But even if it probably won't get fixed, it doesn't feel right to mark it as
resolved. After all, it isn't resolved in the Struts 1.0 branch (where it is
reported). Or am I wrong?
/ Tomas
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Tomas Viberg wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:25:44 +0200
From: Tomas Viberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bugzilla protocol question
But even if it probably won't get
In that case, bugs #10007 and #10008 should also be marked as
RESOLVED/WONTFIX.
/ Tomas
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: Bugzilla protocol question
On
Hi.
First of all: sorry if this request for feature is going to the wrong place.
Now then...
Request for Feature: type attribute in html:text
--
Often I find myself having
private Integer myInt;
public Integer getMyInt() {return myInt;}
I agree with this.
Furthermore, we can also remove all deprecated/old attributes in this
1_1 version.
For backward compatibilities, user should use old version.
For new projects, user should better use 1_1 version.
I will commit the Tiles plugin today, after cactus test suite
Sorry for the inconvenience.
I install the test process and will run it before any further commit.
Do you recommend to do testing for any tomcat version (3 and 4), or is
the latest one enough ?
Cedric
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Doing the fix for 7751, I ran into a case where the
Jesper--
Thanks for taking the time to submit your request.
The best way to formalize this is to use the Bugzilla
bug/feature database so that the request is not lost
and you get notified when the bug/feature is decided
on.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
husted 2002/07/11 05:02:37
Modified:conf/share validator-rules_1_1.dtd
Log:
Add documentation comments.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +181 -17 jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules_1_1.dtd
Index: validator-rules_1_1.dtd
husted 2002/07/11 05:07:23
Modified:conf/share validation_1_1.dtd
Log:
Add documentation comments.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +164 -11 jakarta-struts/conf/share/validation_1_1.dtd
Index: validation_1_1.dtd
In the syntax for the module path pattern, we originally used $A$P which
could stand for application/path.
If we are going with the module nomenclature now, should we change
this to $M$P.
Since its only been out a week, we might be able to apply Nightly build
rules and just pull $A and plug in
+1, for consistency in nomenclature.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the syntax for the module path pattern, we
originally used $A$P which
could stand for application/path.
If we are going with the module
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I have try to run ant test.junit and ant test.tomcat.all on the
nightly build, and they report some errors. As I have just installed
cactus, I don't really know if it is my configuration or the nightly build !
So, does someone have run successfully the test
cedric 2002/07/11 08:31:38
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/tutorial - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:31:43
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/test - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:31:49
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/template - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:31:53
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/skin - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:31:58
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/rssChannel -
New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:32:02
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/portal - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:32:06
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/lang - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:32:10
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/invoice - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:32:15
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/dynPortal -
New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:32:19
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/dev1-1 - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:32:23
jakarta-struts/src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/channel - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cedric 2002/07/11 08:40:01
Removed: src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/example/tiles/portal
UserPortalSettingsAction.java UserPortalAction.java
UserMenuSettingsAction.java UserMenuAction.java
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:34:47 +0200
From: Jesper Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFF: type attribute in html:text
Hi.
First of all: sorry if
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:36:50 +0200
From: Cedric Dumoulin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Running Unit Tests Before Commits
Sorry for the
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:15:02 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: $A$P - $M$P
In the syntax for the module path pattern, we originally
?
Both tests run successfully against my current CVS repository (which
should match the 20020711 nightly build). What errors are you getting?
Setting up Cactus was pretty painful. I found it easiest to download the
jakarta-cactus-ant-1.5-20020421.zip file and grab the JARs out of there,
to put
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:52 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Running Unit Tests Before Commits
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:36:50 +0200
cedric 2002/07/11 09:20:32
Added: src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles DefinitionsFactory.java
DefinitionsFactoryConfig.java
Log:
Define a new interface for Tiles definition factories, and a configuration class.
The new interface provide methods for
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:58:30 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Running Unit Tests Before Commits
-Original
cedric 2002/07/11 09:25:43
Added: src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/definition
ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java
Log:
Wrapper class providing new definition factory interface around the old
ComponentDefinitionFactory.
This wrapper is
repository (which
should match the 20020711 nightly build). What errors are you getting?
Setting up Cactus was pretty painful. I found it easiest to download the
jakarta-cactus-ant-1.5-20020421.zip file and grab the JARs out of there,
to put into my $ANT_HOME/lib directory.
Cedric
Using the latest commons-beanutils jar solves the problem !
Now all test suites run without any errors. So, I can finish up my
commits.
Thanks Craig for your help.
Cedric
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Have you downloaded the latest and greatest commons-beanutils nightly?
The current
cedric 2002/07/11 09:40:34
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles DefinitionsUtil.java
Log:
Change methods implementations, and some signatures ;-( to reflect the
new definition factory interface.
Users having used some methods from this class will need to recompile their
cedric 2002/07/11 09:44:24
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/tiles
InitDefinitionsTag.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles
ActionComponentServlet.java
Log:
Use the latest definition factory.
Servlet is no
cedric 2002/07/11 09:46:41
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/actions
DefinitionDispatcherAction.java NoOpAction.java
ReloadDefinitionsAction.java TilesAction.java
ViewDefinitionsAction.java
Log:
cedric 2002/07/11 09:48:25
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/xmlDefinition
I18nFactorySet.java
Log:
Add toString() method outputting current factories.
This enable the ViewAction which now work again.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3
cedric 2002/07/11 09:48:46
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/definition
ReloadableDefinitionsFactory.java
Log:
Javadoc update.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +6 -3
cedric 2002/07/11 09:54:33
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/tiles
GetAttributeTag.java PutTag.java
Log:
Correct a bug encountered with Orion.
Change the way the body value is detected and stored in the class. Now, the
attribute 'value' is
Cedric,
I'm getting compile errors on not being able to find
org.apache.struts.tiles.definition.ConfigurableDefinitionsFactory. Did
you perhaps forget to add it?
Craig
On 11 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 11 Jul 2002 16:48:46 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts
cedric 2002/07/11 09:58:46
Modified:web/tiles-documentation/WEB-INF struts-config.xml
tiles-examples-defs.xml tiles-tests-defs.xml
web.xml
Log:
Take into account the new Tiles plugin initialization.
- Plugin is specified in
cedric 2002/07/11 09:59:38
Modified:web/tiles-documentation/doc/portal revisions.jsp
Log:
Update news
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +10 -1 jakarta-struts/web/tiles-documentation/doc/portal/revisions.jsp
Index: revisions.jsp
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
cedric 2002/07/11 10:37:01
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles DefinitionsUtil.java
TilesPlugin.java
Log:
Remove references to the not yet (maybe never) released
ConfigurableDefinitionsFactory class.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +48
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added the documentation/comments for the new
validator DTDs, but have
a question:
Do we really want two DTDs?
Orginally, there was just one configuration file,
but we saw it would be
convenient to have a master rules file and one or
more
/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/news.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- news.xml 10 Jul 2002 22:28:42 - 1.8
+++ news.xml 12 Jul 2002 01:23:19 - 1.9
@@ -40,6 +40,35 @@
section name=News href=news
+h3a name=20020711/a11 July
: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/news.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- news.xml 12 Jul 2002 01:23:19 - 1.9
+++ news.xml 12 Jul 2002 01:38:20 - 1.10
@@ -40,6 +40,30 @@
section name=News href=news
+h3a name=20020711
Can someone update the website docs when they get
chance :) There's been lots of news lately and other
changes.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
jholmes 2002/07/11 18:55:38
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
latest status
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +3 -2 jakarta-struts/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/STATUS,v
Well, I tried, and it's at least partially updated. Some files, though, have
incorrect permissions set on them, and jar blew up when it hit the first of
those. The News page, however, was updated.
Ted, could you fix the permissions on the files in userGuide so that they
have group write, please?
martinc 2002/07/11 20:59:32
Modified:doc/userGuide preface.xml
Log:
Just happened to notice a typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/preface.xml
Index: preface.xml
How do we compare two variables using logic:equal without using scriplet.
Bean1 {
String x;
}
Bean2 {
String y;
}
The logic required is :
if(b1.x == b2.y)
display message1.
else
display message2.
end if.,
where b1, b2 are objects of type Bean1, Bean2 respectively.
I have only jsp 1.1 container. i would appreciate if u could provide a solution with
struts tag.
regards,
sri.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Raible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Doubt in logic:equal
Easy with
55 matches
Mail list logo
