On 7 Mar 2018, at 19:17, Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor)
wrote:
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0048 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
Hello! 07.03.2018, 22:18, "Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor)" :The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0048 beforepresenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:1. What software
Can't make a detailed review today, so here's quickly:
the XEP is implemented in SàT using both private XML storage (XEP-0049) and
PEP.
There are several issues with this XEP, the most important being the race
condition can be specially bad as all bookmarks are saved in the same item.
Also
On Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 08:28:27 CET Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> 2018-03-08 8:22 GMT+01:00 Jonas Wielicki :
> > On Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 07:38:42 CET Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> >> It feels a bit sad that we aren't able to advance a XEP that is widely
> >> deployed (in a way)
2018-03-08 8:22 GMT+01:00 Jonas Wielicki :
> On Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 07:38:42 CET Daniel Gultsch wrote:
>> It feels a bit sad that we aren't able to advance a XEP that is widely
>> deployed (in a way) but I think it is just too late.
>
> Can’t we revert to XEP-0049 (if no
On Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 07:38:42 CET Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> It feels a bit sad that we aren't able to advance a XEP that is widely
> deployed (in a way) but I think it is just too late.
Can’t we revert to XEP-0049 (if no other XEP-0223 implementations show up),
advance *that* to final and
2018-03-07 20:17 GMT+01:00 Jonas Wielicki :
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0048 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:17:24PM -, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0048 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What
> 1. What software has XEP-0048 implemented? Please note that the
> protocol must be implemented in at least two separate codebases (at
> least one of which must be free or open-source software) in order to
> advance from Draft to Final.
Enough.
> 2. Have developers experienced any problems with
On Mittwoch, 7. März 2018 20:17:24 CET Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> 1. What software has XEP-0048 implemented?
We have support for Private XML (XEP-0049)-based bookmarks in aioxmpp (LGPLv3)
and based on that in JabberCat (GPLv3). We haven’t gotten around to implement
PEP-based bookmarks, even though
The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0048 before
presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
1. What software has XEP-0048 implemented? Please note that the
protocol must be
11 matches
Mail list logo