Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0313 (Message Archive Management)

2017-10-25 Thread Michal Piotrowski
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > ___ > Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___

Re: [Standards] Message-IDs

2018-02-14 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Simon Thanks for refreshing the topic. Few things from me below (perspective of XMPP server developer, MongooseIM). Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 13 February 2018 at 17:57, Simon Friedberger wrote: > Hello List! > > > During the discu

Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0092: Software Version

2018-03-21 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 14 March 2018 at 18:28, Jonas Wielicki wrote: > The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0092 before > presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status. > > > During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions: > > 1. What software has XEP-0092

Re: [Standards] Maintaining a list of ongoing conversations

2018-05-14 Thread Michal Piotrowski
rting point for further discussion which we are open to! Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 14 May 2018 at 12:28, JC Brand wrote: > Hi folks > > I'm interested in finding a way to keep track of ongoing conversations and > whether any new messa

Re: [Standards] Sprint for Message Routing

2020-05-11 Thread Michal Piotrowski
dressed to bare JID to all online/available user's sessions. The session is considered online/available only after sending the initial presence. Best regards Michal Piotrowski Software Architect at https://www.erlang-solutions.com/ email: michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com skype: twitte

Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: pending 0.7 update review

2020-05-11 Thread Michal Piotrowski
. Best regards Michal Piotrowski Software Architect at https://www.erlang-solutions.com/ email: michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com skype: twitter/github/medium: michalwski On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 13:17, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 4/22/20 12:07 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Ap

Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: pending 0.7 update review

2020-05-12 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Best regards Michal Piotrowski Software Architect at https://www.erlang-solutions.com/ email: michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com skype: twitter/github/medium: michalwski On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 10:22, Michal Piotrowski < michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com> wrote: > Hi Matthew, > &g

Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: pending 0.7 update review

2020-05-12 Thread Michal Piotrowski
own archive id, which is from before the messages were sent. In other words, I think it'd be good if the sender could quickly learn what is the archive id for the message it just sent, or has the ability to query the archive based on origin-id. Best regards Michal Piotrowski Software Archite

[Standards] Stream Management and BOSH

2015-10-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
e questions are: 1. Doest this make sense? 2. Was Stream Management designed with BOSH in mind or only for regular TCP (or WS) connections? Many thanks in advance for any comment. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com

Re: [Standards] XMPP Summit 19 / FOSDEM

2016-01-14 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi, I'm going to attend the summit but I don't have an account on the wiki. I'd be glad if some could add me to the list. Here are my details (according to the "Summit Participants" table: | Michal | Piotrowski | michalwski | wed | sun | no | | Best regards Michal

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Token-based reconnection

2016-02-09 Thread Michal Piotrowski
ribed here is far from perfect and can be improved and we are open to do it. I really like the idea of using tokens with XEP-0198 but that would require some significant changes to XEP-0198 or creating a new extension to XEP-0198. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Token-based reconnection

2016-02-12 Thread Michal Piotrowski
authenticate (without resuming the session)? Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 12 February 2016 at 11:08, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 06.02.2016 12:22, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> On 05.02.2016 20:04, Lance Stout wrote: >>> Integrating

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0313 (Message Archive Management)

2016-03-09 Thread Michal Piotrowski
hted (for me). Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 8 March 2016 at 19:17, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > Version 0.5.1 of XEP-0313 (Message Archive Management) has been released. > > Abstract: This document defines a protocol to query and control an

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0313 (Message Archive Management)

2016-03-09 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Great, thanks for the hint! Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 9 March 2016 at 11:17, Tobias M wrote: > > On 09.03.2016, at 08:33, Michal Piotrowski > wrote: > > But I don't see any diffs in the examples (only spec version and last &

[Standards] XEP-352 CSI - server behaviour when client's inactive but sends stanzas

2016-03-31 Thread Michal Piotrowski
the server buffer these stanzas and process them later when client is back active? Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com ___ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standard

Re: [Standards] XEP-352 CSI - server behaviour when client's inactive but sends stanzas

2016-03-31 Thread Michal Piotrowski
hould behave as you described. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 31 March 2016 at 16:01, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 31.03.2016 15:26, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The XEP-352 http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0352.html doesn&#x

Re: [Standards] NEW: XEP-0380 (Explicit Message Encryption)

2016-10-27 Thread Michal Piotrowski
The URL doesn't work for me. I get error 404. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 26 October 2016 at 22:42, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > Version 0.1 of XEP-0380 (Explicit Message Encryption) has been released. > > Abstract: This specificat

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

2016-10-27 Thread Michal Piotrowski
The URL is still pointing to version 1.0 from 2013. Is this somehow connected with the error 404 I noticed for the new XEP 380 earlier today? Actually it looks like all the yesterday's updates are not reflected on the xmpp.org pages. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@e

Re: [Standards] NEW: XEP-0380 (Explicit Message Encryption)

2016-10-27 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Thanks! Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 27 October 2016 at 16:08, Sam Whited wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Michal Piotrowski > wrote: > > The URL doesn't work for me. I get error 404. > > Fixed, sorry fo

Re: [Standards] Unread syncing

2016-12-14 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 2 December 2016 at 18:18, forenjunkie wrote: > Ah now im understanding, basically the server should give you a list of > contacts to query for messages. > > i would see this as a simply addition to MAM. > Would you see it as a new parameter to MAM query? or rather a completely new kind of iq

Re: [Standards] Unread syncing

2016-12-14 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 14 December 2016 at 14:50, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 14 Dec 2016, at 11:46, Michal Piotrowski tions.com> wrote: > > > > On 2 December 2016 at 18:18, forenjunkie wrote: > >> Ah now im understanding, basically the server should give you a list of >> contacts to

Re: [Standards] bind2

2017-01-13 Thread Michal Piotrowski
I'm really interested in seeing the changes in bind2. Even if they are just notes. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 13 January 2017 at 12:24, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 13.01.2017 10:27, Kevin Smith wrote: > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 20:09, Ev

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bind 2.0

2017-01-17 Thread Michal Piotrowski
e entire system. > Note: also enable acks? discuss on standards@ Does acks mean stream management? If so then I think it's worth enabling them by default for clients using bind 2.0 Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 17 January 2017 at 16:23, XMPP E

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bind 2.0

2017-01-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
complete list of unread conversations, no matter how long it is. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bind 2.0

2017-01-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
are server responses like stream features. Should server still send them? In my opinion they are redundant in this case as the client is probably not interested and already knows what features will be used. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 18 January 201

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bind 2.0

2017-01-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
it and still the user may want to have information about unread messages for such a contact. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 18 January 2017 at 15:36, Michal Piotrowski < michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com> wrote: > I have another question re

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bind 2.0

2017-01-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
dy can't wait to see the "other XEP". Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bind 2.0

2017-01-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
n RFC 6120 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120#section-7.6.2 Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 19 January 2017 at 12:05, Michal Piotrowski < michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com> wrote: > > On 19 January 2017 at 11:58, Kevin Smith wrote: >

[Standards] XEP-0198 stream resumption with too high 'h' parameter

2017-02-14 Thread Michal Piotrowski
d return a response with some reason and allow the client to try again or bind the session without resumption. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/st

Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 stream resumption with too high 'h' parameter

2017-02-14 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Thanks for the response. This somehow answers my second question. I still would like to know what should happen when server observers too high 'h' parameter when clients sends ack. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 14 February 2017 at 14:05

Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 stream resumption with too high 'h' parameter

2017-02-14 Thread Michal Piotrowski
I totally agree with that. Thanks for your response. I'm wondering if this should somehow be reflected in the XEP. Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 14 February 2017 at 14:20, Georg Lukas wrote: > * Michal Piotrowski [2017-02-14 > 12:1

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-02-23 Thread Michal Piotrowski
andards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > ___ > Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com _

[Standards] Bind 2.0 and Best Practices for Handling Offline Messages interoperability

2017-02-24 Thread Michal Piotrowski
nd delivers unread as described in Bind 2.0 3. Client B sends messages to client A 4. Client A sends its initial presence. To my understanding only after this point the server can deliver messages to the client's resource. I'd gladly hear what I missed. Best regards Michal Piotrows

Re: [Standards] Bind 2.0 and Best Practices for Handling Offline Messages interoperability

2017-02-24 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Kevin, Thanks for your comments. On 24 February 2017 at 10:25, Kevin Smith wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On 24 Feb 2017, at 08:31, Michal Piotrowski solutions.com> wrote: > > XEP-0386: Bind 2.0 spec says: > > > > > Clear the offline messages for this user, if any