On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, because "conference.jabber.org" needs SRV records just the same as any > other domain. + >> No, since all the cases where we may need the concept of subdomain >> could be solved at application level with other extensions (e.g. I'm >> thinking of a case we worked on time ago where we had to consider a >> subdomain trusted and autoaccept all subscribe from that subdomain) >> >> > I would argue that there is no such thing as a subdomain, from the > perspective of XMPP. Yes, I was about to to answer with some long philosophical consideration about what is what we call a subdomain, but the correct approach is indeed that. The protocol shall not have the concept of subdomain, if somebody wants to consider something a subdomain for configuration or application issue is free to do that. -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [email protected]
