Am Di., 25. Feb. 2020 um 15:54 Uhr schrieb Jonas Schäfer :
>
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0066 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What software has
Hi,
see my answers below.
> Am 25.02.2020 um 16:52 schrieb Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor)
> :
>
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0066 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the followin
The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0066 before
presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
1. What software has XEP-0066 implemented? Please note that the
protocol must be implemented
Hello! 23.03.2018, 02:28, "Emmanuel Gil Peyrot" :Hi,On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:57:52AM +0300, Kozlov Konstantin wrote:I don't see any XEP which describes of full procedure of file transferusing OOB.But [1]XEP-0095: Stream Initiation has [2]mention of using OOB as streammethod.I
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:57:52AM +0300, Kozlov Konstantin wrote:
>Hello!
>
[snip]
>I don't see any XEP which describes of full procedure of file transfer
>using OOB.
>But [1]XEP-0095: Stream Initiation has [2]mention of using OOB as stream
>method.
>I guess, this meth
Hello! 21.03.2018, 14:32, "Christian Schudt" :Maybe you are right. It was just a guess, because someone asked for the purpose of 0066.Because the uploaded file is persistent (at least for some time), I concluded that the purpose is for offline file transfer.Maybe the intention was to use jabber:iq:
>> TL;DR: The purpose is/was to transfer files in case the receiver is offline.
> Given the primary mechanism in -66 is iq-based, I don’t think this is true,
> or I misunderstood your point.
Maybe you are right. It was just a guess, because someone asked for the purpose
of 0066.
Because the
On 8 Mar 2018, at 09:25, Christian Schudt wrote:
> TL;DR: The purpose is/was to transfer files in case the receiver is offline.
Given the primary mechanism in -66 is iq-based, I don’t think this is true, or
I misunderstood your point.
/K
___
Standards
On 7 Mar 2018, at 19:17, Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor)
wrote:
>
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0066 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What softw
On Mittwoch, 7. März 2018 20:17:29 CET Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> 1. What software has XEP-0066 implemented?
We have support for the flow in JabberCat (GPLv3), like in gajim
and Conversations as already mentioned elsewhere in this thread.
We do not implement the IQ workflow, nor do we intend to do
Yes transferring files would make sense and the name of the xep kinda
indicates that this might be the purpose. However the XEP goes on
describing itself as a way to communicate all kind of URIs. And I have seen
clients doing this in the wild (=when ever the user enters and sends some
kind of Uri t
> However I'm not really sure what the intended purpose of this XEP is
> and if we still have a use case for that purpose.
I understood the purpose as follows:
a) You upload some file to a server (nowadays you could also use XEP-363).
b) You send a message to a contact with XEP-0066.
c) Contact
Same what Philipp said. Most (not all) clients I know implement a
small subset of the XEP to basically annotate that the URL that is
already in the body of the message should be treated as an
'attachment' or a file download instead of a regular text URL.
This feels like an odd hack and not the inte
Hello! 07.03.2018, 22:18, "Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor)" :The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0066 beforepresenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:1. What software has XEP-0066 implemented
1. What software has XEP-0066 implemented?
Gajim, only 3. communicating a uri via message
2. Have developers experienced any problems with the protocol as
defined in XEP-0066?
Not with 3., but cant comment on the other XEP Parts
3. Is the text of XEP-0066 clear and unambiguous? Are mor
The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0066 before
presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
1. What software has XEP-0066 implemented? Please note that the
protocol must be implemented
16 matches
Mail list logo