but IMHO it doesn't really belong in an RFC. +1 In fact in our implementation based on the current xep we haven't seen any real issue that can't be dealt with good heuristics -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber

[Standards] crazy idea of the day: Oauth'ed sessions

2009-04-15 Thread Fabio Forno
and I don't want to use their ugly chat, but my real JID and I don't want to give away my password) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] roster partial activation privacy lists

2009-04-11 Thread Fabio Forno
and doing a bit of group and rule name standardization as for dataforms could solve many of the problems with them. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] unavailable presence from bare JID

2009-04-09 Thread Fabio Forno
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: In fact I suppose someday (not anytime soon!) some people might want to get rid of resource entirely, but that'll happen in XMPP 2.0 after I've retired. :) we are already discouraging them with eco xmpp :D -- Fabio

Re: [Standards] unavailable presence from bare JID

2009-04-08 Thread Fabio Forno
always interpreted that as the null resource (while just / should be the resource with length zero) and treated it as if it were a XMPP entity. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-04-07 Thread Fabio Forno
packets (When throttling it makes sense to reduce it) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] roster item exchange

2009-04-05 Thread Fabio Forno
is terrific for automatically adding/changing services accordingly to the user context. Tomorrow or in the next days we can catchup via jabber for exchanging ideas. Now it's 2am here, better go to bed ;) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] ACTIVE: XEP-0263 (ECO-XMPP)

2009-04-01 Thread Fabio Forno
like the JID give up Day, in which users unregister from servers and uninstall their favorite client ;) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XEP-0237: versioning via timestamps?

2009-03-31 Thread Fabio Forno
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Curtis King ck...@mumbo.ca wrote: time makes a bad counter as it can go backwards and there are resolution issues ;-) [...] +1 -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-31 Thread Fabio Forno
/2009-March/021409.html) we saw that r/ stanzas after the regular ones could lead to some lack of reliability, while it's better to just count stanzas and send back a/ acks bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-31 Thread Fabio Forno
the initial presence burst would take tens of seconds in a mobile connection, having to wait for all the acks) bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Ooros srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-31 Thread Fabio Forno
of packets must be acked one by one -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-31 Thread Fabio Forno
all the 3 messages, while any number of them could have been already processed and delivered to the correct recipient. If the message itself contained the sequence number the server would be able to discard duplicates. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-31 Thread Fabio Forno
, and everything is bound to an implicit sequence number bound to stanza count. It seems to work, the only thing to decide is whether to count r a stanzas ;) bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-31 Thread Fabio Forno
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Fabio Forno fabio.fo...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, so the r/ just triggers an ack, and everything is bound to an implicit sequence number bound to stanza count. It seems to work, the only thing to decide is whether to count r a stanzas ;) Just realized: the max

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-31 Thread Fabio Forno
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote: Technically speaking, those aren't stanzas, which might answer the question. And it confirms what I had in mind ;) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

[Standards] pep avatars

2009-03-26 Thread Fabio Forno
an event notification, otherwise it does nothing, avoiding sending redundant data. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Ooros srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] pep avatars

2009-03-26 Thread Fabio Forno
) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Ooros srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] pep avatars

2009-03-26 Thread Fabio Forno
the 80% of the contacts must have changes avatar, while in the normal situations (no avatar changed) I save the 80% of the traffic -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-20 Thread Fabio Forno
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Fabio Forno fabio.fo...@gmail.com wrote: Of course, I still question the need for 'u' at all if we're doing it like this. Now I remember: for limiting latency it's better to allow a window of unacked stanzas  (on slow mobile connections each roundtrip can

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-19 Thread Fabio Forno
the following ack aren't atomically processed. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-19 Thread Fabio Forno
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Fabio Forno fabio.fo...@gmail.com wrote: I see one issue for perfect stream reliability: stanza suplication. An example: duplication of course ;) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-19 Thread Fabio Forno
bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-19 Thread Fabio Forno
the work)? bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

2009-03-19 Thread Fabio Forno
seconds) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

[Standards] roster partial activation privacy lists

2009-03-18 Thread Fabio Forno
VIPs group we must either put them temporarily in the VIPs group or unset the privacy list, and I don't know if there ar workarounds for this (but a service with which we can poke the presence of somebody using an iq/ bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f

Re: [Standards] roster versioning redux

2009-03-12 Thread Fabio Forno
, since the usual pattern is browsing new data, not receiving some information that usually has no or few chages. So I go for #1 -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XEP-0255 (Location Query): ethernet reference type?

2009-03-02 Thread Fabio Forno
with it?) Besides that there is one more reference we are starting using: RFID addresses, which allow to pinpoint the exact position of the device. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XEP-0255 (Location Query): ethernet reference type?

2009-03-02 Thread Fabio Forno
this should be general enough: typerfid/type ididscheme:id/id (need to do some more research for confirming) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Ooros srl jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Fabio Forno
was about to ask the same thing. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Fabio Forno
hundreds of thousands of s2s connection, so let's face it! ;)) bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] roster views

2009-02-28 Thread Fabio Forno
. bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] roster views

2009-02-28 Thread Fabio Forno
, and in a separate iq you set on/off toggles for each group, at any time of the session. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

2009-02-27 Thread Fabio Forno
is a bad idea? -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

2009-02-27 Thread Fabio Forno
it with a resource identifier that the server generates; in this case, the server SHOULD NOT return a stanza error (e.g., forbidden/) to the client but instead SHOULD communicate the generated resource identifier to the client in the IQ result as shown above -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http

Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

2009-02-26 Thread Fabio Forno
-long-sm-id'/ Do you mean using the full jid instead of the previd or in addition? If it's just the jid it can work only if the server sets a resource with some random data, otherwise it becomes extremely easy to hijack a sesssion -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id

Re: [Standards] [Roster|Data] Versioning

2009-02-19 Thread Fabio Forno
possible large item sets are better handled by xep-59, which is more suitable for browsing (disco#items included, but for pubsub nodes) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] [Roster|Data] Versioning

2009-02-19 Thread Fabio Forno
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: I don't think the bandwidth difference is that big here, but I like the idea of putting it in rfc3921bis so that more people implement it. ;-) Evil plan! I wasn't considering this aspect: definitely there! -- Fabio

[Standards] oauth signature

2009-02-15 Thread Fabio Forno
Is the Oauth signature in xep 235 actually calculated with the given values (and all escaping correct)? I'm trying to implement it and I get different values, while I can reproduce the sign of main oauth specs Besides fireeagle are there any other services for testing it? -- ff

Re: [Standards] oauth signature

2009-02-15 Thread Fabio Forno
: 9PQkM4YKgaM067wqrDGshXOwDW0= Escaped signature: 9PQkM4YKgaM067wqrDGshXOwDW0%3D I hope this helps. seth sure, thanks! -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] oauth signature

2009-02-15 Thread Fabio Forno
gems thanks -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

[Standards] roster item exchange

2008-12-29 Thread Fabio Forno
and which not -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] connected and available resources

2008-10-24 Thread Fabio Forno
the stanza (i.e., neither deliver it nor return an error) if it is a presence stanza, (b) MUST return a service-unavailable/ stanza error to the sender if it is an IQ stanza, and (c) SHOULD treat the stanza as if it were addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is a message stanza. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D

Re: [Standards] connected and available resources

2008-10-24 Thread Fabio Forno
of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED]. - If the JID contained in the 'to' attribute is of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource and there is a connected resource that exactly matches the full JID, the server SHOULD deliver the stanza to that connected resource. bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http

Re: [Standards] connected and available resources

2008-10-23 Thread Fabio Forno
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that's a spec bug: s/available/connected/ I think so. For me it makes more sense if in points 1 3 of paragrah 11 we use connected (after that I can start filing tickets across the different server

[Standards] connected and available resources

2008-10-19 Thread Fabio Forno
if the resource belongs to a connected user, even if not online. In this way clients could perform some iq/ queries to well known services before going online, thus eliminating one of the few useful cases for invisibility -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Standards] Full XML

2008-10-10 Thread Fabio Forno
be overcome someway, but of general stream behavior. Although if you find a way to send processing instructions, sooner or later you'll need a way for sending chunks of documents and this is easily done using bytestreams (also in band) bye -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com

Re: [Standards] invisibility

2008-10-09 Thread Fabio Forno
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fabio Forno wrote: (sorry for the delays, but in the last two days of many standards_ml mails went into the spam folder :( ) Hopefully I just put an end to that! I think the problem comes mainly from the google talk

Re: [Standards] invisibility

2008-10-07 Thread Fabio Forno
of privacy lists to mere mortals. I'd stay with the privacy list approach and discuss better ways for setting them. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Standards] invisibility

2008-10-07 Thread Fabio Forno
-- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Standards] XEP-0047 (IBB streams) and acknowledgment

2008-06-13 Thread Fabio Forno
the case when the receiving server has more restrictive policies about IBB than the sending one or the receiving client is too slow, forcing to buffer a large number of packets. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Standards] XEP-0047 (IBB streams) and acknowledgment

2008-06-13 Thread Fabio Forno
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know if existing clients and servers are that smart, but it They will be if people discover that IBB is so good in passing through firewalls. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id

Re: [Standards] XEP-0047 (IBB streams) and acknowledgment

2008-06-11 Thread Fabio Forno
then a fixed bitrate, since it allows severs to dynamically allocate bandwidth accordingly to actual usage. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >