Re: Nested properties everywhere....

I know i can do 2 define to get the maxRows and startCounter i do it now because there is not other way but it clutters the view and is a bit annoying to constantly define things. Nested everywhere for every tag where you can define a bean would be so much nicer and the jsp code would be much cle

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean DefineTag.java DefineTei.java LocalStrings.properties

i'm glad to see this was added. i've been using a similarly modified define tag for some time and have found it very convenient. thanks. ab > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

Implement HTTP and HTTPS in a safe, flexible, and easily maintainable manner

This gives an example of how to integrate SSL into a Web App, using Struts as an example. http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-02-2002/jw-0215-ssl.html winmail.dat Description: application/ms-tnef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: DynaActionFormClass & set-property

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Porter, Roy wrote: > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:49:03 - > From: "Porter, Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: DynaActionFormClass & set-property > > Answer in lin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6619] New: - Bad links on the struts home page

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DynaActionFormClass & set-property

Answer in line ... > > I'm trying to add regular Javabean style properties, as > well as dynamic > > properties. > > > > Ah ... then you're not going to like the current implementations of > DynaBeans very much. They currently represent themselves as > having *only* > the set of dynamic prope

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-bean.xml taglib_struts-bean-ref.xml

oalexeev02/02/21 09:49:02 Modified:doc/userGuide struts-bean.xml taglib_struts-bean-ref.xml Log: Add documentation notes for new bean:define tag abilities. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +7 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/struts-bean.xml Index: struts-bean.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean DefineTag.java DefineTei.java LocalStrings.properties

oalexeev02/02/21 09:48:14 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean DefineTag.java DefineTei.java LocalStrings.properties Log: Modify bean:define tag - add ability to take tag's body as value for the new scripting variable. Revision ChangesP

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Struts

I try to correct it, but can't reproduce the problem in my own environment. Trying cleaning then building the dist work fine for me. Checking the log, it seems that the Tiles webapps can't compile the attached classes because the tiles.jar wasn't found. But this jar file has been compiled.

RE: DynaActionFormClass & set-property

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Porter, Roy wrote: > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:03:02 - > From: "Porter, Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: DynaActionFormClass & set-property > > I'm trying to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Applications (the BIG checkin) [LONG]

+1 > Ted Husted wrote: > >> I agree that a beta based on the current nightly build is a reasonable >> course of action for now. >> My real regret is that we did not get a chance to cut a 1.1 release >> before the last wave of improvements came done the pipeline. My concern >> is that either the r

[GUMP] Build Failure - Struts

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Build results exceed maximum length. Please see URL above for details.

Re: Nested properties everywhere....

The tags use direct values or beans themselves to provide values for offsets and such. Would be quite a bit of work to get them all to work off bean properties instead, and there's the added decision of telling the tag that it is to use the values of properties rather than bean refs and values

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Applications (the BIG checkin) [LONG]

Yes, as well as the documentation changes they imply. Martin Cooper wrote: > > Yes, I can do the release manager thing. I'd appreciate some help with the > release notes, though. Would you be up for that, Ted? > > -- > Martin Cooper > > - Original Message - > From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAI

Re: PropertyUtils with added PropertyEditor support

Ok, Martin's initiative has made me dig up the link to my original PropertyEditor rant. :) http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg02111.html It's also in the search results on the message he links to, but it's on the second or third page. That's the thread that I think M

RE: MessageResources

>>If you have the time and inclination, feel free to take a look at what's >>there and propose additions and/or changes (on the commons-dev list). If >you can post patches, I'll see what I can do about applying them. >there's a page or so of documentation you get after building the project, >th

RE: DynaActionFormClass & set-property

I'm trying to add regular Javabean style properties, as well as dynamic properties. an excerpt from the struts-config would be something like: So in effect, the XXDynaActionForm class simply adds 2 properties to the standard DynaActionForm, and lik