[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Wed Dec 19 06:19:33 2007
New Revision: 605548
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605548view=rev
Log:
2007-12-19 Farid Zaripov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
STDCXX-226
* include/rw/_defs.h (_RWSTD_RATIO_DIVIDER): New macro defined the value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-683:
---
Assignee: Martin Sebor
implement notion of expected failures in the test suite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-683:
Attachment: codes.html
Attached the current set of status codes used to report test results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-683:
Attachment: codes.html
Attached a proposed set of extended status codes to distinguish expected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-683:
Attachment: (was: codes.html)
implement notion of expected failures in the test suite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-683:
Attachment: xcodes.html
This time really attached the proposed set of extended status codes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553567
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-683:
-
Travis and I discussed this enhancement a few weeks back and here
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Travis Vitek (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 1:22 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-675) [MSVC] implement
autolinking feature
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-524:
Severity: Runtime Error
Summary: buffer overflow in test 22.locale.time.get.cpp (make_LC_TIME
Components: Web
Reporter: Martin Sebor
The nightly build result pages currently stored in
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/ need to be moved to some project-specific
directory, such as http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/ is now. This should be
done after the stdcxx has been moved to its
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
This has been bugging me -- when someone checks out trunk, does a build
and sends
us build results, we have no way of telling that the build results are, in
fact, for trunk and
not for 4.2.0 (or the head of 4.2.x), because the value of _RWSTD_VER
Components: Test Driver, Tests
Affects Versions: 4.2.0
Reporter: Martin Sebor
Priority: Critical
Tests (or examples) that fail for known reasons that we haven't been able to
deal with should be distinguished from failures that haven't been analyzed yet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-684:
Summary: auto-detect _RWSTD_VER value from branch/file name (was:
ato-detect _RWSTD_VER value
I was recently asked how to go about getting a forgotten password
reset. I thought I'd post the answer(s) here in case someone needs
this info in the future:
If you forgot you svn password here's an FAQ that might help:
http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#svn-authorization-failure
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
This has been bugging me -- when someone checks out trunk, does a build
and sends
us build results, we have no way of telling that the build results are,
in
fact, for trunk and
not for 4.2.0 (or the head of 4.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551846
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-459:
-
The patch looks good to me in general but I have a few compatibility
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551849
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673:
-
Incidentally, how come the 8.cstdint test hasn't been failing on AIX
idea?
Martin
-- Mark
On Dec 13, 2007 2:24 PM, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Black wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
This has been bugging me -- when someone checks out trunk, does a build and
sends
us build results, we have no way of telling that the build results are, in
fact
Thanks to everyone's votes INFRA-1421 is now the most popular
infrastructure request:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:popularissues-panel
Hopefully it'll help get it resolved soon.
Martin
Martin Sebor wrote:
So far there haven't been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-66:
---
Severity: Usability
Affects Version/s: 4.1.3
4.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551937
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-1:
---
I don't see how this could be done in a binary compatible way. To link
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 2:51 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597425 - in
/incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x: include/ansi/cwchar
tests/strings/21.cwchar.cpp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551999
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-333:
-
Couldn't reproduce with gcc 3.2.3-56 (tried 15s and 15S) on Red Hat EL 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551553
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-226:
-
I'm not 100% sure it can do that. The floating point environment
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Attached for your consideration,
This is definitely in order, Thanks! (Feel free to check it in
if you feel so inclined and earn a special prize for your first
of many more stdcxx commits to come ;-)
Martin
Bill
Andrew Black wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
This has been bugging me -- when someone checks out trunk, does a build and
sends
us build results, we have no way of telling that the build results are, in
fact, for trunk and
not for 4.2.0 (or the head of 4.2.x), because the value of _RWSTD_VER
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551615
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-524:
-
I've adjusted your ChangeLog to follow the established format (the date
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551639
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-524:
-
Are you saying I should be paying attention? ;-)
Makes sense.
buffer
Travis Vitek wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote
Martin Sebor wrote:
I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an updated
version with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most
important are the new Goals section with suggested frequencies of
releases, and the integration
++ Standard Library
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Examples
Affects Versions: 4.2.0
Environment: XLC++ 6.0 through 9.0/AIX 5.3
Reporter: Martin Sebor
Assignee: Travis Vitek
Fix For: 4.2.1
Attachments: stdcxx-605.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551653
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605:
-
Hmmm. I tried to change the patch to show you what I meant with the const
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551664
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673:
-
Okay, this sounds like a good plan for now. I checked your patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551678
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-664:
-
I think the dynamic cast patch
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 10:00 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: mailing list for Jira issues?
I'm using the MS Outlook and filtering the JIRA messages by the
[jira]
in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551167
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605:
-
Looks like you've been able to come up with a clean solution after all
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 8:53 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MSVC has non-standard prototype of the wcstok()
Since the configure script performs checking only
So far there haven't been any takers on INFRA-1421 to move stdcxx out
of the incubator and create the new site. I asked on the infra list
if there's something we can do ourselves (w/o root access) but got no
response. I will follow up again soon but in the meantime it perhaps
might help if people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551189
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-226:
-
You're right, I must have been looking at the wrong column. Mea culpa!
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551213
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-664:
-
Didn't someone just say how much fun XLC++ is? ;-)
Yes, I should have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12551216
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-664:
-
FWIW, the test case above fails with gcc 4.1.2. I filed a bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550775
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-226:
-
We still need to benchmark this before making any changes...
Currently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-226:
Attachment: benchmark-stdcxx-226.c
Attached simple benchmark program to compare the runtime
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-650.
---
Fix verified in nightly builds.
Merged to 4.2.1 in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=603470
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-647:
---
Assignee: Farid Zaripov
[MSVC] 0.printf.cpp test fails
Farid Zaripov-2 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:11 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC
(8.0 and 9.0)
Yes, I've tried it and after applying
Any thoughts on this?
Martin Sebor wrote:
I'd like to discuss our plans and schedule for the next few releases,
starting with 4.2.1 and 4.3, work on both of which might very well take
place in parallel.
In the post below, I suggested the end of December for the maintenance
4.2.1
Okay, I updated INFRA-1422 and requested a new mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1422#action_12550847
Once it's set up, well redirect Jira traffic to it.
Martin Sebor wrote:
STDCXX-546 suggests we create a separate mailing list to reflect Jira
that the value is unique for each branch, or at
least distinct
from any release.
Any suggestions for what would be a good value?
Martin Sebor wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Thu Nov 22 04:40:33 2007
New Revision: 597396
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=597396view=rev
Farid Zaripov-2 wrote:
The all MSVC has the non-standard prototype of the wcstok():
wchar_t* wcstok(wchar_t*, const wchar_t*);
The prototype from C standard:
wchar_t* wcstok(wchar_t*, const wchar_t*, wchar_t**);
Since the configure script performs checking only names and
, Markus
Martin Sebor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
author=Farid Zaripov-2
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 2:19 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [PING] Re: library and build sizes on Windows
So would
Travis Vitek wrote:
Farid Zaripov-2 wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
I have no objections. Either way, I need to look at both sets
of messages regardless of where they come from. So, for me,
moving the Jira messages to a new -issues list doesn't have
any significant impact.
I guess it might
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:25 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-507 (or using
__declspec(dllexport/dllimport on gcc/cygwin in shared builds)
It seems that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550194
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-507:
-
The the thread below for a discussion of this issue:
http
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 8:56 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-507 (or using
__declspec(dllexport/dllimport on gcc/cygwin in shared
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:30 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PING] Re: library and build sizes on Windows
I've been doing some work on the test result scripts over
Andrew Black wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
[snip]
But batman script also should to be updated to print the timestamp
of the build at the beginning (### date:); the duration of the
solution generating step (### real time (builddir):) after execution
of the configure.bat
Andrew Black wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Andrew Black wrote:
[snip]
The Batman script is build_stdcxx.bat, located along side the unix
build_stdcxx script. This script is batch file, which calls into
parse_runlog.wsf script for the purpose of processing the result log for
batman.
I suspect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549876
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-585:
-
I assume the patch has tested successfully with all compilers on both
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-308:
Severity: Incorrect Behavior
Affects Version/s: 4.1.4
4.2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-2:
--
Severity: Incorrect Behavior
Affects Version/s: 4.2.0
Added 4.2.0 to the set of Affected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-408:
Affects Version/s: 4.1.2
4.1.4
4.2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-650:
---
Assignee: Martin Sebor
22.locale.codecvt.out test fails to compile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor resolved STDCXX-650.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=602770view=rev
Will close once
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-260:
Affects Version/s: 4.2.0
Fix Version/s: 4.3
Added 4.2.0 to the set of Affected Versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-260:
Severity: Usability
configure-like script to configure library
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-414:
Affects Version/s: (was: trunk)
4.2.0
Fix Version/s: 4.2.1
Set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-275:
---
Assignee: (was: Martin Sebor)
[HP aCC 3.70] -E +Maked ICE on a conditional with new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-544:
Severity: Inefficiency
Affects Version/s: 4.1.2
4.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-498:
Severity: Runtime Error
Fix Version/s: 4.2.1
Assignee: Travis Vitek
Assigned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-503:
Severity: Runtime Error
Affects Version/s: 4.2.0
Fix Version/s: 4.2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-553.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.2.0
Works in 4.2.0. Must have got fixed by
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-231:
Severity: Inefficiency
Affects Version/s: 4.1.2
4.1.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-163:
Severity: Inefficiency
Affects Version/s: 4.1.2
4.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-333:
Severity: Incorrect Behavior
Set Severity to Incorrect Behavior.
[gcc 3.2.3/Linux] std::wfilebuf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-333:
I can't reproduce this with gcc 4.1.2 on Fedora Core 6, x86.
[gcc 3.2.3/Linux] std::wfilebuf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-249:
Severity: Inefficiency
Affects Version/s: 4.1.4
4.2.0
STDCXX-546 suggests we create a separate mailing list to reflect Jira
traffic to so as to relieve stdcxx-dev from all the traffic. Since we
have just asked INFRA to move our mailing lists from the Incubator to
TLP (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1422) this would be
a good time to
author=Farid Zaripov-2
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 2:19 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [PING] Re: library and build sizes on Windows
So would be it possible to change the Windows build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549459
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-240:
-
I understand that what's at issue here is changing the library headers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-242:
Affects Version/s: 4.2.0
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.1)
4.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549587
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605:
-
I think this should work.
One question though: do we need to cast
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Today I've verified the patch for STDCXX-507 on gcc 4.2.0 and gcc
3.4.4.
I get really nervous whenever we start to mess around with the runtime
symbols, especially when changing which ones are exported on Windows
and which ones
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549616
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605:
-
I assume (1) is because of the compiler bug?
For (2) yes, if we can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549242
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-443:
-
Thanks for doing the research! Looks like there is a small improvement
Eric Lemings wrote:
Would it be a good idea to divide the STDCXX distribution into two
separate distributions, one distribution containing the primary source,
tools, and examples, and the second distribution containing the test
driver and test suite?
Would this make the test suite more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549248
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-677:
-
I agree that we should avoid interfering with the native C library
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549250
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-676:
-
Patch committed with a few tweaks for some minor formatting issues (lines
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549268
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605:
-
I don't think the patch is appropriate. The comment above the function
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549261
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-603:
-
Committed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601935view=rev
We also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549274
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-240:
-
Is it enough to #define only _RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS but none of the other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549281
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673:
-
I forgot to respond to your question in above
(https://issues.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549256
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673:
-
I don't know what else we could use on AIX. Maybe we could ask on one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548357
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-604:
-
Thanks Travis. I edited your ChangeLog pursuant to
http://www.nabble.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-490.
---
Resolution: Fixed
IBM says this is fixed in the latest XLC++ patch. We'll verify the fix once we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-336:
Affects Version/s: 4.2.0
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.1)
4.3
All
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548379
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-336:
-
In addition to the config header this issue involves also storing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548479
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-676:
-
A couple of comments/questions:
First, should the code be guarded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548484
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-223:
-
Since %c is being exercised we don't need to add the test case to our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548539
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-676:
-
I had no idea that C supported only such a small subset of the POSIX
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548544
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-673:
-
Hmm, you're right. According to the config header for XLC++ on AIX, char
101 - 200 of 2631 matches
Mail list logo
